Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.  2020 Oct;53(5):285-290. 10.5090/kjtcs.19.099.

Hemodynamic Performance of Pericardial Bioprostheses in the Aortic Position

• Lee H
• Hwang HY
• Sohn SH
• Choi JW
• Park JB
• Kim KH
• Kim KB

• KMID: 2507344
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.19.099

Abstract

Background
This study was conducted to evaluate the hemodynamic performance and the incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) using bovine pericardial valves (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magana and Magna Ease).
Methods
In total, 216 patients (mean age, 70.0±10.5 years) who underwent AVR using stented bovine pericardial valves and had follow-up echocardiography between 3 months and 2 years (mean, 12.0±6.6 months) after surgery were enrolled. The implanted valve sizes were 19, 21, 23, and 25 mm in 32, 56, 99, and 29 patients, respectively.
Results
On follow-up echocardiography, the mean transvalvular pressure gradients for the 19-mm, 21-mm, 23-mm, and 25-mm valves were 13.3±4.4, 12.6±4.2, 10.5±3.9, and 10.2± 3.7 mm Hg, respectively. The effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.25±0.26, 1.54±0.31, 1.81±0.41, and 1.87±0.33 ㎠ , respectively. These values were smaller than those suggested by the manufacturer for the corresponding sizes. No patients had PPM, when based on the reference EOA. However, moderate (EOA index ≤0.85㎠ /㎡ ) and severe (EOA index ≤0.65 ㎠ /㎡ ) PPM was present in 56 patients (11.8%) and 9 patients (1.9%), respectively, when using the measured values.
Conclusion
Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease bovine pericardial valves showed satisfactory hemodynamic performance with low rates of PPM, although the reference EOA could overestimate the true EOA for individual patients.

Keyword

Aortic valve; Surgery; Heart valves; Bioprosthesis; Hemodynamics