Korean Circ J.  2020 Feb;50(2):145-147. 10.4070/kcj.2019.0389.

The Operator Volume of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Does Not Guarantee Its Quality in Korea

• Yoon CH

• KMID: 2468040
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2019.0389

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Korea*
Myocardial Infarction*
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention*

Reference

1. Armstrong EJ. Endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischemia. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2017; 6:xi.

2. McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Dickens JD Jr, et al. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA. 2000; 284:3139–3144.

3. Fanaroff AC, Zakroysky P, Dai D, et al. Outcomes of PCI in relation to procedural characteristics and operator volumes in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69:2913–2924.

4. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:e44–122.

5. Lee JH, Kim U, Lee CH. Effect of operator volume on in-hospital outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: based on the 2014 cohort of Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (K-PCI) registry. Korean Circ J. 2020; 50:133–144.

6. Sim DS, Jeong MH. Differences in the Korea acute myocardial infarction registry compared with western registries. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:811–822.