J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2019;16:35. 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.35.

Evaluation of student perceptions with 2 interprofessional assessment tools—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale—following didactic and clinical learning experiences in the United States

Abstract

Purpose
This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts.
Methods
Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year. Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart, while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly. For the baseline and post-cohort assessments, 865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS. The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the baseline and post-cohort assessments. Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores. For each score, 3 comparisons were made simultaneously: overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort, overall baseline versus post-clinical cohort, and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort. Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons.
Results
The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS, respectively. The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores. No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score.
Conclusion
The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork, roles, and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.


Reference

References

1. Zorek J, Raehl C. Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA: a comparative analysis. J Interprof Care. 2013; 27:123–130. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.718295.
Article
2. Barzansky B, Etzel SI. Medical schools in the United States, 2017-2018. JAMA. 2018; 320:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11679.
Article
3. Chen F, Delnat CC, Gardner D. The current state of academic centers for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2015; 29:497–498. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014.1002908.
Article
4. Gilligan C, Outram S, Levett-Jones T. Recommendations from recent graduates in medicine, nursing and pharmacy on improving interprofessional education in university programs: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-52.
Article
5. Willgerodt MA, Abu-Rish Blakeney E, Brock DM, Liner D, Murphy N, Zierler B. Interprofessional education and practice guide no. 4: developing and sustaining interprofessional education at an academic health center. J Interprof Care. 2015; 29:421–425. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1039117.
Article
6. West C, Graham L, Palmer RT, Miller MF, Thayer EK, Stuber ML, Awdishu L, Umoren RA, Wamsley MA, Nelson EA, Joo PA, Tysinger JW, George P, Carney PA. Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools: common practices, barriers and facilitators. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2016; 4:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2016.05.002.
Article
7. Havyer RD, Nelson DR, Wingo MT, Comfere NI, Halvorsen AJ, McDonald FS, Reed DA. Addressing the Interprofessional Collaboration Competencies of the Association of American Medical Colleges: a systematic review of assessment instruments in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2016; 91:865–888. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001053.
Article
8. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Washington (DC): Interprofessional Education Collaborative;2011.
9. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington (DC): Interprofessional Education Collaborative;2016.
10. Norris J, Carpenter JG, Eaton J, Guo JW, Lassche M, Pett MA, Blumenthal DK. Development and construct validation of the interprofessional attitudes scale. Acad Med. 2015; 90:1394–1400. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000764.
Article
11. Hollar D, Hobgood C, Foster B, Aleman M, Sawning S. Concurrent validation of CHIRP, a new instrument for measuring healthcare student attitudes towards interdisciplinary teamwork. J Appl Meas. 2012; 13:360–375.
12. Draugalis JR, Plaza CM. Best practices for survey research reports revisited: implications of target population, probability sampling, and response rate. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009; 73:142. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7308142.
Article
13. Muzyk AJ, Tew C, Thomas-Fannin A, Dayal S, Maeda R, Schramm-Sapyta N, Andolsek KM, Holmer S. An interprofessional course on substance use disorders for health professions students. Acad Med. 2017; 92:1704–1708. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001766.
Article
14. Hobgood C, Sherwood G, Frush K, Hollar D, Maynard L, Foster B, Sawning S, Woodyard D, Durham C, Wright M. Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: does the method matter?: results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19:e25. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.031732.
Article
15. Yardley S, Dornan T. Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’. Med Educ. 2012; 46:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x.
Article
16. Best Evidence Medical Education Collaboration. BEME coding sheet [Internet]. Dundee: Association for Medical Education in Europe;2012. [cited 2019 Sep 4]. Available from:http://www.bemecollaboration.org/downloads/749/beme4_appx1.pdf.
Full Text Links
  • JEEHP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr