J Periodontal Implant Sci.  2018 Aug;48(4):213-223. 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.4.213.

Factors affecting treatment outcomes in patients with oral lichen planus lesions: a retrospective study of 113 cases

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 2Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. pilyoung@snubh.org
  • 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Conservative Dentistry, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic oral mucosal disease that has been recognized as an immune condition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the clinical outcomes of topical corticosteroid application on OLP lesions using dexamethasone gargle and ointment.
METHODS
The charts of patients who were clinically diagnosed with OLP and treated with dexamethasone from July 2003 to August 2017 at the Section of Dentistry of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were thoroughly evaluated to identify subjects who were suitable for this retrospective study. For each patient, age at the index date, gender, medical history, and dental records related to OLP lesions and dexamethasone treatment were reviewed.
RESULTS
In total, 113 of the 225 patients were included in the present study. Among them, 79 patients were female (69.9%) and 34 were male (30.1%), with a mean age of 57.6 years. The average duration of dexamethasone treatment was 4.7 months and the mean follow-up period was 2.24 years. Improvements were observed within 1 year after dexamethasone treatment in most cases, and 17.7% of patients had a new OLP lesion after treatment. New OLP lesions were more frequently gingival than mucosal, although mucosal OLP lesions were more common than gingival OLP lesions in all age groups. In age- and gender-adjusted multivariate logistic regression, a history of malignant disease was found to be a significant factor affecting the formation of new lesions. Gingival OLP lesions and intermittent use of dexamethasone showed near-significant associations. In Kaplan-Meier failure analysis, history of malignancy, menopausal status, age, and the site of the OLP lesion were significant factors affecting clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
The treatment outcomes of OLP were significantly influenced by age, history of malignancy, menopausal status, and the site of the OLP lesion, but not by factors related to dexamethasone treatment.

Keyword

Corticosteroid methanetriol mixture; Logistic models; Oral lichen planus; Retrospective studies; Survival analysis

MeSH Terms

Dental Records
Dentistry
Dexamethasone
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lichen Planus, Oral*
Logistic Models
Male
Retrospective Studies*
Seoul
Survival Analysis
Dexamethasone

Figure

  • Figure 1 Distribution of OLP lesions in this study. (A) Distribution of OLP lesions according to site (number of patients, percentile to total), (B) distribution of OLP lesions according to patients' age (number of patients) and rate of new lesion formation in gingival and mucosal lesions (percentile), (C) histogram of clinical outcomes according to follow-up duration (days). OLP: oral lichen planus.

  • Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing failure estimates. The time to new lesion formation or expansion of OLP was calculated from the index date to the date when a new lesion was observed. The pattern of dexamethasone use and mode of dexamethasone treatment did not significantly influence the time to failure (P=0.234 and P=0.789, respectively). However, a history of malignancy significantly affected the time to failure (P=0.008). Menopause showed a near-significant relationship (P=0.039). Younger patients had a higher failure rate than elderly patients (P=0.013). The location of the OLP lesion was a significant factor affecting new lesion formation or lesion expansion (P=0.049). OLP: oral lichen planus.


Reference

1. Alrashdan MS, Cirillo N, McCullough M. Oral lichen planus: a literature review and update. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016; 308:539–551.
Article
2. McCartan BE, Healy CM. The reported prevalence of oral lichen planus: a review and critique. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008; 37:447–453.
Article
3. Kurago ZB. Etiology and pathogenesis of oral lichen planus: an overview. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 122:72–80.
Article
4. Dissemond J. Oral lichen planus: an overview. J Dermatolog Treat. 2004; 15:136–140.
Article
5. Naylor GD. Treating erosive lichen planus with griseofulvin: a report of four cases. Quintessence Int. 1990; 21:943–947.
6. Carrozzo M, Gandolfo S. The management of oral lichen planus. Oral Dis. 1999; 5:196–205.
Article
7. McCreary CE, McCartan BE. Clinical management of oral lichen planus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 37:338–343.
Article
8. Scully C, Beyli M, Ferreiro MC, Ficarra G, Gill Y, Griffiths M, et al. Update on oral lichen planus: etiopathogenesis and management. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998; 9:86–122.
Article
9. Hambly JL, Haywood A, Hattingh L, Nair RG. Comparison between self-formulation and compounded-formulation dexamethasone mouth rinse for oral lichen planus: a pilot, randomized, cross-over trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017; 8:e12225.
Article
10. Pedersen A, Klausen B. Glucocorticosteroids and oral medicine. J Oral Pathol. 1984; 13:1–15.
Article
11. Roopashree MR, Gondhalekar RV, Shashikanth MC, George J, Thippeswamy SH, Shukla A. Pathogenesis of oral lichen planus--a review. J Oral Pathol Med. 2010; 39:729–734.
12. Singh N, Scully C, Joyston-Bechal S. Oral complications of cancer therapies: prevention and management. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1996; 8:15–24.
Article
13. Lockhart PB, Sonis ST. Alterations in the oral mucosa caused by chemotherapeutic agents. A histologic study. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1981; 7:1019–1025.
14. Lamey PJ, Gibson J, Barclay SC, Miller S. Grinspan's syndrome: a drug-induced phenomenon? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 70:184–185.
Article
15. Lavaee F, Majd M. Evaluation of the association between oral lichen planus and hypothyroidism: a retrospective comparative study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016; 17:38–42.
16. Li D, Li J, Li C, Chen Q, Hua H. The association of thyroid disease and oral lichen planus: a literature review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017; 8:310.
Article
17. Eisen D. The clinical features, malignant potential, and systemic associations of oral lichen planus: a study of 723 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002; 46:207–214.
Article
18. Scully C, el-Kom M. Lichen planus: review and update on pathogenesis. J Oral Pathol. 1985; 14:431–458.
Article
19. Mignogna MD, Lo Russo L, Fedele S. Gingival involvement of oral lichen planus in a series of 700 patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32:1029–1033.
Article
20. Holmstrup P, Schiøtz AW, Westergaard J. Effect of dental plaque control on gingival lichen planus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 69:585–590.
Article
21. Guiglia R, Di Liberto C, Pizzo G, Picone L, Lo Muzio L, Gallo PD, et al. A combined treatment regimen for desquamative gingivitis in patients with oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol Med. 2007; 36:110–116.
Article
22. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. Application of a motivation-behavioral skills protocol in gingival lichen planus: a short-term study. J Periodontol. 2010; 81:1449–1454.
Article
23. Petersilka GJ, Arweiler NB, Otto J, Wittig T. Non-interventional study to collect data for the application of lidocaine gel 2% during scaling and root planing and professional mechanical plaque removal. Clin Oral Investig. Forthcoming. 2018.
Article
24. Al-Hashimi I, Schifter M, Lockhart PB, Wray D, Brennan M, Migliorati CA, et al. Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103 Suppl:S25.e1–S25.e12.
Article
25. van der Meij EH, Schepman KP, van der Waal I. The possible premalignant character of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 96:164–171.
Article
26. Fitzpatrick SG, Hirsch SA, Gordon SC. The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145:45–56.
Article
27. Cheng YS, Gould A, Kurago Z, Fantasia J, Muller S. Diagnosis of oral lichen planus: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 122:332–354.
Article
28. Gonzalez-Moles MA, Scully C, Gil-Montoya JA. Oral lichen planus: controversies surrounding malignant transformation. Oral Dis. 2008; 14:229–243.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPIS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr