Clin Orthop Surg.  2019 Dec;11(4):445-452. 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.445.

Reliability of the Instability Severity Index Score as a Predictor of Recurrence after Arthroscopic Anterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daegu Chamtntn Hospital, Daegu, Korea. oseo@hanmail.net
  • 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sheikh Khalifa Specialty Hospital, Ras al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
  • 6Shoulder and Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Although the instability severity index score (ISIS) is widely used to predict recurrence after arthroscopic anterior instability surgery, its reliability, especially on the weightings and cutoff values, is questionable. The goal of the current retrospective study was to investigate recurrence after arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction to evaluate whether each domain of the ISIS has the appropriate predictive power for recurrence by using logistic regression analyses with odds ratios (ORs).
METHODS
This study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction between 2004 and 2016. We retrospectively reviewed patients' preoperative history and radiographs, postoperative recurrence or sensation of instability, and risk factors related to the ISIS. The mean postoperative follow-up was 27.6 months (range, 12 to 96 months; median, 21 months). Twenty-six patients with recurrence or positive apprehension were classified as the recurrence group; 94 patients without any symptoms were classified as the non-recurrence group. Logistic regression analyses with ORs were used to verify the utility of each domain of the ISIS for predicting recurrence.
RESULTS
The mean ISIS did not differ significantly between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups (4.3 ± 1.8 vs. 3.4 ± 2.1 points; p = 0.063). Among the domains of ISIS, factors related to bone defects, the presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion and glenoid bone loss had the lowest ORs (0.77 and 0.38, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Not all ISIS domains accurately predicted recurrence after arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction. The ISIS may not be a proper reference for determining Latarjet procedure in patients with anterior shoulder instability.

Keyword

Shoulder dislocation; Instability severity index score

MeSH Terms

Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Recurrence*
Retrospective Studies*
Risk Factors
Sensation
Shoulder
Shoulder Dislocation

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Distribution of instability severity index score (ISIS) among the study population.


Reference

1. Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score: a simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(11):1470–1477. PMID: 17998184.
2. Calvo E, Granizo JJ, Fernandez-Yruegas D. Criteria for arthroscopic treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder: a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(5):677–683. PMID: 15855371.
3. Phadnis J, Arnold C, Elmorsy A, Flannery M. Utility of the instability severity index score in predicting failure after arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(8):1983–1988. PMID: 26122385.
Article
4. Rouleau DM, Hebert-Davies J, Djahangiri A, Godbout V, Pelet S, Balg F. Validation of the instability shoulder index score in a multicenter reliability study in 114 consecutive cases. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(2):278–282. PMID: 23271004.
Article
5. Carreira DS, Mazzocca AD, Oryhon J, Brown FM, Hayden JK, Romeo AA. A prospective outcome evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(5):771–777. PMID: 16627629.
6. Garofalo R, Mocci A, Moretti B, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability using knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(11):1283–1289. PMID: 16325077.
Article
7. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability: two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(7):991–1003. PMID: 10901314.
8. Hobby J, Griffin D, Dunbar M, Boileau P. Is arthroscopic surgery for stabilisation of chronic shoulder instability as effective as open surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies including 3044 arthroscopic operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(9):1188–1196. PMID: 17905956.
9. Hohmann E, Tetsworth K, Glatt V. Open versus arthroscopic surgical treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis over the past 20 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26(10):1873–1880. PMID: 28688936.
Article
10. Huerta A, Rincon G, Peidro L, Combalia A, Sastre S. Controversies in the surgical management of shoulder instability: open vs arthroscopic procedures. Open Orthop J. 2017; 11:875–881. PMID: 28979597.
Article
11. Ide J, Maeda S, Takagi K. Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors in athletes: patient selection and postoperative sports activity. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(8):1899–1905. PMID: 15572319.
12. Kim SH, Ha KI, Cho YB, Ryu BD, Oh I. Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(8):1511–1518. PMID: 12925631.
13. Dora C, Gerber C. Shoulder function after arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the glenohumeral joint using an absorbable tac. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9(4):294–298. PMID: 10979524.
Article
14. Hubbell JD, Ahmad S, Bezenoff LS, Fond J, Pettrone FA. Comparison of shoulder stabilization using arthroscopic transglenoid sutures versus open capsulolabral repairs: a 5-year minimum follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(3):650–654. PMID: 15090380.
15. Charousset C, Beauthier V, Bellaiche L, et al. Can we improve radiological analysis of osseous lesions in chronic anterior shoulder instability? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96(8 Suppl):S88–S93. PMID: 21035420.
Article
16. Bouliane M, Saliken D, Beaupre LA, Silveira A, Saraswat MK, Sheps DM. Evaluation of the instability severity index score and the western Ontario shoulder instability index as predictors of failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96(12):1688–1692. PMID: 25452374.
Article
17. Voos JE, Livermore RW, Feeley BT, et al. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic bankart repairs for anterior instability. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(2):302–307. PMID: 20028847.
Article
18. Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(8):1755–1763. PMID: 16882898.
Article
19. Thomazeau H, Courage O, Barth J, et al. Can we improve the indication for Bankart arthroscopic repair? A preliminary clinical study using the ISIS score? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96(8 Suppl):S77–S83. PMID: 21035419.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr