Healthc Inform Res.  2020 Jan;26(1):1-2. 10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.1.

Research and Publication Ethics in Academia

• Chang H

• KMID: 2469394
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.1

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Ethics*
Publications*

Reference

1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals [Internet]. [place unknown]: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors;c2020. cited at 2020 Jan 10. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/.

2. Committee on Publication Ethics. Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing [Internet]. Hampshire, UK: Committee on Publication Ethics;2019. cited at 2020 Jan 10. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principlestransparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing.

3. World Association of Medical Editors. Policies for medical journal editors [Internet]. Bellagio, Italy: World Association of Medical Editors;c2016. cited at 2020 Jan 10. Available from: http://www.wame.org/policies.

4. iThenticate. Crossref similarity check powered by iThenticate [Internet]. Oakland (CA): iThenticate;c2019. cited at 2020 Jan 10. Available from: http://www.ithenticate.com/products/crossref-similarity-check.

5. iThenticate. CrossCheck plagiarism screening: understanding the similarity score [Internet]. Oakland (CA): iThenticate;2011. cited at 2020 Jan 10. Available from: http://www.ithenticate.com/plagiarism-detection-blog/bid/63534/CrossCheck-Plagiarism-Screening-Understanding-the-Similarity-Score.

6. Gotzsche PC, Hrobjartsson A, Johansen HK, Haahr MT, Altman DG, Chan AW. Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(1):e19.

7. Wager E. Authors, ghosts, damned lies, and statisticians. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(1):e34.