Korean J Leg Med.  2019 Nov;43(4):144-152. 10.7580/kjlm.2019.43.4.144.

Sex Discrimination Using the Index and Ring Finger Lengths in Ukwuani People of Nigeria

• Eboh DE

• KMID: 2464492
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.7580/kjlm.2019.43.4.144

Abstract

The biological profile of a person is crucial in the forensic anthropology casework; and sexual dimorphism of the index and ring fingers makes them a vital tool for sex prediction. This study was undertaken to predict the sex of an individual from the index and ring finger lengths, and index-ring finger length ratio in the Ukwuani of Nigeria. It was a cross-sectional study involving all the indigenous Ukwuani secondary school students and members of staff within Ukwuani local government area that utilized 200 male and 200 female adolescents and 68 male and 83 female adults based on the systematic random sampling technique. The index and ring finger lengths were measured and the index:ring finger ratio calculated. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistics version 23.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistics used were mean, standard deviation, t test, Pearson's correlation, and discriminant function analysis. Males showed statistically longer absolute finger lengths than females. The left index:ring finger ratio in adolescents was significantly greater in females than males, but the others were not. There were significant paired sample correlations in both age groups. There was no significant correlation between age and finger lengths, and ratios. The overall accuracy of the discriminant functions was higher and better for the finger lengths than for the finger ratios that were moderate. This study showed that the index and ring finger lengths can be used as tools to predict the sex of an individual using the discriminant function analysis in a medico-legal situation.

Keyword

Discriminant analysis; Fingers; Forensic anthropology; Nigeria; Sex determination

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Discriminant Analysis
Female
Fingers*
Forensic Anthropology
Humans
Local Government
Male
Nigeria*
Sexism*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Measurement landmarks of index and ring fingers. IF, index finger; RF, ring finger; X, tip of index finger; Y, proximal crease of ring finger; W, proximal crease of index finger; Z, tip of ring finger.

Reference

1. Austin D, King RE. The biological profile of unidentified human remains in a forensic context. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016; 6:370–390.

2. Christensen AM, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ. Forensic anthropology: current methods and practice. San Diego: Academic Press;2014. p. 1–18.

3. Sen J, Kanchan T, Ghosh A, et al. Estimation of sex from index and ring finger lengths in an indigenous population of Eastern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9:HC01–HC05.

4. Macaluso PJ Jr. The efficacy of sternal measurements for sex estimation in South African blacks. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 202:111.

5. Basic Z, Anteric I, Vilovic K, et al. Sex determination in skeletal remains from the medieval Eastern Adriatic coast - discriminant function analysis of humeri. Croat Med J. 2013; 54:272–278.

6. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Sharma A, et al. A study of correlation of hand and foot dimensions for personal identification in mass disasters. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 199:112.

7. Uzun O, Oksuz CE, Zihni NB, et al. Sex estimation from index and ring finger lengths in Turkish population. J Clin Diagn. 2019; 13:AC01–AC06.

8. Dey S, Kapoor AK. Digit ratio (2D:4D) - A forensic marker for sexual dimorphism in North Indian population. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016; 6:422–428.

9. Ibrahim MA, Khalifa AM, Hagras AM, et al. Sex determination from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in North Saudi population: medicolegal view. Egyptian J Forensic Sci. 2016; 6:435–444.

10. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Asha N, et al. Estimation of sex from index and ring finger in a North Indian population. J. Forensic Leg Med. 2013; 20:471–479.

11. Aboul-Hagag KE, Mohamed SA, Hilal MA, et al. Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in upper Egyptians. Egyptian J Forensic Sci. 2011; 1:80–86.

12. Kanchan T, Kumar GP, Menezes RG. Index and ring finger ratio- A new sex determinant in south Indian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 181:53.

13. Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, et al. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and levels of testosterone, LH and estrogen. Human Reprod. 1998; 13:3000–3004.

14. Setiya M, Jehan M, Godwin R, et al. Sexual dimorphism of digit ratio (2D:4D) in Madhya Pradesh. Int J Sci Study. 2017; 4:155–159.

15. Kyriakidis I, Papaioannidou P. Epidemiologic study of the sexually dimorphic second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Greek population. Coll Antropol. 2008; 32:1093–1098.

16. Eachus P. Finger length, digit ratio and gender differences in sensation seeking and internet self-efficacy. Issues Inf Sci Inf Technol. 2007; 4:691–701.

17. Manning JT, Stewart A, Bundred PE, et al. Sex and ethnic differences in the 2nd to 4th digit ratio in children. Early Hum Dev. 2004; 80:161–168.

18. Kanchan T, Rastogi P. Sex determination from hand dimensions of North and South Indians. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54:546–550.

19. Li C, Jia M, Ma Y, et al. The relationship between digit ratio and sexual orientation in a Chinese Yunnan Han population. Pers Individ Differ. 2016; 101:26–29.

20. Ebeye OA. Anthropometric study of the 2D:4D digits ratio in Urhobo people of Southern Nigeria. Int J Forensic Med Invest. 2017; 3:9–15.

21. Ibegbu AO, Danjuma ZC, Hamman WO, et al. Anthropometric study of the index (2nd) and ring (4th) digits in Ebira ethnic group of Nigeria. Asian J Med Sci. 2007; 4:79–84.

22. Gabriel SO, Hakeem BF, Ezon-Ebidor E, et al. Second to fourth digit ratio in Nigerian Igbos and Yorubas. Sci Res Essay. 2009; 4:1146–1148.

23. Nkejiaka C. Emergency of ethnic militia movements in the Niger Delta region: from voice to armed struggle in the new democratic era (1999-till present) [dissertation]. Budapest: Central European University;2010.

24. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ. 2001; 79:373–374.

25. Arroyo M, Freire M, Ansotegui L, et al. Intraobserver error associated with anthropometric measurements made by dietitians. Nutr Hosp. 2010; 25:1053–1056.

26. Ulijaszek SJ, Lourie JA. Intra- and inter-observer error in anthropometric measurement. In : Ulijaszek SJ, Mascie-Taylor CG, editors. Anthropometry: the individual and the population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;1994. p. 30–55.

27. Landau S, Everitt BS. A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS [Internet]. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press;2004. cited 2019 May 20. Available from: http://www.academia.dk/BiologiskAntropologi/Epidemiologi/PDF/SPSS_Statistical_Analyses_using_SPSS.pdf.

28. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Asha N. Estimation of stature from index and ring finger length in a North Indian adolescent population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012; 19:285–290.

29. Gillam L, McDonald R, Ebling FJ, et al. Human 2D (index) and 4D (ring) finger lengths and ratios: cross-sectional data on linear growth patterns, sexual dimorphism and lateral asymmetry from 4 to 60 years of age. J Anat. 2008; 213:325–335.

30. Williams TJ, Pepitone ME, Christensen SE, et al. Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature. 2000; 404:455–456.

31. Buck JJ, Williams RM, Hughes IA, et al. , In-utero androgen exposure and 2nd to 4th digit length ratio-comparisons between healthy controls and females with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18:976–979.

32. Fink B, Manning JT, Neave N, et al. Second to fourth digit ratio and hand skill in Austrian children. Biol Psychol. 2004; 67:375–384.