J Korean Med Sci.  2020 Nov;35(43):e356. 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e356.

Practical Utility of D-dimer Test for Venous Thromboembolism in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Depends on Disease Activity: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Hongcheon, Korea

Abstract

Background
The D-dimer test is a screening tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, its utility for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains unclear. Here, we examined the utility of the D-dimer test as a screening tool for VTE in SLE patients.
Methods
SLE patients (n = 276) and age- and sex-matched patients with non-rheumatic disease (n = 1,104), all of whom underwent D-dimer testing to screen for VTE, were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity and receiver operating characteristics curve of the D-dimer test were compared in both groups. Then, subgroup of SLE patients in whom the D-dimer test can be useful was sought.
Results
The incidence of VTE was more common in SLE patients than controls (10.9% vs. 4.0%). Although the sensitivity of the D-dimer test was comparable between SLE patients and controls (93.3% vs. 90.9%), the specificity of the test was profoundly lower in SLE patients compared to controls (28.4% vs. 84.4%). The area under the curve (AUC) of the D-dimer for VTE was 0.669 in SLE patients and 0.90 in control group. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that SLE disease activity index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) was significantly associated with D-dimer levels in SLE patients (β = 0.155; P = 0.022). Subgroup analysis showed that the AUC is moderate (0.768) with low disease activity, while it is low (0.518) with high SLEDAI-2K.
Conclusion
The D-dimer test may not be a useful screening tool for VTE in patients with active SLE. D-dimer test for predicting VTE in SLE patients should be differentially applied according to disease activity of SLE.

Keyword

D-dimer; Venous Thromboembolism; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; SLEDAI-2K

Figure

  • Fig. 1 D-dimer levels in SLE and control subjects according to the presence of VTE.D-dimer levels were highly discriminative between VTE and no VTE group in control subjects. On the contrary, D-dimer levels were comparable between the two groups in SLE patients.SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus, VTE = venous thromboembolism.

  • Fig. 2 ROC curves of D-dimer for VTE in study subjects.On ROC curve analysis, (A) the AUC for predicting VTE was 0.900 (95% CI, 0.836–0.963) in control subjects, (B) 0.669 (95% CI, 0.575–0.763) in SLE subjects. When SLE patients were subdivided according to SLEDAI-2K, the AUC for the D-dimer in SLEDAI-2K ≤ 3 was (C) 0.768 (95% CI, 0.541–0.994), (D) 0.653 (95% CI, 0.528–0.777) in 4 ≤ SLEDAI-2K ≤ 12, (E) 0.518 (95% CI, 0.328–0.708) in SLEDAI-2K > 12.ROC = receiver operating curve, VTE = venous thromboembolism, AUC = area under the curve, CI = confidence interval, SLE = systemic lupus erythematosus, SLEDAI-2K = SLE disease activity index-2000.


Reference

1. Tagalakis V, Patenaude V, Kahn SR, Suissa S. Incidence of and mortality from venous thromboembolism in a real-world population: the Q-VTE Study Cohort. Am J Med. 2013; 126(9):832.e13–832.e21.
Article
2. Stein PD, Matta F. Epidemiology and incidence: the scope of the problem and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism. Clin Chest Med. 2010; 31(4):611–628. PMID: 21047571.
Article
3. Righini M, Robert-Ebadi H, Le Gal G. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2017; 15(7):1251–1261. PMID: 28671347.
Article
4. Kline JA. Diagnosis and exclusion of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2018; 163:207–220. PMID: 28683951.
Article
5. Wells PS, Ihaddadene R, Reilly A, Forgie MA. Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: 20 years of progress. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 168(2):131–140. PMID: 29310137.
Article
6. Geersing GJ, Janssen KJ, Oudega R, Bax L, Hoes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. Excluding venous thromboembolism using point of care D-dimer tests in outpatients: a diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2990. PMID: 19684102.
Article
7. Kabrhel C, Mark Courtney D, Camargo CA Jr, Plewa MC, Nordenholz KE, Moore CL, et al. Factors associated with positive D-dimer results in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17(6):589–597. PMID: 20624138.
Article
8. Lee S, Hwang JI, Kim Y, Yoon PW, Ahn J, Yoo JJ. Venous thromboembolism following hip and knee replacement arthroplasty in Korea: a nationwide study based on claims registry. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(1):80–88. PMID: 26770042.
Article
9. Hartman EA, van Royen-Kerkhof A, Jacobs JW, Welsing PM, Fritsch-Stork RD. Performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria versus the 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in adult and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2018; 17(3):316–322. PMID: 29366725.
Article
10. Aviña-Zubieta JA, Vostretsova K, De Vera MA, Sayre EC, Choi HK. The risk of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a general population-based study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015; 45(2):195–201. PMID: 26364556.
Article
11. Linkins LA, Takach Lapner S. Review of D-dimer testing: good, bad, and ugly. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017; 39 Suppl 1:98–103. PMID: 28447414.
Article
12. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40(9):1725.
Article
13. Geersing GJ, Zuithoff NP, Kearon C, Anderson DR, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Elf JL, et al. Exclusion of deep vein thrombosis using the Wells rule in clinically important subgroups: individual patient data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014; 348:g1340. PMID: 24615063.
Article
14. Goldhaber SZ, Bounameaux H. Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Lancet. 2012; 379(9828):1835–1846. PMID: 22494827.
Article
15. Lee YS, Lee YK, Han SB, Nam CH, Parvizi J, Koo KH. Natural progress of D-dimer following total joint arthroplasty: a baseline for the diagnosis of the early postoperative infection. J Orthop Surg. 2018; 13(1):36.
Article
16. Righini M, Nendaz M, Le Gal G, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Influence of age on the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5(9):1869–1877. PMID: 17596141.
Article
17. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29(2):288–291. PMID: 11838846.
18. Mok CC, Ho LY, Yu KL, To CH. Venous thromboembolism in southern Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29(6):599–604. PMID: 20101427.
Article
19. Sarabi ZS, Chang E, Bobba R, Ibanez D, Gladman D, Urowitz M, et al. Incidence rates of arterial and venous thrombosis after diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 53(4):609–612. PMID: 16082635.
Article
20. Zaldívar-Alcántara H, Herrera-Jiménez LE, Dehesa-López E, Correa-Rotter R. Risk factors for the development of thrombotic complication in patients with lupus erythematosus and lupus nephropatic. Rev Invest Clin. 2013; 65(3):199–208. PMID: 23877806.
21. Xu J, Lupu F, Esmon CT. Inflammation, innate immunity and blood coagulation. Hamostaseologie. 2010; 30(1):5–6. 8–9. PMID: 20162248.
Article
22. Lundström E, Gustafsson JT, Jönsen A, Leonard D, Zickert A, Elvin K, et al. HLA-DRB1*04/*13 alleles are associated with vascular disease and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72(6):1018–1025. PMID: 22893315.
Article
23. Dhillon PK, Adams MJ. Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: role of impaired fibrinolysis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2013; 39(4):434–440. PMID: 23504607.
Article
24. Meesters EW, Hansen H, Spronk HM, Hamulyak K, Rosing J, Rowshani AT, et al. The inflammation and coagulation cross-talk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007; 18(1):21–28. PMID: 17179822.
Article
25. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000; 83(3):416–420. PMID: 10744147.
Article
26. Wells PS, Owen C, Doucette S, Fergusson D, Tran H. Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? JAMA. 2006; 295(2):199–207. PMID: 16403932.
Article
27. Park R, Seo YI, Yoon SG, Choi TY, Shin JW, Uh ST, et al. Utility of D-dimer assay for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: single institute study. Korean J Lab Med. 2008; 28(6):419–424. PMID: 19127105.
Article
28. Kim JY, Kim KH, Cho JY, Sim DS, Yoon HJ, Yoon NS, et al. D-dimer/troponin ratio in the differential diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Korean J Intern Med. 2019; 34(6):1263–1271. PMID: 30685960.
29. Kim SA, Yhim HY, Bang SM. Current management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: focus on direct oral anticoagulants. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(6):e52. PMID: 30787683.
Article
30. Lozano-Polo L, Puig-Campmany M, Herrera-Mateo S, Mateo-Roca M, Santos-Rodríguez JA, Benito-Vales S. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the elderly: adherence to guidelines and age-adjusted D-dimer concentration values. Emergencias. 2018; 30(5):321–327. PMID: 30260116.
31. Alvarez-Perez FJ, Castelo-Branco M, Alvarez-Sabin J. Usefulness of measurement of fibrinogen, D-dimer, D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio, C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate to assess the pathophysiology and mechanism of ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011; 82(9):986–992. PMID: 21296900.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr