Allergy Asthma Immunol Res.  2019 Mar;11(2):241-253. 10.4168/aair.2019.11.2.241.

Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in Korean Pediatric Patients: A Study From the Korea SCAR Registry

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dongins0@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Drug Safety Monitoring Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Institute of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
  • 8Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 9Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Although severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) are rare, they are associated with high morbidity and mortality, and thus early diagnosis and treatment are critical for improving prognoses. However, few studies have reported the characteristics of SCARs in children. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, current management and prognosis of pediatric SCARs.
METHODS
We analyzed pediatric data in the Korean SCARs registry, which was built retrospectively in 2016 with SCAR cases treated in 34 tertiary referral university hospitals during 2010-2015. Using these cases, we descriptively analyzed detailed data regarding etiology, clinical and laboratory features, treatment strategies, and prognosis.
RESULTS
Forty-seven pediatric SCAR cases from 15 tertiary referral hospitals were included. The median patient age was 10 (interquartile range, 3-15.5) years and 68.1% (n = 32) were males. The culprit drug was identified in 95.7% (n = 45) of the patients; antibiotics (44.7%) and antiepileptic drugs (19.1%) were the most common and second most common culprits, respectively. Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) cases presented with the largest area of skin involvement without permanent sequelae. Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) cases involved relatively small areas of skin but serious sequelae in two children. Of 4 patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), 1 died. Of all patients assessed, 36 (76.6%) received systemic steroids and 21 (44.7%) received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Thirteen (27.7%) received both systemic steroids and IVIG. Cyclosporine was administered to only 1 patient along with a systemic steroid.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with pediatric SCARs, including those with DRESS, SJS and TEN, clinical presentations were variable. Thus, there was no clear continuous disease spectrum. Although the mortality rate was low (2.1%), clinical suspicion may be the best tool for proactive SCAR management.

Keyword

Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; children; Drug eruptions

MeSH Terms

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anticonvulsants
Child
Cicatrix*
Cyclosporine
Drug Eruptions
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Early Diagnosis
Hospitals, University
Humans
Immunoglobulins
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous
Korea*
Male
Mortality
Prognosis
Referral and Consultation
Retrospective Studies
Skin
Steroids
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
Tertiary Care Centers
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anticonvulsants
Cyclosporine
Immunoglobulins
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous
Steroids

Figure

  • Figure Flow diagram of pediatric SCAR cases analyzed. SCAR, severe cutaneous adverse reaction.


Reference

1. Noguera-Morel L, Hernández-Martín Á, Torrelo A. Cutaneous drug reactions in the pediatric population. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014; 61:403–426.
Article
2. Gomes ER, Brockow K, Kuyucu S, Saretta F, Mori F, Blanca-Lopez N, et al. Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy. 2016; 71:149–161.
Article
3. Teo YX, Walsh SA. Severe adverse drug reactions. Clin Med (Lond). 2016; 16:79–83.
Article
4. Hoetzenecker W, Nägeli M, Mehra ET, Jensen AN, Saulite I, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, et al. Adverse cutaneous drug eruptions: current understanding. Semin Immunopathol. 2016; 38:75–86.
Article
5. Chantaphakul H, Sanon T, Klaewsongkram J. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Exp Ther Med. 2015; 10:519–524.
Article
6. Blumenthal KG, Wickner PG, Lau JJ, Zhou L. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a cross-sectional analysis of patients in an integrated allergy repository of a large health care system. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3:277–280.e1.
Article
7. Mockenhaupt M. International registry of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) to drugs and collection of biological sample, study protocol [Internet]. RegiSCAR study group;2010. cited 2018 Nov 5. Available from: http://www.regiscar.org/pdf/regiscarprotocol100312.pdf.
8. Jung HY, Park S, Shin B, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Lee MK, et al. Prevalence and clinical features of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome caused by antituberculosis drugs: a retrospective cohort study. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019.
Article
9. World Health Organization. Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardized case causality assessment [Internet]. Uppsala: The Uppsala Monitoring Centre;2005. cited 2018 Nov 5. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/WHOcausality_assessment.pdf.
10. Dibek Misirlioglu E, Guvenir H, Bahceci S, Haktanir Abul M, Can D, Usta Guc BE, et al. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions in pediatric patients: a multicenter study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017; 5:757–763.
Article
11. Kardaun SH, Sidoroff A, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Halevy S, Davidovici BB, Mockenhaupt M, et al. Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side-effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: does a DRESS syndrome really exist? Br J Dermatol. 2007; 156:609–611.
Article
12. Shiohara T, Iijima M, Ikezawa Z, Hashimoto K. The diagnosis of a DRESS syndrome has been sufficiently established on the basis of typical clinical features and viral reactivations. Br J Dermatol. 2007; 156:1083–1084.
Article
13. Park HW, Kim SH, Chang YS, Kim SH, Jee YK, Lee AY, et al. The fas signaling pathway is a common genetic risk factor for severe cutaneous drug adverse reactions across diverse drugs. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018; 10:555–561.
Article
14. Duong TA, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs. Lancet. 2017; 390:1996–2011.
Article
15. Fakoya AO, Omenyi P, Anthony P, Anthony F, Etti P, Otohinoyi DA, et al. Stevens - Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis; extensive review of reports of drug-induced etiologies, and possible therapeutic modalities. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6:730–738.
Article
16. Vernacchio L, Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Mitchell AA. Medication use among children <12 years of age in the United States: results from the Slone Survey. Pediatrics. 2009; 124:446–454.
17. Wolf R, Orion E, Marcos B, Matz H. Life-threatening acute adverse cutaneous drug reactions. Clin Dermatol. 2005; 23:171–181.
Article
18. Demoly P, Adkinson NF, Brockow K, Castells M, Chiriac AM, Greenberger PA, et al. International Consensus on drug allergy. Allergy. 2014; 69:420–437.
Article
19. Baeck M, Marot L, Nicolas JF, Pilette C, Tennstedt D, Goossens A. Allergic hypersensitivity to topical and systemic corticosteroids: a review. Allergy. 2009; 64:978–994.
Article
20. Freymond N, Catelain A, Queille E, Augey F, Nicolas JF. Allergic reaction to methylprednisolone. Rev Med Interne. 2003; 24:698–700.
21. Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Naldi L, Halevy S, Bouwes Bavinck JN, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol. 2008; 128:35–44.
Article
22. Wolf R, Matz H, Marcos B, Orion E. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms vs toxic epidermal necrolysis: the dilemma of classification. Clin Dermatol. 2005; 23:311–314.
Article
23. Khalili B, Bahna SL. Pathogenesis and recent therapeutic trends in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006; 97:272–280.
Article
24. Downey A, Jackson C, Harun N, Cooper A. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: review of pathogenesis and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 66:995–1003.
Article
25. Shiohara T, Kano Y. A complex interaction between drug allergy and viral infection. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007; 33:124–133.
Article
26. Kardaun SH, Sekula P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Liss Y, Chu CY, Creamer D, et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study. Br J Dermatol. 2013; 169:1071–1080.
Article
27. Belver MT, Michavila A, Bobolea I, Feito M, Bellón T, Quirce S. Severe delayed skin reactions related to drugs in the paediatric age group: a review of the subject by way of three cases (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and DRESS). Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2016; 44:83–95.
Article
28. Harr T, French LE. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2012; 97:149–166.
Article
29. Peter JG, Lehloenya R, Dlamini S, Risma K, White KD, Konvinse KC, et al. Severe delayed cutaneous and systemic reactions to drugs: a global perspective on the science and art of current practice. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017; 5:547–563.
Article
30. Mockenhaupt M. The current understanding of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011; 7:803–813.
Article
31. St John J, Ratushny V, Liu KJ, Bach DQ, Badri O, Gracey LE, et al. Successful use of cyclosporin A for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in three children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2017; 34:540–546.
Article
32. Kirchhof MG, Miliszewski MA, Sikora S, Papp A, Dutz JP. Retrospective review of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis treatment comparing intravenous immunoglobulin with cyclosporine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 71:941–947.
Article
33. Zhu QY, Ma L, Luo XQ, Huang HY. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: performance of SCORTEN and the score-based comparison of the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin combined therapy in China. J Burn Care Res. 2012; 33:e295–e308.
34. Lee HY, Dunant A, Sekula P, Mockenhaupt M, Wolkenstein P, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. The role of prior corticosteroid use on the clinical course of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case-control analysis of patients selected from the multinational EuroSCAR and RegiSCAR studies. Br J Dermatol. 2012; 167:555–562.
Article
35. Schneck J, Fagot JP, Sekula P, Sassolas B, Roujeau JC, Mockenhaupt M. Effects of treatments on the mortality of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a retrospective study on patients included in the prospective EuroSCAR Study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008; 58:33–40.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AAIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr