Arch Craniofac Surg.  2020 Apr;21(2):99-105. 10.7181/acfs.2020.00010.

Biodegradable implants for orbital wall fracturereconstruction

• Jang HU
• Kim SY

• KMID: 2500251
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00010

Abstract

Background
Due to the different handling properties of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles/poly- L-lactic acid (uHA/PLLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL), we compared the surgical outcomes and the postoperative implantation accuracy between uHA/PLLA and PCL meshes in orbital fracture repair.
Methods
Patients undergoing orbital wall reconstruction with PCL and uHA/PLLA mesh, between 2017 and 2019, were investigated retrospectively. The anatomical accuracy of the implant in bony defect replacement and the functional outcomes such as diplopia, ocular motility, and enophthalmos were evaluated.
Results
No restriction of eye movement was reported in any patient (n = 30 for each group), 6 months postoperatively. In the PCL group, no patient showed diplopia or enophthalmos, while the uHA/PLLA group showed two patients with diplopia and one with enophthalmos. Excellent anatomical accuracy of implants was observed in 27 and 22 patients of the PCL and uHA/PLLA groups, respectively. However, this study showed that there were neither any significant differences in the surgical outcomes like diplopia and enophthalmos nor any complications with the two well-known implants.
Conclusion
PCL implants and uHA/PLLA implants are safe and have similar levels of complications and surgical outcomes in orbital wall reconstruction.

Keyword

Absorbable implants; Enophthalmos; Orbital fractures