Tuberc Respir Dis.  2020 Jul;83(3):211-217. 10.4046/trd.2019.0087.

False-Positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection: Ways to Prevent Cross- Contamination

• Asgharzadeh M
• Ozma MA
• Rashedi J
• Poor M
• Agharzadeh V
• Vegari A
• Shokouhi B
• Ganbarov K
• Ghalehlou NN
• Leylabadlo HE
• Kafil HS

• KMID: 2503306
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2019.0087

Abstract

The gold standard method for diagnosis of tuberculosis is the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through culture, but there is a probability of cross-contamination in simultaneous cultures of samples causing false-positives. This can result in delayed treatment of the underlying disease and drug side effects. In this paper, we reviewed studies on falsepositive cultures of M. tuberculosis . Rate of occurrence, effective factors, and extent of false-positives were analyzed. Ways to identify and reduce the false-positives and management of them are critical for all laboratories. In most cases, falsepositive is occurring in cases with only one positive culture but negative direct smear. The three most crucial factors in this regard are inappropriate technician function, contamination of reagents, and aerosol production. Thus, to reduce false-positives, good laboratory practice, as well as use of whole-genome sequencing or genotyping of all positive culture samples with a robust, extra pure method and rapid response, are essential for minimizing the rate of false-positives. Indeed, molecular approaches and epidemiological surveillance can provide a valuable tool besides culture to identify possible false positives.

Keyword

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; False-Positive Culture; Cross-Contamination; Genotyping