Clin Endosc.  2019 Jan;52(1):87-89. 10.5946/ce.2018.080.

Multicenter Implementation of a New Electronic Medical Record System Leads to Longer Procedure Times and Poor Staff Satisfaction

• Storm AC
• Ryou M
• Thompson C

• KMID: 2438152
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.080

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Electronic Health Records*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Mean responses of endoscopy staff (physician and nurse) to each of the six survey questions shown on a Likert scale. On this scale, 1 point indicates that the parameter in question has “improved” and 5 points indicates it to be “worse” since electronic health record (EHR) implementation.

Reference

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Information Technology (HITECH Act) [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Office of the National Coordinator;c2009. [cited 2018 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/hitech_act_excerpt_from_arra_with_index.pdf.

2. Cheriff AD, Kapur AG, Qiu M, Cole CL. Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group. Int J Med Inform. 2010; 79:492–500.

3. Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016; 91:836–848.

4. Zlabek JA, Wickus JW, Mathiason MA. Early cost and safety benefits of an inpatient electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18:169–172.

5. Desai SV, Asch DA, Bellini LM, et al. Education outcomes in a duty-hour flexibility trial in internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:1494–1508.