Anat Cell Biol.  2020 Sep;53(3):376-377. 10.5115/acb.20.126.

In vivo magnetic resonance imaging morphometry of the patella bone in South Indian population

• Raja BS

• KMID: 2507652
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5115/acb.20.126

Reference

References

1. Muhamed R, Saralaya VV, Murlimanju BV, Chettiar GK. 2017; In vivo magnetic resonance imaging morphometry of the patella bone in South Indian population. Anat Cell Biol. 50:99–103. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2017.50.2.99. PMID: 28713612.

2. Hamilton WG, Ammeen DJ, Parks NL, Goyal N, Engh GA. 2017; Patellar cut and composite thickness: the influence on postoperative motion and complications in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 32:1803–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.033. PMID: 28108171.

3. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Burstein D, Gold GE, Eckstein F, Baum T, Mosher TJ, Carrino JA, Guermazi A. 2011; Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. Radiographics. 31:37–61. DOI: 10.1148/rg.311105084. PMID: 21257932.

4. Markhardt BK, Li G, Kijowski R. 2018; The clinical significance of osteophytes in compartments of the knee joint with normal articular cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 210:W164–71. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18664. PMID: 29470158. PMCID: PMC6334768.