Ann Surg Treat Res.  2020 Jan;98(1):31-43. 10.4174/astr.2020.98.1.31.

Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jckim@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
As robotic surgery is increasingly performed in patients with colorectal diseases, understanding proper port placement for robotic colorectal surgery is necessary. This review summarizes current port placement during robotic surgery for colorectal diseases and provides future perspective on port placements.
METHODS
PubMed were searched from January 2009 to December 2018 using a combination of the search terms "robotic" [MeSH], "colon" [MeSH], "rectum" [MeSH], "colorectal" [MeSH], and "colorectal surgery" [MeSH]. Studies related to port placement were identified and included in the current study if they used the da Vinci S, Si, or Xi robotic system and if they described port placement.
RESULTS
This review included 77 studies including a total of 3,145 operations. Fifty studies described port placement for left-sided and mesorectal excision; 17, 3, and 7 studies assessed port placement for right-sided colectomy, rectopexy, transanal surgery, respectively; and one study assessed surgery with reduced port placement. Recent literatures show that the single-docking technique included mobilization of the second and third robotic arms for the different parts without movement of patient cart and similar to previous dual or triple-docking technique. Besides, use of the da Vinci Xi system allowed a more simplified port configuration.
CONCLUSION
Robot-assisted colorectal surgery can be efficiently achieved with successful port placement without movement of patient cart dependent on the type of surgery and the robotic system.

Keyword

Colon; Rectum; Robotics; Robotic surgical procedure; Surgery

MeSH Terms

Arm
Colectomy
Colon
Colorectal Surgery
Humans
Rectum
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A diagram of literature search and selection.

  • Fig. 2 Port placement for robotic total mesorectal excision (A–D) or left-sided colectomy (A, B) using the da Vinci S, Si, or Xi system. (A) Port placement for hybrid technique including laparoscopic splenic flexure or left colon mobilization. (B) Double docking port placement with movement of the patient cart according to the dissection area. (C) Single-docking port placement including the rotation of robotic arms without movement of patient cart. (D) Port placement recommended by the manufacturer using the da Vinci Xi system. Port placement for robotic right-sided colectomy (E–G) and ventral mesh rectopexy (H). (E) Reversed-L-shaped port placement with minor variation using the da Vinci S or Si system. (F) Suprapubic port placement with wound extension between the 2 suprapubic ports for the extraction of the specimen. (G) Port placement that was recommended by the manufacturer using the da Vinci Xi system. (H) Port placement with minor variations for robotic ventral mesh rectopexy that was focused on the pelvic dissection. Extraordinary port placement. (I) Reduced port placement for anterior resection using single-site platform with an additional port. (J) Universal port placement for all 4-quadrant colorectal surgery. R1, arm 1 for monopolar scissors or cautery hook; R2, arm 2 for Maryland or Fenestrated bipolar forceps; R3, arm 3 for tip-up fenestrated grasper or Cadiere forceps; A, assistant port; C, camera port; ASIS, anterior superior iliac supine; MCL, mid-clavicular line; SF, dissection for splenic flexure; P, dissection for pelvis; Docking, placement of the patient cart; S, single-site platform.


Reference

1. Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002; 12:46–51.
Article
2. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45:1689–1694.
Article
3. Biffi R, Luca F, Bianchi PP, Cenciarelli S, Petz W, Monsellato I, et al. Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: current status and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22:546–556.
Article
4. Isik O, Gorgun E. How has the robot contributed to colon cancer surgery? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015; 28:220–227.
Article
5. Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50:1825–1830.
6. Tebala GD. History of colorectal surgery: a comprehensive historical review from the ancient Egyptians to the surgical robot. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30:723–748.
7. Melich G, Pai A, Shoela R, Kochar K, Patel S, Park J, et al. Rectal dissection simulator for da vinci surgery: details of simulator manufacturing with evidence of construct, face, and content validity. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61:514–519.
Article
8. Makin GB, Breen DJ, Monson JR. The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2001; 7:612–621.
Article
9. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017; 318:1569–1580.
10. Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22:1601–1608.
11. Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, et al. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29:558–568.
Article
12. Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJ, Kim J, Woo SU. Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52:1824–1830.
Article
13. Ngu JC, Sim S, Yusof S, Ng CY, Wong AS. Insight into the da Vinci® Xi - technical notes for single-docking left-sided colorectal procedures. Int J Med Robot. 2017; 13:e1798.
Article
14. DeNoto G, Rubach E, Ravikumar TS. A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006; 16:551–556.
Article
15. Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:855–860.
Article
16. Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Diaz-Pavon JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28:815–821.
Article
17. Parra-Davila E, Diaz-Hernandez JJ. Totally robotic left colectomy. J Robot Surg. 2011; 5:57–64.
Article
18. Protyniak B, Jorden J, Farmer R. Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison. J Robot Surg. 2018; 12:67–74.
Article
19. Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D'Isidoro C, et al. Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®. Int J Med Robot. 2017; 03. 13(13):[Epub]. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1728.
Article
20. Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 Years of robotic surgery. World J Surg. 2016; 40:2550–2557.
Article
21. Lee HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Woo IT, et al. A novel robotic right colectomy for colon cancer via the suprapubic approach using the da Vinci Xi system: initial clinical experience. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018; 94:83–87.
Article
22. Reitz ACW, Lin E, Rosen SA. A single surgeon's experience transitioning to robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32:3525–3532.
Article
23. Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Ricci F, Listorti C, Cirocchi R, et al. Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28:807–814.
Article
24. Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Choi WH, Ryuk JP. Robot-assisted right colectomy with lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: technical considerations. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012; 22:e271–e276.
25. Chouillard E, Chahine E, Khoury G, Vinson-Bonnet B, Gumbs A, Azoulay D, et al. NOTES total mesorectal excision (TME) for patients with rectal neoplasia: a preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28:3150–3157.
Article
26. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 18:473–480.
Article
27. Verheijen PM, Consten EC, Broeders IA. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: experience with a first case. Int J Med Robot. 2014; 10:423–426.
Article
28. Gomez Ruiz M, Parra IM, Palazuelos CM, Martin JA, Fernandez CC, Diego JC, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58:145–153.
29. Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Tong YS, Chen CC. Combined robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (R-taTME) and single-site plus one-port (R-SSPO) technique for ultra-low rectal surgery-initial experience with a new operation approach. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017; 32:249–254.
Article
30. Kim JC. A universal port design for the da Vinci Xi® system allowing access to the entire colon for colorectal cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114:1029–1030.
Article
31. Ng KH, Lim YK, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Eu KW. Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50:763–767.
32. Prasad LM, deSouza AL, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Abcarian H. Robotic pursestring technique in low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53:230–234.
Article
33. Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, Marecik S, Park J, Abcarian H. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg. 2010; 34:1954–1958.
Article
34. Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Haas EM. A three-arm (laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic) matched-case analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54:144–150.
Article
35. Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N, Rubach E, Zemon H, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:956–963.
Article
36. Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:240–248.
Article
37. Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Haas EM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:199–206.
Article
38. Koh DC, Tsang CB, Kim SH. A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:1945–1952.
Article
39. Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19:2485–2493.
Article
40. Shin JY. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012; 28:19–26.
Article
41. Park JA, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY. Initial clinical experience with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012; 28:265–270.
Article
42. Zawadzki M, Velchuru VR, Albalawi SA, Park JJ, Marecik S, Prasad LM. Is hybrid robotic laparoscopic assistance the ideal approach for restorative rectal cancer dissection? Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15:1026–1032.
Article
43. Kenawadekar RD, Dhange RZ, Pandit A, Bandawar MS, Joshi S, Agarwal G, et al. Robot-assisted low anterior resection in fifty-three consecutive patients: an Indian experience. J Robot Surg. 2013; 7:311–316.
Article
44. Parisi A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Ricci F, Farinacci F, et al. Robotic rectal resection for cancer: a prospective cohort study to analyze surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes. Int J Surg. 2014; 12:1456–1461.
Article
45. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon's experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57:1066–1074.
46. Liang JT, Lai HS. Surgical technique of robotic D3 lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery and autonomic nerves for the treatment of distal rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28:1727–1733.
Article
47. Kuo LJ, Lin YK, Chang CC, Tai CJ, Chiou JF, Chang YJ. Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014; 29:555–562.
Article
48. Sawada H, Egi H, Hattori M, Suzuki T, Shimomura M, Tanabe K, et al. Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case-control study. World J Surg Oncol. 2015; 13:103.
Article
49. Gorgun E, Aytac E, Gurland B, Costedio MM. Case-matched comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: initial institutional experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015; 25:e148–e151.
50. Bae SU, Min BS, Kim NK. Robotic low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for rectal cancer using the firefly technique. Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56:1028–1035.
Article
51. Huang CW, Yeh YS, Ma CJ, Choy TK, Huang MY, Huang CM, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery for laparoscopic surgeons with limited experience: preliminary experiences for 40 consecutive cases at a single medical center. BMC Surg. 2015; 15:73.
Article
52. Pai A, Marecik SJ, Park JJ, Melich G, Sulo S, Prasad LM. Oncologic and clinicopathologic outcomes of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58:659–667.
Article
53. Eftaiha SM, Pai A, Sulo S, Park JJ, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ. Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016; 59:607–614.
Article
54. Kim YS, Kim MJ, Park SC, Sohn DK, Kim DY, Chang HJ, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: case-matched study of short-term outcomes. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48:225–231.
Article
55. Zaghloul AS, Mahmoud AM. Preliminary results of robotic colorectal surgery at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2016; 28:169–174.
Article
56. Rencuzogullari A, Gorgun E, Costedio M, Aytac E, Kessler H, Abbas MA, et al. Case-matched comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016; 26:e37–e40.
Article
57. Luca F, Valvo M, Guerra-Cogorno M, Simo D, Blesa-Sierra E, Biffi R, et al. Functional results of robotic total intersphincteric resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42:841–847.
Article
58. Gorgun E, Ozben V, Costedio M, Stocchi L, Kalady M, Remzi F. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 18:1063–1071.
Article
59. Gomez Ruiz M, Alonso Martin J, Cagigas Fernandez C, Martin Parra JI, Real Noval H, Martin Rivas B, et al. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Our experience after 198 consecutive cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42:848–854.
60. Kim CN, Bae SU, Lee SG, Yang SH, Hyun IG, Jang JH, et al. Clinical and oncologic outcomes of totally robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial results in a center for minimally invasive surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016; 31:843–852.
Article
61. Ahmed J, Siddiqi N, Khan L, Kuzu A, Parvaiz A. Standardized technique for single-docking robotic rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2016; 18:O380–O384.
Article
62. Huang YM, Huang YJ, Wei PL. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96:e8171.
Article
63. Oldani A, Bellora P, Monni M, Amato B, Gentilli S. Colorectal surgery in elderly patients: our experience with DaVinci Xi® System. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017; 29:Suppl 1. 91–99.
Article
64. Pesi B, Annecchiarico M, Amore Bonapasta S, Nerini A, Perna F, Bencini L, et al. Robotic rectal resection with a single-docking technique thanks to the rotation of the R3 arm. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017; 27:e18–e21.
Article
65. Huang CW, Tsai HL, Yeh YS, Su WC, Huang MY, Huang CM, et al. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer. BMC Surg. 2017; 17:126.
Article
66. Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Huang YJ, Lin YK, Chen CC, Tong YS, et al. Anorectal complications after robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31:4466–4471.
Article
67. Panteleimonitis S, Harper M, Hall S, Figueiredo N, Qureshi T, Parvaiz A. Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note. J Robot Surg. 2018; 12:433–436.
Article
68. Nolan HR, Smith BE, Honaker MD. Operative time and length of stay is similar between robotic assisted and laparoscopic colon and rectal resections. J Robot Surg. 2018; 12:659–664.
Article
69. Aselmann H, Kersebaum JN, Bernsmeier A, Beckmann JH, Moller T, Egberts JH, et al. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach-report of a single-center experience. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018; 33:1575–1581.
Article
70. Debakey Y, Zaghloul A, Farag A, Mahmoud A, Elattar I. Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer surgery, first egyptian academic center experience, RCT. Minim Invasive Surg. 2018; 2018:5836562.
Article
71. Cassini D, Depalma N, Grieco M, Cirocchi R, Manoochehri F, Baldazzi G. Robotic pelvic dissection as surgical treatment of complicated diverticulitis in elective settings: a comparative study with fully laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc. 2019; 33:2583–2590.
Article
72. Ishihara S, Kiyomatsu T, Kawai K, Tanaka T, Hata K, Kazama S, et al. The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018; 33:1047–1055.
Article
73. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, Pozzi S, Faso FL, Ravizza D, et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16:1274–1278.
Article
74. Bae SU, Baek SJ, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Min BS. Robotic left colon cancer resection: a dual docking technique that maximizes splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29:1303–1309.
Article
75. Maciel V, Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Zeichen M, Mata W, Jorge I, et al. Diverticular disease complicated with colovesical fistula: laparoscopic versus robotic management. Int Surg. 2014; 99:203–210.
Article
76. Kim JC, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Park IJ, Lim SB. Robotic left colectomy with complete mesocolectomy for splenic flexure and descending colon cancer, compared with a laparoscopic procedure. Int J Med Robot. 2018; 14:e1918.
Article
77. deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53:1000–1006.
Article
78. D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:2856–2862.
79. Huettner F, Pacheco PE, Doubet JL, Ryan MJ, Dynda DI, Crawford DL. One hundred and two consecutive robotic-assisted minimally invasive colectomies--an outcome and technical update. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15:1195–1204.
Article
80. Luca F, Ghezzi TL, Valvo M, Cenciarelli S, Pozzi S, Radice D, et al. Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011; 7:298–303.
Article
81. Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg. 2012; 99:1219–1226.
Article
82. Lujan HJ, Maciel VH, Romero R, Plasencia G. Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: a single surgeon's experience. J Robot Surg. 2013; 7:95–102.
Article
83. Zawadzki M, Rzaca M, Czarnecki R, Obuszko Z, Jacyna K, Stewart L, et al. Beginning robotic assisted colorectal surgery - it's harder than it looks! Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014; 9:562–568.
Article
84. Megevand JL, Amboldi M, Lillo E, Lenisa L, Ganio E, Ambrosi A, et al. Right colectomy: consecutive 100 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique for malignancy. Cumulative experience in a single centre. Updates Surg. 2019; 71:151–156.
Article
85. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Ris F, Volonte F, Morel P, Roche B. Early experience with robotic rectopexy. Int J Med Robot. 2013; 9:e61–e65.
Article
86. Mantoo S, Podevin J, Regenet N, Rigaud J, Lehur PA, Meurette G. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation? Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15:e469–e475.
Article
87. Mehmood RK, Parker J, Bhuvimanian L, Qasem E, Mohammed AA, Zeeshan M, et al. Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014; 29:1113–1118.
Article
88. Inaba CS, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Koh CY, Jafari MD, Mills SD, Carmichael JC, et al. Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience. Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21:667–671.
Article
89. Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, Tuynman JB, Mortensen NJ. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. Br J Surg. 2014; 101:578–581.
Article
90. Ngu JC, Kuo LJ, Kung CH, Chen CL, Kuo CC, Chang SW, et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer after clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Int J Med Robot. 2018; 14:e1948.
Article
91. Arnott S, Skancke M, Obias V. Robotic transanal microsurgery for high early rectal neoplasia (T0-T1, N0 lesions), case series of 10 patients. Int J Med Robot. 2018; 14:e1956.
Article
92. Tomassi MJ, Taller J, Yuhan R, Ruan JH, Klaristenfeld DD. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for the excision of rectal neoplasia: clinical experience with 58 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019; 62:279–285.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr