Knee Surg Relat Res.  2020 Mar;32(1):e8. 10.1186/s43019-019-0027-x.

Poorer dynamic postural stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture combined with lateral meniscus tear than in those with medial meniscus tear

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Sports Medical Center, , Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro (Anam-dong 5-ga) Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, South Korea
  • 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barunsesang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea

Abstract

Background
Only limited data are available regarding postural stability between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients with medial meniscus (MM) tear and those with lateral meniscus (LM) tear. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative postural stability for both involved and uninvolved knees in ACL rupture combined with MM and LM tears. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in postural stability between these two groups.
Methods
Ninety-three ACL-injured patients (53 combined with MM tears vs. 40 combined with LM tears) were included. Static and dynamic postural stability were evaluated with the overall stability index (OSI), anterior– posterior stability index (APSI), and medial–lateral stability index (MLSI) using stabilometry. Knee muscle strength was evaluated using an isokinetic testing device.
Results
In the static postural stability test, none of the stability indices showed significant differences between the two groups for both knees (p > 0.05). In the dynamic postural stability test for involved side knees, the OSI and APSI were significantly higher in the LM tear group compared to the MM tear group (OSI: 2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5, p = 0.001; APSI: 1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, p = 0.023), but not the MLSI ( p > 0.05). In the static and dynamic postural stability tests in each group, there were no significant differences between the involved and uninvolved side knees ( p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the knee muscle strength between the two groups ( p > 0.05). All postural stability showed no significant correlation with knee muscle strength ( p > 0.05).
Conclusion
Dynamic postural stability was poorer in patients with ACL rupture combined with LM tear than in those with MM tear. Therefore, close monitoring for postural stability would be necessary during preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, especially for patients with ACL rupture combined with LM tear. Level of evidence: Level III:

Keyword

Anterior cruciate ligament tear; Meniscus tear; Postural stability; Knee muscle strength
Full Text Links
  • KSRR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr