Korean Circ J.  2019 Nov;49(11):1033-1034. 10.4070/kcj.2019.0227.

Dose Coronary Angiography Suffice for Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis?

• Ahn SG
• Lee SJ

• KMID: 2460528
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2019.0227

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Coronary Angiography*
Coronary Stenosis*

Reference

1. Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49:839–848.

2. Jang JS, Han KR, Moon KW, et al. The current status of percutaneous coronary intervention in Korea: based on year 2014 cohort of Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (K-PCI) registry. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:328–340.

3. Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:3182–3188.

4. Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NH, et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:250–259.

5. Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, et al. Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5:1029–1036.

6. Ahn SG, Suh J, Hung OY, et al. Discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: insights from intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10:999–1007.

7. Lee JM, Choi KH, Koo BK, et al. Prognostic implications of plaque characteristics and stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73:2413–2424.

8. Kim JH, Choi W, Kim KC, et al. The current status of intervention for intermediate coronary stenosis in the Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (K-PCI) registry. Korean Circ J. 2019; 49:1022–1032.

9. Gwon HC, Jeon DW, Kang HJ, et al. The practice pattern of percutaneous coronary intervention in Korea: based on year 2014 cohort of Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (K-PCI) registry. Korean Circ J. 2017; 47:320–327.

10. Ahn SG, Lee JW, Youn YJ, et al. In-hospital outcome differences between transradial and transfemoral coronary approaches: data from the Korean percutaneous coronary intervention registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; [Epub ahead of print].