Yonsei Med J.  2012 Sep;53(5):1014-1021.

Remifentanil Use in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery-An Effective Alternative to Morphine (A Retrospective Study)

Affiliations
  • 1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel, affiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. fredricag@asaf.health.gov.il
  • 2Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel, affiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
  • 3Pediatric Neurology Department, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel, affiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The unique properties of remifentanil make it ideal for pediatric use despite a lack of wide randomized clinical trials and fear of adverse events due to its high potency. We aimed to consolidate preliminary conclusions regarding the efficacy of remifentanil use in pediatric scoliosis surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The medical charts of children with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent primary spinal fusion between 1998 and 2007 at a large tertiary university-affiliated hospital were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups according to anesthetic regime (remifentanil vs. morphine). Demographic, surgery-related details and immediate postoperative course were recorded and compared.
RESULTS
All 36 remifentanil children were extubated shortly after termination of surgery, compared to 2 of the 84 patients in the morphine group. The remaining patients in the morphine group were extubated hours after surgery [5.4 hours; standard deviation (SD) 1.7 hours]. Six remifentanil children were spared routine intensive care hospitalization (vs. 2 morphine children-significant difference). Shorter surgeries [5.6 hours (SD 1.82 hours) vs. 7.14 hours (SD 2.15 hours); p=0.0004] were logged for the remifentanil group. To achieve controlled hypotension during surgery, vasodilator agents were used in the morphine group only. A comparison of early postoperative major or minor complication rates (including neurological and pulmonary complications) between the two groups yielded no significant differences.
CONCLUSION
Remifentanil use can shorten operating time and facilitate earlier spontaneous ventilation and extubation, with less of a need for intensive care hospitalization and no increase in significant complications.

Keyword

Remifentanil; morphine; idiopathic scoliosis; ICU; postoperative complications and ventilation

MeSH Terms

Child
Critical Care
Hospitalization
Humans
Hypotension, Controlled
Morphine*
Retrospective Studies*
Scoliosis*
Spinal Fusion
Vasodilator Agents
Ventilation
Morphine
Vasodilator Agents

Reference

1. Muellejans B, Matthey T, Scholpp J, Schill M. Sedation in the intensive care unit with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl: a randomised, open-label, pharmacoeconomic trial. Crit Care. 2006. 10:R91.
2. Chillemi S, Sinardi D, Marino A, Mantarro G, Campisi R. The use of remifentanil for bloodless surgical field during vertebral disc resection. Minerva Anestesiol. 2002. 68:645–649.
3. Battershill AJ, Keating GM. Remifentanil: a review of its analgesic and sedative use in the intensive care unit. Drugs. 2006. 66:365–385.
4. Hermanns H, Lipfert P, Meier S, Jetzek-Zader M, Krauspe R, Stevens MF. Cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials during spine surgery in patients with neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis under propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007. 98:362–365.
Article
5. Nathan N, Tabaraud F, Lacroix F, Mouliès D, Viviand X, Lansade A, et al. Influence of propofol concentrations on multipulse transcranial motor evoked potentials. Br J Anaesth. 2003. 91:493–497.
Article
6. Imani F, Jafarian A, Hassani V, Khan ZH. Propofol-alfentanil vs propofol-remifentanil for posterior spinal fusion including wake-up test. Br J Anaesth. 2006. 96:583–586.
Article
7. Grossfeld S, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Leonard A, Johnson L. Complications of anterior spinal surgery in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997. 17:89–95.
Article
8. Hod-Feins R, Copeliovitch L, Abu-Kishk I, Eshel G, Lotan G, Shalmon E, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome after scoliosis repair surgery: a case study and reassessment of the syndrome's pathogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007. 16:345–349.
Article
9. Sebel PS, Hoke JF, Westmoreland C, Hug CC Jr, Muir KT, Szlam F. Histamine concentrations and hemodynamic responses after remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1995. 80:990–993.
10. Unlügenç H, Itegin M, Ocal I, Ozalevli M, Güler T, Isik G. Remifentanil produces vasorelaxation in isolated rat thoracic aorta strips. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003. 47:65–69.
Article
11. Noseir RK, Ficke DJ, Kundu A, Arain SR, Ebert TJ. Sympathetic and vascular consequences from remifentanil in humans. Anesth Analg. 2003. 96:1645–1650.
Article
12. Ouattara A, Boccara G, Köckler U, Lecomte P, Leprince P, Léger P, et al. Remifentanil induces systemic arterial vasodilation in humans with a total artificial heart. Anesthesiology. 2004. 100:602–607.
Article
13. Hu ZY, Lin PT, Liu J, Liao DQ. Remifentanil induces L-type Ca2+ channel inhibition in human mesenteric arterial smooth muscle cells. Can J Anaesth. 2008. 55:238–244.
Article
14. Rosenbaum A, Kain ZN, Larsson P, Lönnqvist PA, Wolf AR. The place of premedication in pediatric practice. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009. 19:817–828.
Article
15. Canet J, Mazo V. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010. 76:138–143.
16. Gerlach K, Uhlig T, Hüppe M, Kraatz E, Saager L, Schmitz A, et al. Remifentanil-clonidine-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002. 16:703–708.
Article
17. Peng PW, Sandler AN. A review of the use of fentanyl analgesia in the management of acute pain in adults. Anesthesiology. 1999. 90:576–599.
Article
18. Egan TD. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A preliminary appraisal. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995. 29:80–94.
19. Crawford MW, Hickey C, Zaarour C, Howard A, Naser B. Development of acute opioid tolerance during infusion of remifentanil for pediatric scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006. 102:1662–1667.
Article
20. Engelhardt T, Zaarour C, Naser B, Pehora C, de Ruiter J, Howard A, et al. Intraoperative low-dose ketamine does not prevent a remifentanil-induced increase in morphine requirement after pediatric scoliosis surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008. 107:1170–1175.
Article
21. Koppert W. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia-Pathophysiology and clinical relevance. Acute Pain. 2007. 9:21–34.
Article
22. Jee YS, Hong JY. Effects of remifentanil on propofol requirements for loss of consciousness in target-controlled infusion. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008. 74:17–22.
23. Nöst R, Thiel-Ritter A, Scholz S, Hempelmann G, Müller M. Balanced anesthesia with remifentanil and desflurane: clinical considerations for dose adjustment in adults. J Opioid Manag. 2008. 4:305–309.
Article
24. Park GR, Evans TN, Hutchins J, Borissov B, Gunning KE, Klinck JR. Reducing the demand for admission to intensive care after major abdominal surgery by a change in anaesthetic practice and the use of remifentanil. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000. 17:111–119.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr