Anesth Pain Med.  2018 Oct;13(4):427-434. 10.17085/apm.2018.13.4.427.

Appropriate angle and depth in thoracic transforaminal epidural block in Koreans

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. whlee@cnu.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Selective transforaminal epidural block has come to the for as a targetspecific modality in the treatment and diagnosis of spinal pain. Thoracic transforaminal epidural block (TTFEB) has the associated risk of pneumothorax. This article describes a retrospective study conducted using computed tomography (CT) imaging to investigate the TTFEB angle and depth appropriate to minimize the risk of pneumothorax in Koreans.
METHODS
The subjects of the present study were 100 randomly selected patients between 50 and 70 years of age found be free of thoracic disease according to chest CT performed in the present hospital. On the chest CT, the superior, middle, and inferior thoracic vertebrae were observed at the T2, T7, and T11 levels, respectively.
RESULTS
The average distance and the needle insertion angle from the skin point at which the needle may be inserted without piercing the lung to the intervertebral foramen were 117.8 ± 12.1 mm and 58.1 ± 6.1° at the T2 level, 85.6 ± 10.0 mm and 61.7 ± 4.3° at the T7 level, and 94.3 ± 8.7 mm and 64.4 ± 7.0° at the T11 level, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The needle insertion at the point further than 40 mm, on the upper, middle thorax, if the needle pass from the inner vertebral body to lamina, it could be safer. However, on the lower thorax, needle could pierce the lung though the needle start from the inner vertebral body. Thus, it can be safer if the needle pass toward the exterior margin of lamina.

Keyword

Angle; Depth; Pneumothorax; Thoracic transforaminal epidural block

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Humans
Lung
Needles
Pneumothorax
Retrospective Studies
Skin
Thoracic Diseases
Thoracic Vertebrae
Thorax
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Computed tomography images and measurement values. Ad: needle insertion distance along the line drawn from the point 40 mm external from the spinous process, grazing the exterior margin of the lamina and arriving at the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen, Alpha: needle insertion angle along the line drawn from the point 40 mm external from the spinous process, grazing the exterior margin of the lamina and arriving at the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen, Cd: needle insertion distance along the line drawn from Point X, grazing the exterior margin of the lamina and arriving at the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen, Theta: needle insertion angle along the line drawn from Point X, grazing the exterior margin of the lamina and arriving at the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen, Xd: distance from Point X to the spinous process, X: needle insertion point where the line form the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen contacts the skin without passing through the lung at the minimum angle.

  • Fig. 2 Measurements on computed tomography images at T11 level. Dd: needle insertion distance along the line drawn from Point Y to the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen without passing through the lung, Delta: needle insertion angle along the line drawn from Point Y to the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen without passing through the lung, Yd: distance from Point Y to the spinous process, Y: needle insertion point where the line from the 1/2 depth of the intervertebral foramen contacts the skin without passing through the lung at the largest angle.


Reference

REFERENCE

1. Boswell MV, Shah RV, Everett CR, Sehgal N, Mckenzie-Brown AM, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain:evidence-based practice guidelines. Pain physician. 2005; 8:1–47. PMID: 16850041.
2. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE, Cammisa F. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy:a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27:11–6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00005.
3. Manchikanti L, Buenaventura RM, Manchikanti KN, Ruan X, Gupta S, Smith HS, et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2012; 15:E199–245. PMID: 22622912.
4. McLain RF, Kapural L, Mekhail NA. Epidural steroid therapy for back and leg pain:mechanisms of action and efficacy. Spine J. 2005; 5:191–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.046. PMID: 15749619.
5. Kim LK, Kim JR, Shin SS, Kim IJ, Kim BN, Hwang GT. Analysis of influencing factors to depth of epidural space for lumbar transforaminal epidural block in korean. Korean J Pain. 2011; 24:216–20. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.4.216. PMID: 22220243. PMCID: PMC3248585.
6. Glaser SE, Falco F. Paraplegia following a thoracolumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Pain Physician. 2005; 8:309–14. PMID: 16850088.
7. Botwin KP, Baskin M, Rao S. Adverse effects of fluoroscopically guided interlaminar thoracic epidural steroid injections. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 85:14–23. DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000184475.44853.82. PMID: 16357544.
8. Windsor RE, Pinzon EG, Gore HC. Complications of common selective spinal injections:prevention and management. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000; 29:759–70. PMID: 11043958.
9. The Korean Pain Society. Textbook of Pain Medicine. 2012. 4th ed. Seoul: Shinwon Medical;p. 576–88.
10. Rados I, Sakic K, Fingler M, Kapural L. Efficacy of interlaminar vs transforaminal epidural steroid injection for the treatment of chronic unilateral radicular pain:prospective, randomized study. Pain Med. 2011; 12:1316–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01213.x. PMID: 21914118.
11. Byeon GJ, Choi EJ, Choi YM, Chang EJ, Kim HJ, Kim KH. Oblique interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection for management of low back pain with lumbosacral radicular pain - a case report. Anesth Pain Med. 2017; 12:375–80. DOI: 10.17085/apm.2017.12.4.375.
12. Boswell MV, Hansen HC, Trescot AM, Hirsch JA. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain and radiculopathy. Pain Physician. 2003; 6:319–34. PMID: 16880879.
13. Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Smith HS. Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2009; 12:233–51. PMID: 19165306.
14. Muro K, O'shaughnessy B, Ganju A. Infarction of the cervical spinal cord following multilevel transforaminal epidural steroid injection:case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007; 30:385–8. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753957. PMID: 17853663. PMCID: PMC2031936.
15. Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O'Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28:21–5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00007.
16. Glaser SE, Shah RV. Root cause analysis of paraplegia following transforaminal epidural steroid injections:the 'unsafe'triangle. Pain Physician. 2010; 13:237–44. PMID: 20495587.
17. Alleyne CH Jr, Cawley CM, Shengelaia GG, Barrow DL. Microsurgical anatomy of the artery of Adamkiewicz and its segmental artery. J Neurosurg. 1998; 89:791–5. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0791. PMID: 9817417.
18. Murthy NS, Maus TP, Behrns CL. Intraforaminal location of the great anterior radiculomedullary artery (artery of Adamkiewicz):a retrospective review. Pain Med. 2010; 11:1756–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00948.x. PMID: 21134118.
19. Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt Sinai J Med. 1991; 58:159–64. PMID: 1857361.
20. Carrillo EH, Schmacht DC, Gable DR, Spain DA, Richardson JD. Thoracoscopy in the management of posttraumatic persistent pneumothorax. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186:636–9. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00093-3.
21. Levy H, Kallenbach JM, Feldman C, Pincus P, Hurwitz M. Delayed pneumothorax after transbronchial lung biopsy. Thorax. 1986; 41:647–8. DOI: 10.1136/thx.41.8.647. PMID: 3787546. PMCID: PMC460412.
22. Aston SJ, Rosove M. Horner's syndrome occurring with spontaneous pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 1972; 287:1098. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197211232872117.
23. Rosas HG, Gilula LA. Performing thoracic transforaminal injections:a new technique. Radiology. 2010; 254:595–600. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09082085. PMID: 20093530.
24. el-Khoury GY, Whitten CG. Trauma to the upper thoracic spine:anatomy, biomechanics, and unique imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160:95–102. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.1.8416656. PMID: 8416656.
25. Hogan QH. Epidural anatomy examined by cryomicrotome section. Influence of age, vertebral level, and disease. Reg Anesth. 1996; 21:395–406. PMID: 8895998.
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr