1. Martin-Harris B, Jones B. The videofluorographic swallowing study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008; 19:769–785. PMID:
18940640.
Article
2. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988; 2:216–219. PMID:
3251697.
Article
3. Kim JY, Koh ES, Kim HR, Chun SM, Lee SU, Jung SH. The diagnostic usefulness of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:14–22.
4. Kelly AM, Leslie P, Beale T, Payten C, Drinnan MJ. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006; 31:425–432. PMID:
17014453.
Article
5. ECRI Health Technology Assessment Group. Diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders (dysphagia) in acute-care stroke patients. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999; (8):1–6.
6. Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007; 117:1723–1727. PMID:
17906496.
Article
7. Rao N, Brady SL, Chaudhuri G, Donzelli JJ, Wesling MW. Gold-standard? Analysis of the videofluoroscopic and fiberoptic endoscopic swallow examinations. J Appl Res. 2003; 3:89–96.
8. Pisegna JM, Langmore SE. Parameters of instrumental swallowing evaluations: describing a diagnostic dilemma. Dysphagia. 2016; 31:462–472. PMID:
26987971.
Article
9. Wu CH, Hsiao TY, Chen JC, Chang YC, Lee SY. Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107:396–401. PMID:
9121321.
Article
10. Langmore S. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Thieme;2011.
11. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996; 11:93–98. PMID:
8721066.
Article
12. Pearson WG Jr, Molfenter SM, Smith ZM, Steele CM. Image-based measurement of post-swallow residue: the normalized residue ratio scale. Dysphagia. 2013; 28:167–177. PMID:
23089830.
Article
13. Neubauer PD, Rademaker AW, Leder SB. The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: an anatomically defined and image-based tool. Dysphagia. 2015; 30:521–528. PMID:
26050238.
Article
14. Neubauer PD, Hersey DP, Leder SB. Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales based on fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2016; 31:352–359. PMID:
26753927.
Article
15. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991; 100:678–681. PMID:
1872520.
Article
16. Langmore SE. Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 11:485–489. PMID:
14631184.
Article
17. Hiss SG, Postma GN. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Laryngoscope. 2003; 113:1386–1393. PMID:
12897564.
Article
18. McCullough GH, Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Coyle JL, Wood JL. Ordinality and intervality of a penetration-aspiration scale. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 1998; 6:65–72.
19. Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees(R)) using the penetration-aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002; 17:308–315. PMID:
12355146.
20. Smith CH, Logemann JA, Colangelo LA, Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR. Incidence and patient characteristics associated with silent aspiration in the acute care setting. Dysphagia. 1999; 14:1–7. PMID:
9828268.
Article