J Korean Foot Ankle Soc.  2019 Sep;23(3):121-130. 10.14193/jkfas.2019.23.3.121.

Regional Variation in the Incidence of Diabetes-Related Lower Limb Amputations and Its Relationship with the Regional Factors

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University Seoul Hospital, Korea.
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Korea.
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, Soon Chun Hyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Division of Genome Research, Center for Genome Science, Korea National Institute of Health, Cheongju, Korea.
  • 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. hohotoy@nate.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate the spatial distribution of diabetes-related lower limb amputations and analyze the relationship between the spatial distribution of diabetes-related lower limb amputations and regional factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was performed based on the data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, in 2016. The unit of analysis was the administrative districts of city·gun·gu. The dependent variable was the age- and sex-adjusted incidence of diabetes-related lower limb amputations and the regional variables were selected to represent two aspects: socioeconomic factors, and health and medical factors. Along with traditional ordinary least square (OLS) regression analysis, geographically weighted regression (GWR) was applied for spatial analysis.
RESULTS
The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of diabetes-related lower limb amputation varied according to region. OLS regression showed that the incidence of diabetes-related lower limb amputation had significant relationships with the health and medical factors (number of healthcare institution and doctors per 100,000 population). In GWR, the effects of regional factors were not consistent.
CONCLUSION
The spatial distribution of the incidence of diabetes-related lower limb amputations and the effects of regional factors varied according to the regions. The regional characteristics should be considered when establishing health policy related to diabetic foot care.

Keyword

Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic foot; Amputation; Spatial analysis

MeSH Terms

Amputation*
Delivery of Health Care
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetic Foot
Health Policy
Incidence*
Insurance, Health
Lower Extremity*
Socioeconomic Factors
Spatial Analysis
Spatial Regression

Figure

  • Figure 1 Summary of research model.

  • Figure 2 Spatial distribution in the incidence of diabetes-related lower limb amputation. (A) Standardized Incidence rate of diabetes-related lower limb amputation per 100,000 population based on city, province (n=16). (B) Standardized Incidence rate of diabetes-related lower limb amputation per 100,000 population based on city, gun, gu (n=228).

  • Figure 3 Distribution of regression coefficients variables based on city, gun, gu (n=228). (A) National Health Insurance premium per capita. (B) Financial independence. (C) Number of registered car per capita. (D) Number of healthcare institution per 100,000 population. (E) Number of doctors per 100,000 population.


Reference

1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000; 321:405–412. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.
Article
2. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014; 103:137–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002.
Article
3. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2003; 361:1545–1551. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13169-8.
Article
4. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Sanders LJ, Janisse D, Pogach LM. American Diabetes Association. Preventive foot care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27 Suppl 1:S63–S64. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s63.
Article
5. Morbach S, Furchert H, Gröblinghoff U, Hoffmeier H, Kersten K, Klauke GT, et al. Long-term prognosis of diabetic foot patients and their limbs: amputation and death over the course of a decade. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35:2021–2027. DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0200.
Article
6. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87:4–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007.
Article
7. Kim JK, Jung YR, Kim KT, Shin CS, Lee KB. A report on diabetic foot and amputation from the Korean health insurance review & assessment service data. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2017; 21:66–69. DOI: 10.14193/jkfas.2017.21.2.66.
Article
8. Park SA, Ko SH, Lee SH, Cho JH, Moon SD, Jang SA, et al. Incidence of diabetic foot and associated risk factors in Type 2 diabetic patients: a five-year observational study. Korean Diabetes J. 2009; 33:315–323. DOI: 10.4093/kdj.2009.33.4.315.
Article
9. Chung CH, Kim DJ, Kim J, Kim H, Kim H, Min KW, et al. Current status of diabetic foot in Korean patients using national health insurance database. J Korean Diabetes Assoc. 2006; 30:372–376. DOI: 10.4093/jkda.2006.30.5.372.
Article
10. Bae JI, Won JH, Kim JS, Kim MD, Yoon CJ, Cho YK. Prevalence and current status of treatment of diabetic foot in South Korea. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2016; 74:169–176. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2016.74.3.169.
Article
11. Jeffcoate W, Barron E, Lomas J, Valabhji J, Young B. Using data to tackle the burden of amputation in diabetes. Lancet. 2017; 390:e29–e30. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32401-7.
Article
12. Schulz AJ, Zenk S, Odoms-Young A, Hollis-Neely T, Nwankwo R, Lockett M, et al. Healthy eating and exercising to reduce diabetes: exploring the potential of social determinants of health frameworks within the context of community-based participatory diabetes prevention. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95:645–651. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.048256.
Article
13. Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A. Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011; 40:804–818. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyr029.
Article
14. Dijkstra A, Janssen F, De Bakker M, Bos J, Lub R, Van Wissen LJ, et al. Using spatial analysis to predict health care use at the local level: a case study of type 2 diabetes medication use and its association with demographic change and socioeconomic status. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e72730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072730.
Article
15. Green C, Hoppa RD, Young TK, Blanchard JF. Geographic analysis of diabetes prevalence in an urban area. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57:551–560. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00380-5.
Article
16. Jo EK, Seo EW, Lee KS. Spatial distribution of diabetes prevalence rates and its relationship with the regional characteristics. Health Policy Manag. 2016; 26:30–38. DOI: 10.4332/KJHPA.2016.26.1.30.
Article
17. Brown AF, Ettner SL, Piette J, Weinberger M, Gregg E, Shapiro MF, et al. Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev. 2004; 26:63–77. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxh002.
Article
18. Choi HW, Park JM, Kim HW, Kim YO. Identifying spatial distribution pattern of water quality in Masan Bay using spatial autocorrelation index and Pearson's r. Ocean Polar Res. 2007; 29:391–400. DOI: 10.4217/OPR.2007.29.4.391.
Article
19. Seok HS, Kang SH. A Study on The regional variation factor of hypertension prevalence. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2013; 33:210–236. DOI: 10.15709/hswr.2013.33.3.210.
Article
20. Lee KS, Choi YJ. Analysis on the relationships between the spatial distribution of primary care organizations and socio-demographic characteristics in a metropolitan city using the geographic weighted regression method. Product Rev. 2013; 27:193–214. DOI: 10.15843/kpapr.27.2.201306.193.
Article
21. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr Anal. 1996; 28:281–298. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x.
Article
22. van Houtum WH, Lavery LA. Regional variation in the incidence of diabetes-related amputations in The Netherlands. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996; 31:125–132.
Article
23. Bocquier A, Cortaredona S, Nauleau S, Jardin M, Verger P. Prevalence of treated diabetes: geographical variations at the small-area level and their association with area-level characteristics. a multilevel analysis in Southeastern France. Diabetes Metab. 2011; 37:39–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2010.07.004.
Article
24. Connolly V, Unwin N, Sherriff P, Bilous R, Kelly W. Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000; 54:173–177. DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.3.173.
Article
25. Ha KH, Kim DJ. Current status of managing diabetes mellitus in Korea. Korean J Intern Med. 2016; 31:845–850. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.253.
Article
26. Holman N, Young RJ, Jeffcoate WJ. Variation in the recorded incidence of amputation of the lower limb in England. Diabetologia. 2012; 55:1919–1925. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-012-2468-6.
Article
27. Shaw J. Diabetes: regional variation in lower limb amputation incidence. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012; 8:386–388. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.78.
Article
28. Margolis DJ, Hoffstad O, Nafash J, Leonard CE, Freeman CP, Hennessy S, et al. Location, location, location: geographic clustering of lower-extremity amputation among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:2363–2367. DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0807.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKFAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2023 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr