Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2019 Nov;62(6):469-473. 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.469.

Fetal autonomic malfunction as a marker of fetal distress in growth-restricted fetuses: three case reports

Affiliations
  • 1Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine. igorlakhno71@gmail.com
  • 2Biomagnetic Center, Hans Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is characterized by fetal compromise and delayed neurological maturation. We report 3 cases of early FGR in the 26th week of gestation, based on hemodynamic Doppler monitoring, conventional cardiotocography, and non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-FECG). Fetal heart rate variability (HRV), beat-to-beat variations, and fetal autonomic brain age scores (fABASs) were normal despite the absence of umbilical diastolic flow in the first case and the pregnancy continued to 30 weeks. NI-FECG helped achieve better fetal maturity. Fetal HRV and fABASs were low in the second and third cases. Fetal demise occurred soon in both cases. We conclude that NI-FECG could be a prospective method for the detection of fetal distress in early FGR.

Keyword

Fetal distress; Fetal growth restriction; Embryonic and fetal development

MeSH Terms

Brain
Cardiotocography
Electrocardiography
Embryonic and Fetal Development
Female
Fetal Death
Fetal Development
Fetal Distress*
Fetus*
Heart Rate, Fetal
Hemodynamics
Methods
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The tracing of beat-to-beat variations (an analog of the ultrasound cardiotocography curve) in case 1. Blue line is fetal beat-to-beat variatiations curve and green one is maternal. The blue line crossing the fetal heart rate pattern shows the estimated basal heart rate (baseline). The gray shaded areas show the detected accelerations and decelerations.


Cited by  1 articles

Fetal programming: could intrauterin life affect health status in adulthood?
Hande Nur Onur Öztürk, Perim Fatma Türker
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021;64(6):473-483.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.21154.


Reference

1. Hoyer D, Żebrowski J, Cysarz D, Gonçalves H, Pytlik A, Amorim-Costa C, et al. Monitoring fetal maturation-objectives, techniques and indices of autonomic function. Physiol Meas. 2017; 38:R61–88.
Article
2. Frusca T, Todros T, Lees C, Bilardo CM. TRUFFLE Investigators. Outcome in early-onset fetal growth restriction is best combining computerized fetal heart rate analysis with ductus venosus Doppler: insights from the trial of umbilical and fetal flow in Europe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218:S783–S789.
3. Fuchs T. Values of T/QRS ratio in pregnancies complicated by intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44:751–757.
Article
4. Nelson KB, Sartwelle TP, Rouse DJ. Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesarean section: assumptions versus evidence. BMJ. 2016; 355:i6405.
Article
5. David M, Hirsch M, Karin J, Toledo E, Akselrod S. An estimate of fetal autonomic state by time-frequency analysis of fetal heart rate variability. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007; 102:1057–1064.
Article
6. Fanelli A, Magenes G, Campanile M, Signorini MG. Quantitative assessment of fetal well-being through CTG recordings: a new parameter based on phase-rectified signal average. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013; 17:959–966.
Article
7. Olofsson P, Ayres-de-Campos D, Kessler J, Tendal B, Yli BM, Devoe L. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part I: the randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93:556–568.
8. Lakhno I. Fetal non-invasive electrocardiography contributes to better diagnostics of fetal distress: a cross-sectional study among patients with preeclampsia. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2015; 44:519–523.
9. Guzman-Velazquez BP, Lakhno IV, Diaz-Mendez A. In : Arabnia HR, Deligiannidis L, Tinetti FG, Tran QN, editors. HRV descriptors for fetal distress assessment in pregnancy with fetal growth restriction. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering & Science BIOENG'18; 2018 Jul 30–Aug 2; Las Vegas, NV. [place unknown]: CSREA Press;2018. p. 13–17.
10. Hoyer D, Kowalski EM, Schmidt A, Tetschke F, Nowack S, Rudolph A, et al. Fetal autonomic brain age scores, segmented heart rate variability analysis, and traditional short term variability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:948.
Article
11. Hoyer D, Tetschke F, Jaekel S, Nowack S, Witte OW, Schleußner E, et al. Fetal functional brain age assessed from universal developmental indices obtained from neuro-vegetative activity patterns. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e74431.
Article
12. Behar J, Andreotti F, Zaunseder S, Oster J, Clifford GD. A practical guide to non-invasive foetal electrocardiogram extraction and analysis. Physiol Meas. 2016; 37:R1–R35.
Article
13. Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Yi Q, Hatzmann H, Schiermeier S. Comparison of non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram to Doppler cardiotocogram during the 1st stage of labor. J Perinat Med. 2010; 38:179–185.
Article
14. Fuchs T, Grobelak K, Pomorski M, Zimmer M. Fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes in third trimester: can we obtain additional information other than CTG trace? Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016; 25:309–316.
Article
15. Velayo CL, Funamoto K, Silao JNI, Kimura Y, Nicolaides K. Evaluation of abdominal fetal electrocardiography in early intrauterine growth restriction. Front Physiol. 2017; 8:437.
Article
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr