Anat Biol Anthropol.  2019 Dec;32(4):151-157. 10.11637/aba.2019.32.4.151.

Anatomical Classification of Plantaris Tendon according to Shape and Location of Insertion in Korean

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Korea. jhpark@kangwon.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University of Medicine, Korea.
  • 3Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Catholic University, Korea.

Abstract

The plantaris muscle is a small muscle with a short belly and long thin tendon that forms part of the posterior superficial compartment of the calf. The purpose of this study was to classify the insertion type of plantaris tendon of Korean population, to measure anthropological characteristics by measuring the width and thickness, and to obtain clinically applicable anatomical basis data. The dissection was performed on 68 lower limbs (34 right, 34 left) fixed in formalin mixture. The types of insertion of plantaris tendon was classified according to the area and location of insertion into calcaneal tuberosity and calcaneal bone. In this study, all five types were identified. 25 limbs (36.8%) were classified into type 1, 8 limbs (11.8%) into types 2 and 3 respectively, 5 limbs (7.4%) into type 4, 18 lower extremities (26.5%) into type 5. The plantaris tendon was found to be absent in 4 lower limbs (5.9%). No differences in body side or gender were found in the insertion type of plantaris tendon. The thickness of the plantaris tendon was 0.72±0.27 mm for males and 0.59±0.18 mm for females, and males were thicker than females(p=0.029). However, there was no difference between the two genders in the width of the plantaris tendon. In conclusion, this study not only examined the morphological characteristics of plantaris tendon in Korean population, but also presented basic anatomical data that doctors can apply to clinical practice.

Keyword

Plantaris muscle; Plantaris tendon; Insertion type; Tendon thickness; Tendon width

MeSH Terms

Classification*
Extremities
Female
Formaldehyde
Humans
Lower Extremity
Male
Muscle, Skeletal
Tendons*
Formaldehyde

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Schematic representation of the major types of the plantaris tendon insertion. Medial view of the right leg with the plantaris tendon. Olewnik et al. (2017) classified into 5 types of PT insertion by location and area inserted in calcaneal tuberosity. (A) Type 1, fan-shaped insertion to the calcaneal tuberosity on the medial side of the calcaneal tendon; (B) Type 2, insertion to the calcaneal tuberosity, along with the calcaneal tendon (Fan shape is not taken); (C) Type 3, insertion at the calcaneal bone, anterior to the calcaneal tendon; (D) Type 4, insertion not being located on the calcaneal tuberosity but rather in the deep crural fascia; (E) Type 5, very wide insertion encircling the posterior and medial surfaces of the calcaneal tendon. PT: plantaris tendon, CT: calcaneal tendon. Black arrow indicates plantaris tendon.

  • Fig. 2 Location of extension points(ExP) for measuring width and thickness in plantaris muscles. The plantaris muscle was extracted from the right leg. extension point (black arrow) is the point at which the distal tendon begins to expand before its insertion. PM: plantaris muscle, bPM: belly of plantaris muscle, tPM: tendon of plantaris muscle, ExP: extension point.

  • Fig. 3 Types of insertion of the plantaris tendon. Medial view of the right leg with the plantaris tendon. (A) Type 1 (36.8%); (B) Type 2 (11.8%); (C) Type 3 (11.8%); (D) Type 4 (7.4%); (E) Type 5 (26.5%). PT: plantaris tendon, CT: calcaneal tendon, ExP: extension point. Black arrow indicates plantaris tendon.


Reference

1. Aragão JA, Reis FP, Guerra DR, Cabral RH. The occurrence of the plantaris muscle and its muscle-tendon relationship in adult human cadavers. Int J Morphol. 2010; 28:255–258.
Article
2. Olewnik L, Wysiadecki G, Polguj M, Topol M. Anatomic study suggests that the morphology of the plantaris tendon may be related to achilles tendonitis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 39:69–75.
Article
3. Olewnik L, Wysiadecki G, Podgórski M, Polguj M, Topol M. The plantaris muscle tendon and its relationship with the achilles tendinopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2018; DOI: 10.1155/2018/9623579.
Article
4. Allard JC, Bancroft J, Porter G. Imaging of plantaris muscle rupture. Clin Imaging. 1992; 16:55–58.
Article
5. Spang C, Alfredson H, Docking SI, Masci L, Andersson G. The plantaris tendon: a narrative review focusing on anatomical features and clinical importance. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B:1312–1319.
6. White WL. The unique, accessible and useful plantaris tendon. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1960; 25:133–141.
Article
7. Richard LD, Wayne V, Adam WM. Gray's anatomy for students. 3th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone;2013. p. 621–623.
8. Harvey FJ, Chu G, Harvey PM. Surgical availability of the plantaris tendon. J Hand Surg Am. 1983; 8:243–247.
Article
9. Van Sterkenburg MN, Van Dijk CN. Mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: why painful? An evidence-based philosophy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19:1367–1375.
Article
10. Lintz F, Higgs A, Millett M, Barton T, Raghuvanshi M, Adams MA, et al. The role of plantaris longus in Achilles tendinopathy: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 17:252–255.
Article
11. Van Sterkenburg MN, Kerkhoffs GM, Van Dijk CN. Good outcome after stripping the plantaris tendon in patients with chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19:1362–1366.
Article
12. Jackson JB III, Philippi MT, Kolz CW, Suter T, Henninger HB. Characterization of plantaris tendon constructs for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35:922–928.
Article
13. Alfredson H. Midportion Achilles tendinosis and the plantaris tendon. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45:1023–1025.
Article
14. Yammine K, Saghie S, Assi C. A meta-analysis of the surgical availability and morphology of the plantaris tendon. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019; 24:208–218.
Article
15. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33:159–174.
Article
16. Dos Santos MA, Bertelli JA, Kechele PR, Duarte H. Anatomical study of the plantaris tendon: reliability as a tendo-osseous graft. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31:59–61.
Article
17. Cummins EJ, Anson BJ. The structure of the calcaneal tendon (of achilles) in relation to orthopedic surgery with additional observation on the plantaris muscle. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946; 83:107–116.
18. Li Q, Xu J, Zhang D. Vascularized plantaris tendon graft: anatomic study of the donor. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000; 16:287–290.
Article
19. Nayak SR, Krishnamurthy A, Ramanathan L, Ranade AV, Prabhu LV, Jiji PJ, et al. Anatomy of plantaris muscle: a study in adult Indians. Clin Ter. 2010; 161:249–252.
20. Alagoz MS, Uysal AC, Tuccar E, Tekdemir I. Morphologic assessment of the tendon graft donor sites: palmaris longus, plantaris, tensor fascia lata. J Craniofac Surg. 2008; 19:246–250.
21. Ahmed N, Sarwari KN. Morphological variations and surgical importance of the plantaris muscle in humans. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci. 2013; 3:342–346.
22. Wehbe MA. Tendon graft donor sites. J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17:1130–1132.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ABA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr