Acute Crit Care.  2020 Aug;35(3):179-188. 10.4266/acc.2020.00136.

Decision-making regarding withdrawal of lifesustaining treatment and the role of intensivists in the intensive care unit: a single-center study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Neurology and Critical Care Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
This study examined the experience of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in patients hospitalized in the intensive care units (ICUs) of a tertiary care center. It also considers the role that intensivists play in the decision-making process regarding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 227 patients who decided to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment while hospitalized at Ewha Womans University Medical Center Mokdong between April 9 and December 31, 2018.
Results
The 227 hospitalized patients included in the analysis withheld or withdrew from life-sustaining treatment. The department in which life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn most frequently was hemato-oncology (26.4%). Among these patients, the most common diagnosis was gastrointestinal tract cancer (29.1%). A majority of patients (64.3%) chose not to receive any life-sustaining treatment. Of the 80 patients in the ICU, intensivists participated in the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in 34 cases. There were higher proportions of treatment withdrawal and ICU-to-ward transfers among the cases in whom intensivists participated in decision making compared to those cases in whom intensivists did not participate (50.0% vs. 4.3% and 52.9% vs. 19.6%, respectively).
Conclusions
Through their participation in end-of-life discussions, intensivists can help patients’ families to make decisions about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and possibly avoiding futile treatments for these patients.

Keyword

euthanasia; intensive care units; resuscitation orders; terminal care; withholding treatment

Cited by  2 articles

Changes in the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and after implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act
Hyunjae Im, Hyun Woo Choe, Seung-Young Oh, Ho Geol Ryu, Hannah Lee
Acute Crit Care. 2022;37(2):237-246.    doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.01095.

Comparison of factors influencing the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in intensive care unit patients after implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act in Korea
Claire Junga Kim, Kyung Sook Hong, Sooyoung Cho, Jin Park
Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(2):294-303.    doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.01130.


Reference

1. Luce JM. End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182:6–11.
Article
2. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32:638–43.
Article
3. Curtis JR, Vincent JL. Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet. 2010; 376:1347–53.
Article
4. Azoulay E, Metnitz B, Sprung CL, Timsit JF, Lemaire F, Bauer P, et al. End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35:623–30.
Article
5. Park SY. Decisions on life-sustaining treatment at the end of life. Korean J Med. 2018; 93:75–9.
Article
6. Lee YS. Euthanasia: a misunderstood term. J Korean Med Assoc. 2012; 55:1163–70.
Article
7. Choi K. Legal and ethical issues regarding end-of-life care in Korea. Dev Soc. 2016; 45:151–64.
8. Baek MS, Koh Y, Hong SB, Lim CM, Huh JW. Effect of timing of do-not-resuscitate orders on the clinical outcome of critically ill patients. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2016; 31:229–35.
Article
9. Park JH, Koh SO, Cho JS, Na S. Evaluation of informed consent for withholding and withdrawal of life support in Korean intensive care units. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015; 30:73–81.
Article
10. Shin K, Mok JH, Lee SH, Kim EJ, Seok NR, Ryu SS, et al. The current status of medical decision-making for dying patients in a medical intensive care unit: a single-center study. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014; 29:160–5.
Article
11. Kranidiotis G, Gerovasili V, Tasoulis A, Tripodaki E, Vasileiadis I, Magira E, et al. End-of-life decisions in Greek intensive care units: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care. 2010; 14:R228.
Article
12. Phua J, Joynt GM, Nishimura M, Deng Y, Myatra SN, Chan YH, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Asia. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175:363–71.
Article
13. Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27:1626–33.
14. Yaguchi A, Truog RD, Curtis JR, Luce JM, Levy MM, Mélot C, et al. International differences in end-of-life attitudes in the intensive care unit: results of a survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165:1970–5.
15. Kwon I, Koh Y, Yun YH, Heo DS, Seo SY, Kim H, et al. A study of the attitudes of patients, family members, and physicians toward the withdrawal of medical treatment for terminal patients in Korea. Korean J Med Ethics. 2010; 13:1–16.
16. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, et al. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA. 2003; 290:790–7.
17. Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, Cassell J, Cox P, Hill N, et al. Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30:770–84.
18. Khandelwal N, Engelberg RA, Benkeser DC, Coe NB, Curtis JR. End-of-life expenditure in the ICU and perceived quality of dying. Chest. 2014; 146:1594–603.
Article
19. Gruenberg DA, Shelton W, Rose SL, Rutter AE, Socaris S, McGee G. Factors influencing length of stay in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2006; 15:502–9.
Article
20. Ahrens T, Yancey V, Kollef M. Improving family communications at the end of life: implications for length of stay in the intensive care unit and resource use. Am J Crit Care. 2003; 12:317–23.
Article
21. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, Haas CE, Luce JM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:953–63.
22. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:469–78.
Article
23. McDonagh JR, Elliott TB, Engelberg RA, Treece PD, Shannon SE, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Family satisfaction with family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: increased proportion of family speech is associated with increased satisfaction. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32:1484–8.
Article
24. Siegel MD. End-of-life decision making in the ICU. Clin Chest Med. 2009; 30:181–94.
Article
25. Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010; 376:1339–46.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr