Korean J Transplant.  2020 Jun;34(2):78-83. 10.4285/kjt.2020.34.2.78.

Ethical issues in uterine transplantation

• Koplin JJ
• Kendal E

• KMID: 2503883
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4285/kjt.2020.34.2.78

Abstract

Despite a recent surge of bioethical attention, ethical analysis of uterine transplantation is still in its early stages, and many of the key ethical issues remain underexamined and unresolved. In this paper, we briefly review some key ethical issues associated with uterine transplantation (beyond those associated with organ transplantation more generally). We structure our discussion in terms of Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of biomedical ethics: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. Our review highlights some ethical questions that require further bioethical attention before uterine transplantation can be fully embraced as a potential treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. We close by arguing that the costs and benefits of uterine transplantation need to be considered in the context of other possible treatments for absolute uterine factor infertility and alternative methods of family creation.

Keyword

Organ transplantation; Medical ethics; Pregnancy; Infertility; Bioethics; Allocation

Reference

1. Grady D. 2020. Medical first: a transplant of a uterus. N Y Times Web;p. A1. p. A11.

2. Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. 2015; Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 385:607–16. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61728-1. PMID: 25301505.

3. Jones BP, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J, Diaz-Garcia C, et al. 2019; Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG. 126:1310–9. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15863. PMID: 31410987.

4. Horvat M, Iltis A. 2019; What are good guidelines for evaluating uterus transplantation? AMA J Ethics. 21:E988–95. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.988. PMID: 31742548.

5. Testa G, Johannesson L. 2017; The ethical challenges of uterus transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 22:593–7. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000467. PMID: 28857844.

6. Johannesson L, Järvholm S. 2016; Uterus transplantation: current progress and future prospects. Int J Womens Health. 8:43–51. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S75635. PMID: 26917976. PMCID: PMC4751897.

7. Sampson A, Kimberly LL, Goldman KN, Keefe DL, Quinn GP. 2019; Uterus transplantation in women who are genetically XY. J Med Ethics. 45:687–9. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105222. PMID: 30803984.

8. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. Oxford University Press;New York, NY:

9. Catsanos R, Rogers W, Lotz M. 2013; The ethics of uterus transplantation. Bioethics. 27:65–73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01897.x. PMID: 21726265.

10. Arora KS, Blake V. 2014; Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges. J Med Ethics. 40:396–400. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101400. PMID: 23760727.

11. Brock DW. 1995; The non-identity problem and genetic harms: the case of wrongful handicaps. Bioethics. 9:269–75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00361.x. PMID: 11653042.

12. Orentlicher D. 2012; Toward acceptance of uterus transplants. Hastings Cent Rep. 42:12–3. DOI: 10.1002/hast.90. PMID: 23138365.

13. O'Donovan L, Williams NJ, Wilkinson S. 2019; Ethical and policy issues raised by uterus transplants. Br Med Bull. 131:19–28. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldz022. PMID: 31504233. PMCID: PMC6821981.

14. Meyers DT. 2001; The rush to motherhood: pronatalist discourse and women's autonomy. Signs. 26:735–73. DOI: 10.1086/495627.

15. Hammond-Browning N. 2019; UK criteria for uterus transplantation: a review. BJOG. 126:1320–6. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15844. PMID: 31215750.

16. Wilkinson S, Williams NJ. 2016; Should uterus transplants be publicly funded? J Med Ethics. 42:559–65. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102999. PMID: 26670671. PMCID: PMC5013100.

17. Fauser BC, Boivin J, Barri PN, Tarlatzis BC, Schmidt L, Levy-Toledano R. 2019; Beliefs, attitudes and funding of assisted reproductive technology: public perception of over 6,000 respondents from 6 European countries. PLoS One. 14:e0211150. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211150. PMID: 30682152. PMCID: PMC6347360.

18. Kendal E. 2015. Equal opportunity and the case for state sponsored ectogenesis. Palgrave Macmillan;New York, NY: DOI: 10.1057/9781137549877. PMCID: PMC4820294.

19. Testa G, Koon EC, Johannesson L. 2017; Living donor uterus transplant and surrogacy: ethical analysis according to the principle of equipoise. Am J Transplant. 17:912–6. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14086. PMID: 27754594.

20. Lotz M. 2018; Uterus transplantation as radical reproduction: taking the adoption alternative more seriously. Bioethics. 32:499–508. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12490. PMID: 30027611.