Neurospine.  2020 Mar;17(1):164-171. 10.14245/ns.1938010.005.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A 7-Letter Coding System That Supports Decision-Making for the Surgical Approach

Affiliations
  • 1Clinic for Spine Surgery, Schoen Clinic Hamburg Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany
  • 2Spine Center, Benedictus Hospital, Tutzing, Germany
  • 3Spine Center, Schoen Clinic Munich Harlaching, München, Germany
  • 4Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
  • 5Orthopedic Department, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 6Spine Center, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  • 7Spine Center, SRH-Clinic, Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Germany
  • 8Spine Center, St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • 9University Medical Center, Spine Division, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • 10Spinal Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

Abstract


Objective
To validate with a prospective study a decision-supporting coding system for the surgical approach for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy.
Methods
Ten cases were presented on an internet platform, including clinical and imaging data. A single-approach (G1), a choice between 2 (G2), or 3 approaches (G3) were options. Senior and junior spine surgeons analyzed 7 parameters: location and extension of the compression of the spinal cord, C-spine alignment and instability, general morbidity and bone diseases, and K-line and multilevel corpectomy. For each parameter, an anterior, posterior, or combined approach was suggested. The most frequent letter or the last letter (if C) of the resulting 7-letter code (7LC) suggested the surgical approach. Each surgeon performed 2 reads per case within 8 weeks.
Results
G1: Interrater reliability between junior surgeons improved from the first read (κ = 0.40) to the second (κ = 0.76, p < 0.001) but did not change between senior surgeons (κ = 0.85). The intrarater reliability was similar for junior (κ = 0.78) and senior (κ = 0.71) surgeons. G2: Junior/senior surgeons agreed completely (58%/62%), partially (24%/23%), or did not agree (18%/15%) with the 7LC choice. G3: junior/senior surgeons agreed completely (50%/50%) or partially (50%/50%) with the 7LC choice.
Conclusion
The 7LC showed good overall reliability. Junior surgeons went through a learning curve and converged to senior surgeons in the second read. The 7LC helps less experienced surgeons to analyze, in a structured manner, the relevant clinical and imaging parameters influencing the choice of the surgical approach, rather than simply pointing out the only correct one.

Keyword

Degenerative cervical myelopathy; Anterior approach; Posterior approach; Combined approach; Multicenter study
Full Text Links
  • NS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr