Ann Rehabil Med.  2020 Oct;44(5):362-369. 10.5535/arm.20060.

Motor Function in the Late Phase After Stroke: Stroke Survivors’ Perspective

• Bunketorp-Käll L
• Pekna M
• Pekny M
• Samuelsson H
• Blomstrand C
• Nilsson M

• KMID: 2508461
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20060

Abstract

Objective
To examine the association between observer-assessed functional status and perceived recovery in the late phase after stroke. The study also aimed to determine whether observer-assessed functional improvements as a result of horse-riding therapy (H-RT) are related to enhanced perception of stroke recovery.
Methods
This is a descriptive correlational study using data derived from a three-armed randomized controlled trial in which 123 individuals were enrolled, among whom 43 received H-RT for 12 weeks. The measures included the Modified Motor Assessment Scale, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, timed 10-m walk, and perceived recovery from stroke indicated by item #9 in the Stroke Impact Scale (version 2.0). Spearman rank order correlation (r_s) was used in the analyses.
Results
There were moderate to strong positive or negative correlations between all four observer-assessed motor variables and participants’ ratings of perceived late-phase stroke recovery at trial entrance, ranging from r_s=-0.49 to r_s=0.54 (p<0.001). The results of the correlational analyses of variable changes showed that, after the end of the H-RT intervention, both self-selected and fast gait speed improvement were significantly correlated with increments in self-rated stroke recovery (r_s=-0.41, p=0.01 and r_s=-0.38, p=0.02, respectively).
Conclusion
This study provided data supporting the association between individual ratings of self-perceived recovery after stroke and observer-assessed individual motor function. The results further demonstrate that enhancement in perceived stroke recovery after completing the intervention was associated with objectively measured gains in both self-selected and fast gait speed.

Keyword

Stroke; Recovery; Horseback riding therapies; Walking speed; Motor activity

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Scatter plots for the association between gains in self-selected gait speed (A) and fast gait speed (B), and increments in perceived stroke recovery after end of horse-riding therapy.

Reference

1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011; 377:1693–702.

2. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8:741–54.

3. Ikai T, Kamikubo T, Takehara I, Nishi M, Miyano S. Dynamic postural control in patients with hemiparesis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82:463–9.

4. Weerdesteyn V, de Niet M, van Duijnhoven HJ, Geurts AC. Falls in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45:1195–213.

5. Sunnerhagen KS, Olver J, Francisco GE. Assessing and treating functional impairment in poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013; Jan. 15. 80(3 Suppl 2):S35–44.

6. Andrenelli E, Ippoliti E, Coccia M, Millevolte M, Cicconi B, Latini L, et al. Features and predictors of activity limitations and participation restriction 2 years after intensive rehabilitation following first-ever stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015; 51:575–85.

7. Venna VR, Xu Y, Doran SJ, Patrizz A, McCullough LD. Social interaction plays a critical role in neurogenesis and recovery after stroke. Transl Psychiatry. 2014; 4:e351.

8. Alzahrani M, Dean C, Ada L. Relationship between walking performance and types of community-based activities in people with stroke: an observational study. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011; 15:45–51.

9. Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, Jeng JS, Hung C. How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009; 40:163–8.

10. Bunketorp-Kall L, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Samuelsson H, Pekny T, Blomve K, Pekna M, et al. Long-term improvements after multimodal rehabilitation in late phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2017; 48:1916–24.

11. Bunketorp Kall L, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Blomstrand C, Pekna M, Pekny M, Nilsson M. The effects of a rhythm and music-based therapy program and therapeutic riding in late recovery phase following stroke: a study protocol for a three-armed randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2012; 12:141.

12. Bunketorp-Kall L, Pekna M, Pekny M, Blomstrand C, Nilsson M. Effects of horse-riding therapy and rhythm and music-based therapy on functional mobility in late phase after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019; 45:483–92.

13. Lee KB, Lim SH, Kim KH, Kim KJ, Kim YR, Chang WN, et al. Six-month functional recovery of stroke patients: a multi-time-point study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015; 38:173–80.

14. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5:603–12.

15. Groeneveld IF, Goossens PH, van Meijeren-Pont W, Arwert HJ, Meesters JJL, Rambaran Mishre AD, et al. Value-based stroke rehabilitation: feasibility and results of patient-reported outcome measures in the first year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019; 28:499–512.

16. Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Lapin B, Uchino K. Added value of patient-reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6:e005356.

17. Lee KB, Kim JH, Lee KS. The relationship between motor recovery and gait velocity during dual tasks in patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27:1173–6.

18. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM, Richards L, Perera S, et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007; 38:2096–100.

19. Patterson SL, Forrester LW, Rodgers MM, Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Sorkin JD, et al. Determinants of walking function after stroke: differences by deficit severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88:115–9.

20. Montero-Odasso M, Schapira M, Soriano ER, Varela M, Kaplan R, Camera LA, et al. Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005; 60:1304–9.

21. Sartor-Glittenberg C, Lehmann S, Okada M, Rosen D, Brewer K, Bay RC. Variables explaining health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2014; 37:83–91.

22. Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:234–9.

23. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Hemiplegic gait after stroke: is measurement of maximum speed required? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87:358–63.

24. Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: extension to nonneurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997; 28:307–10.

25. Appelros P, Terent A. Characteristics of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale: results from a population-based stroke cohort at baseline and after one year. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004; 17:21–7.

26. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999; 30:2131–40.

27. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995; 27:27–36.

28. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:1641–7.

29. Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, Azen SP, Wu SS, Nadeau SE, et al. Protocol for the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-stroke (LEAPS) trial: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2007; 7:39.

30. Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:1018–33.

31. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995; 26:982–9.

32. Andersson C, Clevnert M. Reliability testing of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale according to Uppsala University Hospital (M-MAS UAS-99). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University;2000.

33. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985; 65:175–80.

34. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum;1988.

35. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2004; 56:171–6.

36. Ng SS, Ng PC, Lee CY, Ng ES, Tong MH. Walkway lengths for measuring walking speed in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44:43–6.