Korean J Orthod.  2020 Jul;50(4):258-267. 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.4.258.

Three-dimensional evaluation of the correlation between lip canting and craniofacial planes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Private Practice, Uijeongbu, Korea

Abstract


Objective
This study aimed to analyze the correlation of horizontal and sagittal planes used in two-dimensional diagnosis with lip canting by using threedimensional (3D) analysis.
Methods
Fifty-two patients (25 men, 27 women; average age: 24 years) undergoing treatment for dentofacial deformity were enrolled. Computed tomography images were acquired, and digital imaging and communication in medicine files were reconstructed into a 3D virtual model wherein horizontal and sagittal craniofacial planes were measured. Subsequently, the correlations of lip canting with these horizontal and sagittal planes were investigated.
Results
The mandibular symmetry plane, the occlusal plane, Camper’s plane, the mandibular plane, Broadbent’s plane, and the nasal axis plane were correlated with the amount of lip canting (Pearson’s correlation coefficients: 0.761, 0.648, 0.556, 0.526, 0.438, and 0.406, respectively). Planes associated with the lower part of the face showed the strongest correlations; the strength of the correlations decreased in the midfacial and cranial regions. None of the planes showed statistically significant differences between patients with clinical lip canting (> 3°) and those without prominent lip canting.
Conclusions
The findings of this study suggest that lip canting is strongly correlated with the mandibular symmetry plane, which includes menton deviation. This finding may have clinical implications with regard to the treatment of patients requiring correction of lip canting. Further studies are necessary for evaluating changes in lip canting after orthognathic surgery.

Keyword

Three-dimensional cephalometrics; Three-dimensional diagnosis; Lip canting, Facial asymmetry

Figure

  • Figure 1 Craniofacial anatomical landmarks used for defining the craniofacial planes evaluated in the present study. A, Hard tissue landmarks. B, Soft tissue landmarks. Rt, Right; Lt, left. See Table 1 for definitions of the other landmarks.

  • Figure 2 Horizontal planes associated with the cranium (a, Broadbent’s plane = sella–nasion plane; b, optical axis plane). Rt, Right; Lt, left; MidON, mid optic nerve.

  • Figure 3 Horizontal and sagittal planes associated with the midface. a, His’ plane; b, Frankfort horizontal plane; c, Camper’s plane; d, occlusal plane; e, nasal axis plane. Rt, Right; Lt, left. See Table 1 for definitions of the other landmarks.

  • Figure 4 Horizontal and sagittal planes associated with the lower face. a, Mandibular plane; b, lip canting plane; c, mandibular symmetry plane. Rt, Right; Lt, left. See Table 1 for definitions of the other landmarks.

  • Figure 5 Reference planes used for measurement of the interplanar angle. a, Frankfort horizontal plane; b, N-perpendicular plane; c, midsagittal plane. Rt, Right; Lt, left; MidPo, mid-porion.

  • Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the method used for measuring the angle between two planes. FH plane, Frankfort horizontal plane.


Reference

1. Cohen MM Jr, Richieri-Costa A, Guion-Almeida ML, Saavedra D. 1995; Hypertelorism: interorbital growth, measurements, and pathogenetic considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 24:387–95. DOI: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80465-5. PMID: 8636632.
Article
2. Huang CS, Liu XQ, Chen YR. 2013; Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults. Orthod Craniofac Res. 16:97–104. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12010. PMID: 23324075.
Article
3. Kim SJ, Choi JY, Baek SH. 2012; Evaluation of canting correction of the maxillary transverse occlusal plane and change of the lip canting in Class III two-jaw orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 82:1092–7. DOI: 10.2319/011512-36.1. PMID: 22515938.
Article
4. Choi JY, Choi JP, Lee YK, Baek SH. 2010; Simultaneous correction of hard- and soft-tissue facial asymmetry: combination of orthognathic surgery and face lift using a resorbable fixation device. J Craniofac Surg. 21:363–70. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf6119. PMID: 20186082.
5. Kim YH, Jeon J, Rhee JT, Hong J. 2010; Change of lip cant after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 68:1106–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.030. PMID: 20202735.
Article
6. Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB. 1997; Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 55:811–6. discussion 817DOI: 10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90338-4.
Article
7. Chu EA, Farrag TY, Ishii LE, Byrne PJ. 2011; Threshold of visual perception of facial asymmetry in a facial paralysis model. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 13:14–9. DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2010.101. PMID: 21242426.
Article
8. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. 2003; Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 124:4–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00306-8.
Article
9. Song WC, Koh KS, Kim SH, Hu KS, Kim HJ, Park JC, et al. 2007; Horizontal angular asymmetry of the face in korean young adults with reference to the eye and mouth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 65:2164–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.018. PMID: 17954309.
Article
10. Gazit-Rappaport T, Weinreb M, Gazit E. 2003; Quantitative evaluation of lip symmetry in functional asymmetry. Eur J Orthod. 25:443–50. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.5.443. PMID: 14609011.
Article
11. Trpkova B, Major P, Nebbe B, Prasad N. 2000; Craniofacial asymmetry and temporomandibular joint internal derangement in female adolescents: a posteroanterior cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 70:81–8. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0081:CAATJI>2.0.CO;2. PMID: 10730679.
12. Lee MS, Chung DH, Lee JW, Cha KS. 2010; Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 138:23–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.029. PMID: 20620830.
Article
13. Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. 2009; Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 136:312.e1–10. discussion 312–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.018. PMID: 19732656. PMCID: PMC2753840.
Article
14. Lonic D, Sundoro A, Lin HH, Lin PJ, Lo LJ. 2017; Selection of a horizontal reference plane in 3D evaluation: Identifying facial asymmetry and occlusal cant in orthognathic surgery planning. Sci Rep. 7:2157. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02250-w. PMID: 28526831. PMCID: PMC5438408.
Article
15. Trpkova B, Prasad NG, Lam EW, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. 2003; Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 123:512–20. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(02)57034-7. PMID: 12750669.
Article
16. De Riu G, Meloni SM, Baj A, Corda A, Soma D, Tullio A. 2014; Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery for correction of facial asymmetry: results of a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 52:251–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.12.010. PMID: 24418178.
Article
17. Kang YH, Kim BC, Park KR, Yon JY, Kim HJ, Tak HJ, et al. 2012; Visual pathway-related horizontal reference plane for three-dimensional craniofacial analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 15:245–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2012.01551.x. PMID: 23020695.
Article
18. Lahori M, Nagrath R, Malik N. 2013; A cephalometric study on the relationship between the occlusal plane, ala-tragus and Camper's lines in subjects with Angle's Class I, Class II and Class III occlusion. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 13:494–8. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0215-9. PMID: 24431781. PMCID: PMC3792321.
Article
19. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Tartaglia G. 1994; Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 52:1126–32. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90528-2. PMID: 7965306.
Article
20. Cho JH, Kim EJ, Kim BC, Cho KH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. 2007; Correlations of frontal lip-line canting with craniofacial morphology and muscular activity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 132:278.e7–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.015. PMID: 17826591.
Article
21. Hwang HS, Youn IS, Lee KH, Lim HJ. 2007; Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 132:279.e1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.017. PMID: 17826592.
Article
22. Tuncer BB, Ataç MS, Yüksel S. 2009; A case report comparing 3-D evaluation in the diagnosis and treatment planning of hemimandibular hyperplasia with conventional radiography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 37:312–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.01.004. PMID: 19289289.
Article
23. Terajima M, Nakasima A, Aoki Y, Goto TK, Tokumori K, Mori N, et al. 2009; A 3-dimensional method for analyzing the morphology of patients with maxillofacial deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 136:857–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.019. PMID: 19962610.
Article
24. Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. 1995; Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod. 65:233–9. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0233:MFQFAI>2.0.CO;2. PMID: 7639437.
25. Marinetti CJ. 1999; The lower muscular balance of the face used to lift labial commissures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 104:1153–62. discussion 1163–4. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199909040-00042.
Article
26. Freudlsperger C, Rückschloß T, Ristow O, Bodem J, Kargus S, Seeberger R, et al. 2017; Effect of occlusal plane correction on lip cant in two-jaw orthognathic surgery - a three-dimensional analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 45:1026–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.03.014. PMID: 28446369.
Article
27. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G. 1993; Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 103:327–37. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70013-E. PMID: 8480698.
Article
28. Yogosawa F. 1990; Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 60:199–206. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1990)060<0199:PSTPCC>2.0.CO;2. PMID: 2389852.
29. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. 1991; Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod. 61:43–8. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0043:SAIEPF>2.0.CO;2. PMID: 2012321.
30. Van Hemelen G, Van Genechten M, Renier L, Desmedt M, Verbruggen E, Nadjmi N. 2015; Three-dimensional virtual planning in orthognathic surgery enhances the accuracy of soft tissue prediction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 43:918–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.006. PMID: 26027866.
Article
31. Choi YK, Park SB, Kim YI, Son WS. 2013; Three-dimensional evaluation of midfacial asymmetry in patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate by cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 43:113–9. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.113. PMID: 23814705. PMCID: PMC3694202.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJOD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr