J Clin Neurol.  2020 Jan;16(1):90-95. 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.1.90.

Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Changes Related to Sleep Stage and Body Position in Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Upward and Downward Titration: An Experimental Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea. jknam0266@naver.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to determine how the sleep stage and body position influence the effective pressure (Peff) in standard upward titration and experimental downward titration.
METHODS
This study applied successful manual titration of continuous positive airway pressure over 3 hours [including at least 15 min in supine rapid eye movement (REM) sleep] followed by consecutive downward titration for at least 1 hour to 22 patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. We analyzed baseline polysomnography variables and compared the effective pressures (Peff1(upward) and Peff2(downward)) between non-REM and REM sleep and between supine and lateral positions using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS
During upward titration, Peff1 increased during REM sleep compared to non-REM sleep [9.5±2.9 vs. 8.9±2.7 cm Hâ‚‚O (mean±SD), ΔPeff1(REM-non-REM)=0.6±1.1 cm Hâ‚‚O; p=0.024]. During downward titration, Peff2 was higher in a supine than a lateral position (7.3±1.7 vs. 4.8±1.5 cm Hâ‚‚O, ΔPeff2(supine-lateral)=2.5±1.3 cm Hâ‚‚O; p=0.068). When comparing both upward and downward titration conditions, we found that Peff2 was significantly lower than Peff1 in all sleep stages, especially during REM sleep (Peff1(REM) vs. Peff2(REM)=9.5±2.9 vs. 7.4±3.3 cm Hâ‚‚O) with an overall difference of 2.1±1.7 cm Hâ‚‚O (p < 0.001). Peff in supine sleep decreased from 9.4±3.0 cm Hâ‚‚O (Peff1(supine)) to 7.6±3.3 cm Hâ‚‚O (Peff2(supine)), with an overall difference of 1.8±1.6 cm Hâ‚‚O (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
This study has revealed that the collapsibility of the upper airway is influenced by sleep stage and body position. After achieving an initial Peff1, a lower pressure was acceptable to maintain airway patency during the rest of the sleep. The observed pressure decrease may support the use of an automated titration device that integrates real-time positional and sleep-stage factors, and the use of a lower pressure may improve fixed-pressure-related intolerance.

Keyword

obstructive sleep apnea; continuous positive airway pressure; sleep position; sleep stages

MeSH Terms

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
Humans
Polysomnography
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive*
Sleep Stages*
Sleep, REM

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of Peff during CPAP upward and downward titration (A: Non-REM, B: REM, C: Supine position). Data are mean and standarderror values. *p<0.05 (A–C). CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure, Peff: effective pressure, REM: rapid eye movement.


Reference

1. Oksenberg A, Silverberg DS, Arons E, Radwan H. The sleep supine position has a major effect on optimal nasal continuous positive airway pressure : relationship with rapid eye movements and non-rapid eye movements sleep, body mass index, respiratory disturbance index, and age. Chest. 1999; 116:1000–1006.
Article
2. Condos R, Norman RG, Krishnasamy I, Peduzzi N, Goldring RM, Rapoport DM. Flow limitation as a noninvasive assessment of residual upper-airway resistance during continuous positive airway pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150:475–480.
Article
3. Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, Gozal D, Iber C, Kapur VK, et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012; 8:597–619.
4. Kushida CA, Chediak A, Berry RB, Brown LK, Gozal D, Iber C, et al. Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008; 4:157–171.
5. Mador MJ, Kufel TJ, Magalang UJ, Rajesh SK, Watwe V, Grant BJ. Prevalence of positional sleep apnea in patients undergoing polysomnography. Chest. 2005; 128:2130–2137.
Article
6. Isono S, Tanaka A, Nishino T. Lateral position decreases collapsibility of the passive pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97:780–785.
Article
7. Penzel T, Möller M, Becker HF, Knaack L, Peter JH. Effect of sleep position and sleep stage on the collapsibility of the upper airways in patients with sleep apnea. Sleep. 2001; 24:90–95.
Article
8. Pevernagie DA, Shepard JW Jr. Relations between sleep stage, posture and effective nasal CPAP levels in OSA. Sleep. 1992; 15:162–167.
Article
9. Bureau MP, Sériès F. Comparison of two in-laboratory titration methods to determine effective pressure levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax. 2000; 55:741–745.
Article
10. Nolan GM, Doherty LS, Mc Nicholas WT. Auto-adjusting versus fixed positive pressure therapy in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep. 2007; 30:189–194.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr