Clin Orthop Surg.  2019 Jun;11(2):200-207. 10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.200.

Failure of Dermal Allograft Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Assessment

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia. c.j.gouk.06@aberdeen.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Massive retracted rotator cuff tears represent a therapeutic dilemma, particularly in the young and middle-aged patients who are not appropriate for a reverse total shoulder replacement. Interposition grafting using human dermal allograft offers an alternative treatment.
METHODS
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent interposition grafting using human dermal allograft between December 2013 and May 2015 for massive rotator cuff tears at our tertiary referral center was performed. Preoperative and 6 month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments were performed in all patients, with postoperative graft integrity being the primary outcome measure. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Oxford shoulder score, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.
RESULTS
The mean age at the time of follow-up was 54 years. On MRI, 84% of grafts were seen to have failed at 6 months. Strength was grossly reduced on the operative side when supraspinatus and subscapularis were tested; despite this, Constant score (mean, 48.2) was comparable to that in the previous reports. DASH and Oxford scores were a mean of 24.94 and 37.16, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these results, in particular the MRI findings, we cannot advocate the use of dermal allograft as an interposition graft for the repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Keyword

Rotator cuff injuries; Acellular dermal graft tissue; Shoulder; Operative surgical procedure; Magnetic resonance imaging

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Proton density fat-saturated sagittal magnetic resonance image demonstrates the typical uniform thin low signal appearance of an intact GraftJacket (arrowhead) traversing the massive rotator cuff tear.

  • Fig. 2 An axial diagrammatic representation of the most common site of GraftJacket (GJ) failure. The coracoid process (C), subscapularis (SSc), supraspinatus (SS), and infraspinatus (IS) are labelled for orientation.

  • Fig. 3 Proton density fat-saturated axial magnetic resonance image demonstrates the typical anterior displacement of the dehiscent posterolateral GraftJacket margin (arrowheads) uncovering the humeral head (H). The coracoid process (C) and supraspinatus (SS) are labelled for orientation.

  • Fig. 4 Proton density fat-saturated sagittal magnetic resonance image demonstrates the GraftJacket (arrowhead) with the posterior deficit (arrow) commonly encountered with failure or dehiscence.


Reference

1. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(4):505–515. PMID: 10761941.
Article
2. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(5):953–960. PMID: 17473131.
3. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, Hodler J, Gerber C. The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(11):2423–2431. PMID: 18978411.
Article
4. Agrawal V. Healing rates for challenging rotator cuff tears utilizing an acellular human dermal reinforcement graft. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2012; 6(2):36–44. PMID: 22787332.
Article
5. Ely EE, Figueroa NM, Gilot GJ. Biomechanical analysis of rotator cuff repairs with extracellular matrix graft augmentation. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(9):608–614. PMID: 25350614.
Article
6. Kokkalis ZT, Mavrogenis AF, Scarlat M, et al. Human dermal allograft for massive rotator cuff tears. Orthopedics. 2014; 37(12):e1108–e1116. PMID: 25437086.
Article
7. Modi A, Singh HP, Pandey R, Armstrong A. Management of irreparable rotator cuff tears with the GraftJacket allograft as an interpositional graft. Shoulder Elbow. 2013; 5(3):188–194.
Article
8. Millstein ES, Snyder SJ. Arthroscopic evaluation and management of rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003; 34(4):507–520. PMID: 14984190.
Article
9. Sclamberg SG, Tibone JE, Itamura JM, Kasraeian S. Six-month magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of large and massive rotator cuff repairs reinforced with porcine small intestinal submucosa. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(5):538–541. PMID: 15383811.
Article
10. Moore DR, Cain EL, Schwartz ML, Clancy WG Jr. Allograft reconstruction for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(3):392–396. PMID: 16260463.
Article
11. Rhee SM, Oh JH. Bridging graft in irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: autogenic biceps graft versus allogenic dermal patch graft. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017; 9(4):497–505. PMID: 29201303.
Article
12. Modi CS, Smith CD, Drew SJ. Partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears in patients over the age of 35: etiology and intra-articular associations. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2012; 6(1):15–18. PMID: 22518075.
Article
13. Dehler T, Pennings AL, ElMaraghy AW. Dermal allograft reconstruction of a chronic pectoralis major tear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(10):e18–e22.
Article
14. Rao BM, Kamal TT, Vafaye J, Taylor L. Surgical repair of hip abductors: a new technique using Graft Jacket allograft acellular human dermal matrix. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(10):2049–2053. PMID: 22872412.
Article
15. Acevedo DC, Shore B, Mirzayan R. Orthopedic applications of acellular human dermal allograft for shoulder and elbow surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015; 46(3):377–388. PMID: 26043051.
Article
16. Shea KP, Obopilwe E, Sperling JW, Iannotti JP. A biomechanical analysis of gap formation and failure mechanics of a xenograft-reinforced rotator cuff repair in a cadaveric model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21(8):1072–1079. PMID: 22047788.
Article
17. Ono Y, Davalos Herrera DA, Woodmass JM, Boorman RS, Thornton GM, Lo IK. Graft augmentation versus bridging for large to massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2017; 33(3):673–680. PMID: 27956233.
Article
18. Bond JL, Dopirak RM, Higgins J, Burns J, Snyder SJ. Arthroscopic replacement of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears using a GraftJacket allograft: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(4):403–409. PMID: 18375271.
Article
19. Badhe SP, Lawrence TM, Smith FD, Lunn PG. An assessment of porcine dermal xenograft as an augmentation graft in the treatment of extensive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(1 Suppl):35S–39S. PMID: 18201655.
Article
20. Prickett WD, Teefey SA, Galatz LM, Calfee RP, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. Accuracy of ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff in shoulders that are painful postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A(6):1084–1089. PMID: 12784007.
Article
21. Mack LA, Nyberg DA, Matsen FR 3rd, Kilcoyne RF, Harvey D. Sonography of the postoperative shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988; 150(5):1089–1093. PMID: 3282405.
Article
22. Gupta AK, Hug K, Berkoff DJ, et al. Dermal tissue allograft for the repair of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(1):141–147. PMID: 22215726.
Article
23. Gupta AK, Hug K, Boggess B, Gavigan M, Toth AP. Massive or 2-tendon rotator cuff tears in active patients with minimal glenohumeral arthritis: clinical and radiographic outcomes of reconstruction using dermal tissue matrix xenograft. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(4):872–879. PMID: 23423315.
24. Duchman KR, Mickelson DT, Little BA, et al. Graft use in the treatment of large and massive rotator cuff tears: an overview of techniques and modes of failure with MRI correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2019; 48(1):47–55. PMID: 29978243.
Article
25. Neumann JA, Zgonis MH, Rickert KD, et al. Interposition dermal matrix xenografts: a successful alternative to traditional treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(6):1261–1268. PMID: 28141953.
Article
26. Audenaert E, Van Nuffel J, Schepens A, Verhelst M, Verdonk R. Reconstruction of massive rotator cuff lesions with a synthetic interposition graft: a prospective study of 41 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006; 14(4):360–364. PMID: 16252125.
Article
27. Jones CR, Snyder SJ. Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a solution that bridges the gap. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2015; 23(3):130–138. PMID: 26225572.
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr