J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.  2020 Jun;36(2):121-127. 10.14368/jdras.2020.36.2.121.

Maxillary implant-supported fixed prosthesis engaged by distal-extension removable partial denture for 10 years: a case report

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences & Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  • 3Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Prosthodontic decision and management should be considered the patient’s aesthetic need for anterior teeth in maxillary edentulism. This case report describes 10-year clinical outcome of a maxillary edentulous patient was rehabilitated by means of an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (ISFDP) for the anterior region and a distal-extension removable partial denture (RPD) for the posterior region. The ISFDP was designed to splint 4 endosseous implants as one unit and engaged by the RPD. The edentulous mandible was restored by means of an implant-supported overdenture. Over the course, no major adverse event occurred other than wear, discoloration, and breakage of resin veneers and artificial teeth.

Keyword

edentulism, implant supported dental prosthesis; removable partial denture; dental implant; complication

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Maxillary implant-supported fixed partial denture and removable partial denture opposing mandibular implant overdenture placed, (B) Four occlusal rests were placed on premolar and molar. Ninety-gauge wrought wire retentive clasps were engaged 0.01-inch undercut. Major connector was modified palatal strap.

  • Fig. 2 No pathologic sign was shown in postoperative periapical radiographs after 30 months.

  • Fig. 3 (A) Ten-yr postoperative periapical radiographs revealing stable implants with minimal bone loss, (B) Occlusal view of edentulous maxilla demonstrating minimal tissue reaction around the implant.

  • Fig. 4 (A) Ten-yr postoperative periapical radiographs revealing stable implants with minimal bone loss, (B) Occlusal view of edentulous maxilla demonstrating minimal tissue reaction around the implant.


Reference

References

1. Lewis S, Sharma A, Nishimura R. 1992; Treatment of edentulous maxillae with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 68:503–8. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90419-B. PMID: 1432770.
2. Mericske-Stern R. 1998; Treatment outcomes with implant-supported overdentures: clinical considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 79:66–73. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70196-9. PMID: 9474544.
3. Sadowsky SJ. 1997; The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: design considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 78:28–33. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70084-2.
4. Dhima M, Paulusova V, Lohse C, Salinas TJ, Carr AB. 2014; Practice-based evidence from 29-year outcome analysis of management of the edentulous jaw using osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthodont. 23:173–81. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12084. PMID: 23889912.
5. Budtz-Jörgensen E. 1994; Effects of denture-wearing habits on periodontal health of abutment teeth in patients with overdentures. J Clin Periodontol. 21:265–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00316.x. PMID: 8195443.
6. Marcus PA, Joshi A, Jones JA, Morgano SM. 1996; Complete edentulism and denture use for elders in New England. J Prosthet Dent. 76:260–6. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90169-9. PMID: 8887798.
7. Compagnoni MA, Souza RF, Marra J, Pero AC, Barbosa DB. 2007; Relationship between Candida and nocturnal denture wear: quantitative study. J Oral Rehabil. 34:600–5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01754.x. PMID: 17650170.
8. Starr NL. 2001; The distal extension case: an alternative restorative design for implant prosthetics. Int J Prosthodontics Restorative Dent. 21:61–7. PMID: 11829037.
9. Chronopoulos V, Sarafianou A, Kourtis S. 2008; The use of dental implants in combination with removable partial dentures: a case report. J Esthet Restor Dent. 20:355–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00209.x. PMID: 19120779.
10. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. 1999; Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent. 82:188–96. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1.
11. Pellecchia M, Pellecchia R, Emtiaz S. 2000; Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture connected to an anterior fixed implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 83:607–12. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107114. PMID: 10842125.
12. Na HJ, Kang DW, Son MK. 2011; Distal-extension removable partial denture with anterior implant prostheses: case report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 27:437–447.
13. Nam HS, Song KY, Park JM, Oh WS. 2012; Removable partial denture assisted by implant-retained fixed prosthesis opposing implant-retained overdenture. Gen Dent. 60:503–7. PMID: 23220305.
14. Kratochvil FJ, Caputo AA. 1974; Photoelastic analysis of pressure on teeth and bone supporting removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 32:52–61. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90098-5. PMID: 4599511.
15. Duyck J, Rønold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. 2001; The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 12:207–18. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003207.x. PMID: 11359477.
16. Drago C, Saldarriaga RL, Domagala D, Almasri R. 2010; Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: A multicenter laboratory study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 25:920–9.
17. Winter W, Mohrle S, Holst S, Karl M. 2010; Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 25:947–52. PMID: 20862408.
18. Patel D, Invest JC, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Moles DR. 2009; An analysis of the effect of a vent hole on excess cement expressed at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant crowns. J Prosthodont. 18:54–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00374.x. PMID: 19166549.
19. Daas M, Dubois G, Bonnet AS, Lipinski P, Rignon-Bret C. 2008; A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations. Med Eng Phys. 30:218–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.005. PMID: 17383925.
20. Naert I, Gizani S, Van Steenberghe D. 1998; Rigidly splinted implants in resorbed maxilla to retain a hinging overdenture: A series of clinical reports for up to 4 years. J Prosthet Dent. 79:156–64. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70210-0. PMID: 9513101.
21. Zoidis P, Polyzois G. 2013; Removable dental prosthesis splint. An occlusal device for nocturnal bruxing partial denture users. J Prosthodont. 22:652–6. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12038. PMID: 24138315.
Full Text Links
  • JDRAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr