Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2020 Nov;24(4):484-495. 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.4.484.

Impact of lymph node staging systems in predicting outcome in patients with ampullary cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Lymph node (LN) metastasis though, is a poor prognostic factor for ampullary carcinoma (APC), the impact of Lymph node ratio (LNR) and Logarithm odds of positive lymph node (LODDS) in the long-term survival remains controversial. We evaluated the factors affecting the long-term outcome in APC patients with emphasis on LNR and LODDS.
Methods
The prospectively collected data of 198 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for APC was analyzed after excluding 12 patients for various reasons. Factors affecting Disease specific survival (DSS) and Recurrence free survival (RFS) were analyzed with special reference to LN positivity, LNR and LODDS.
Results
Out of 186, 117 (62.9%) patients were alive at a median follow-up of 39.5 months and 72 (38.7%) developed recurrence. The overall 5-year DSS was 59.3% & RFS 54.9%. Univariate analysis showed T-stage, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, LN positivity, LNR and LODDS was significantly affected DSS and RFS. On multivariate analysis, perineural invasion, LN positivity, LNR and LODDS lost its significance for DSS and RFS. AUC for prediction of DSS and RFS for LNR was 0.654 (p<0.001) & 0.629 (p=0.003) respectively and for LODDS, it was 0.697 (p<0.001) & 0.677 (p=0.001) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of LNR (0.1) for DSS were 37.7% & 83.8% and for RFS were 36.1% & 83.3%; for LODDS (−1.00), sensitivity and specificity for DSS was 62.3% and 67.5% and for RFS it was 59.7% and 66.7% respectively.
Conclusions
LNR and LODDS although independently seem to affect the RFS and DSS, albeit have a low sensitivity and specificity in predicting DSS and RFS.

Keyword

Periampullary; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Lymph node ratio; LODDS; Survival; Long term

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Patient profile with inclusion and exclusion criteria.

  • Fig. 2 (A and B) Depicting significantly better disease specific survival (DSS) in patients with T1/T2 stage and well differentiated ampullary tumors; (C-G) DSS is worse with patients with Perineural invasion, lymph node ratio (LNR) of >0.1, LODDS cut off at 4 & 5, lymph node positive disease, and >3 L.N positive, however not statistically significant; (H) ROC curves showing DSS prediction by LNR. AUC was 0.654 for DSS with p-value of <0.001; (I) ROC curves showing DSS prediction by LODDS. AUC was 0.697 for DSS with p-value of <0.001.

  • Fig. 3 (A and B) Depicting significantly lower recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with T1/T2 stage and well differentiated ampullary tumor; (C-G) RFS is worse in patients with Perineural invasion, lymph node ration of >0.1, LODDS cut off at 4 & 5, lymph node positivity, and >3 L.N. positive, however not statistically significant; (H) ROC curves showing RFS prediction by LNR. AUC was 0.629 for RFS with p-value of 0.003; (I) ROC curves showing RFS prediction by LODDS. AUC was 0.677 for RFS with p-value of <0.001.


Reference

1. Albores-Saavedra J, Schwartz AM, Batich K, Henson DE. 2009; Cancers of the ampulla of Vater: demographics, morphology, and survival based on 5,625 cases from the SEER program. J Surg Oncol. 100:598–605. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21374. PMID: 19697352.
Article
2. Sugimoto K, Sakamoto K, Tomiki Y, Goto M, Kotake K, Sugihara K. 2015; Proposal of new classification for stage III colon cancer based on the lymph node ratio: analysis of 4,172 patients from multi-institutional database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 22:528–534. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4015-9. PMID: 25160735.
Article
3. Peschaud F, Benoist S, Julié C, Beauchet A, Penna C, Rougier P, et al. 2008; The ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes is a powerful independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 248:1067–1073. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818842ec. PMID: 19092352.
Article
4. Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, Winter JM, Assumpcao L, Lillemoe KD, et al. 2007; Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 141:610–618. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.013. PMID: 17462460.
Article
5. Bhamidipati CM, Stukenborg GJ, Thomas CJ, Lau CL, Kozower BD, Jones DR. 2012; Pathologic lymph node ratio is a predictor of survival in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 94:1643–1651. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.078. PMID: 22621876.
Article
6. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, de Manzoni G, Di Leo A, Marrelli D, et al. Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer Study (GIRCG). 2008; The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 34:159–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.018. PMID: 17566691.
Article
7. Slidell MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, Wolfgang C, Herman JM, Schulick RD, et al. 2008; Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:165–174. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9587-1. PMID: 17896141.
Article
8. House MG, Gönen M, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, et al. 2007; Prognostic significance of pathologic nodal status in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 11:1549–1555. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0243-7. PMID: 17786531.
Article
9. Lee SR, Kim HO, Park YL, Shin JH. 2014; Lymph node ratio predicts local recurrence for periampullary tumours. ANZ J Surg. 84:353–358. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12129. PMID: 23521761.
Article
10. Farid SG, Falk GA, Joyce D, Chalikonda S, Walsh RM, Smith AM, et al. 2014; Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas. HPB (Oxford). 16:582–591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00614.x. PMID: 23777362. PMCID: PMC4048080.
Article
11. Tol JA, Brosens LA, van Dieren S, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Besselink MG, et al. 2015; Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Br J Surg. 102:237–245. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9709. PMID: 25529117.
Article
12. Sakata J, Shirai Y, Wakai T, Ajioka Y, Akazawa K, Hatakeyama K. 2011; Assessment of the nodal status in ampullary carcinoma: the number of positive lymph nodes versus the lymph node ratio. World J Surg. 35:2118–2124. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1175-7. PMID: 21717240.
Article
13. Sierzega M, Nowak K, Kulig J, Matyja A, Nowak W, Popiela T. 2009; Lymph node involvement in ampullary cancer: the importance of the number, ratio, and location of metastatic nodes. J Surg Oncol. 100:19–24. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21283. PMID: 19384907.
Article
14. Böttger TC, Boddin J, Heintz A, Junginger T. 1997; Clinicopathologic study for the assessment of resection for ampullary carcinoma. World J Surg. 21:379–383. DOI: 10.1007/PL00012257. PMID: 9143568.
Article
15. Morales-Oyarvide V, Rubinson DA, Dunne RF, Kozak MM, Bui JL, Yuan C, et al. 2017; Lymph node metastases in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predictors of disease recurrence and survival. Br J Cancer. 117:1874–1882. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.349. PMID: 28982112. PMCID: PMC5729468.
Article
16. He C, Mao Y, Wang J, Huang X, Lin X, Li S. 2018; Surgical management of periampullary adenocarcinoma: defining an optimal prognostic lymph node stratification schema. J Cancer. 9:1667–1679. DOI: 10.7150/jca.24109. PMID: 29760806. PMCID: PMC5950597.
Article
17. Ramacciato G, Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Pinna AD, Ravaioli M, Jovine E, et al. 2017; Prognostic role of nodal ratio, LODDS, pN in patients with pancreatic cancer with venous involvement. BMC Surg. 17:109. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-017-0311-1. PMID: 29169392. PMCID: PMC5701499.
Article
18. Mishra PK, Saluja SS, Gupta M, Rajalingam R, Pattnaik P. 2011; Blumgart's technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: an appraisal. Dig Surg. 28:281–287. DOI: 10.1159/000329584. PMID: 21811074.
Article
19. Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE. 2013; Longterm survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinomas. HPB (Oxford). 15:951–957. DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12071. PMID: 23472708. PMCID: PMC3843613.
Article
20. Hurtuk MG, Hughes C, Shoup M, Aranha GV. 2009; Does lymph node ratio impact survival in resected periampullary malignancies? Am J Surg. 197:348–352. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.010. PMID: 19245913.
Article
21. Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Bloomston M. 2010; Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:991–997. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0883-9. PMID: 20108122. PMCID: PMC2861840.
Article
22. Falconi M, Crippa S, Domínguez I, Barugola G, Capelli P, Marcucci S, et al. 2008; Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and number of resected nodes after curative resection of ampulla of Vater carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:3178–3186. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0099-4. PMID: 18712568.
Article
23. Kim RD, Kundhal PS, McGilvray ID, Cattral MS, Taylor B, Langer B, et al. 2006; Predictors of failure after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 202:112–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.002. PMID: 16377504.
Article
24. Doepker MP, Thompson ZJ, Centeno BA, Kim RD, Wong J, Hodul PJ. 2016; Clinicopathologic and survival analysis of resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 114:170–175. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24281. PMID: 27158031.
Article
25. Norero E, Viñuela E, Báez S, Martínez C, Reyes J, Kusanovic R, et al. 2011; [Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of periampullary tumors]. Rev Med Chil. 139:1015–1024. Spanish. DOI: 10.4067/S0034-98872011000800006. PMID: 22215331.
26. Jarufe NP, Coldham C, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR. 2004; Favourable prognostic factors in a large UK experience of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and periampullary region. Dig Surg. 21:202–209. DOI: 10.1159/000079346. PMID: 15218236.
Article
27. Choi SB, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Kim YC, Choi SY. 2011; Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors for ampulla of Vater cancer. Scand J Surg. 100:92–98. DOI: 10.1177/145749691110000205. PMID: 21737384.
Article
28. Shamseddine AI, Mukherji D, Melki C, Elias E, Eloubeidi M, Dimassi H, et al. 2014; Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor after resection of periampullary malignancies: data from a tertiary referral center in the middle East. Am J Clin Oncol. 37:13–18. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31826b9c74. PMID: 23111358.
29. Kang HJ, Eo SH, Kim SC, Park KM, Lee YJ, Lee SK, et al. 2014; Increased number of metastatic lymph nodes in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater as a prognostic factor: a proposal of new nodal classification. Surgery. 155:74–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.08.004. PMID: 24238122.
Article
30. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hayashidani Y, Hashimoto Y, Nakashima A, et al. 2010; Number of metastatic lymph nodes, but not lymph node ratio, is an independent prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 211:196–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.037. PMID: 20670857.
Article
31. Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP. 2004; The metastatic/ examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 70:235–240. discussion 240PMID: 15055847.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr