J Korean Acad Nurs.  2018 Dec;48(6):637-655. 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.6.637.

Concept Analysis of Tacit Nursing Knowledge

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nursing, Woosong College, Daejeon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. joohkim@kangwon.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this qualitative study is to investigate the nature of tacit nursing knowledge practiced in the clinical field in Korea using hybrid models, and to clarify the definitions and attributes of the concept.
METHODS
The definition and nature of tacit nursing knowledge, obtained through a review of the extensive literature at the theoretical stage of the research, and the analysis of the in-depth interview data conducted by the career nurses in the fieldwork stage, are compared and analyzed.
RESULTS
The tacit nursing knowledge was found in three dimensions as knowledge related to the person, the clinical situation work context, the self, the others, and the task. The tacit nursing knowledge was defined as personal nursing knowledge and artistic skills that show up as unconscious behavior patterns, learned informally, and internalizedthrough repeated clinical practice experience based on professional nursing knowledge.
CONCLUSION
Tacit nursing knowledge has been widely used in clinical practice and has been shown to have a great impact, directly or indirectly, on clinical nursing. Therefore, individual and organizational efforts are needed for validation and clarification using the generation, sharing, collection, and peer review of sound implicit nursing knowledge to ensure that it is properly applied.

Keyword

Analysis; Hybrid; Nursing

MeSH Terms

Humans
Korea
Nursing*
Peer Review

Figure

  • Figure 1. Procedure of literature identification and selection.


Cited by  1 articles

Factors Affecting Clinical Practicum Stress of Nursing Students: Using the Lazarus and Folkman's Stress-Coping Model
Sung Hae Kim, JuHee Lee, MiRa Jang
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019;49(4):437-448.    doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.4.437.


Reference

References

1. Washer P. Revisiting key skills: A practical framework for higher education. Quality in Higher Education. 2007; 13(1):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701272755.
Article
2. Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul;1966. p. 4–55.
3. Reber AS. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1989; 118(3):219–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219.
Article
4. Ha MS. Analysis of conveying effect of tacit knowledge applied peer review and collective intelligence in experimental class. Paper presented at: Kangwon University Wednesday Instruction Method Lounge. 2016. Apr 27; Chuncheon.
5. Herbig B, Büssing A, Ewert T. The role of tacit knowledge in the work context of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001; 34(5):687–695. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01798.x.
Article
6. Kothari A, Rudman D, Dobbins M, Rouse M, Sibbald S, Edwards N. The use of tacit and explicit knowledge in public health: A qualitative study. Implementation Science. 2012; 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-20.
Article
7. Choe IS, Yoon JY. Comparative study of implicit knowledge of creative person and perceived creative personality among Korea, China and Japan. The Journal of Creativity Education. 2013; 13(2):159–183.
8. Wagner RK, Sternberg RJ. Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985; 49(2):436–458.
Article
9. Ambrosini V, Bowman C. Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management Studies. 2001; 38(6):811–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00260.
Article
10. Mueller CE, Bradley KD. Utilizing the rasch model to develop and evaluate items for the tacit knowledge inventory for superintendents (TKIS). International Journal of Knowledge Management. 2009; 5(3):73–93. https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2009070105.
Article
11. Benner P. From novice to expert. The American Journal of Nursing. 1982; 82(3):402–407.
Article
12. Carper B. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science. 1978; 1(1):13–23.
Article
13. Fox C. A confirmatory factor analysis of the structure of tacit knowledge in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 1997; 36(10):459–466.
Article
14. Yi M, Lee SW, Kim KJ, Kim MG, Kim JH, Lee KH, et al. A review study on the strategies for concept analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006; 36(3):493–502. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.3.493.
Article
15. Schwartz-Barcott D, Kim HS. An expansion and elaboration of the hybrid model of concept development. Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelpia (PA): Saunders;2000. p. 129–159.
16. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research. 1999; 34(5Pt2):1189–1208.
17. Sandelowski M. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science. 1986; 8(3):27–37.
Article
18. National Institute of Korean Language. Standard Korean Language Dictionary [Internet]. Seoul: National Institute of Korean Language;c2017. [cited 2017 Jun 1]. Available from:. http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/search/List_dic.jsp.
19. Oxford University Press. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press;1933. p. 1446.
20. Wikipedia. A Korean Wiki dictionary [Internet]. St. Petersburg (FL): Wikipedia;c2017. [cited 2017 Sep 3]. Available from:. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%95%94%EB%AC%B5%EC%A7%80.
21. Reber AS. An evolutionary context for the cognitive unconscious. Philosophical Psychology. 1992; 5(1):33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951508920857304222.
Article
22. Brummell SP, Seymour J, Higginbottom G. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in the emergency department: An ethnography of tacit knowledge in practice. Social Science & Medicine. 2016; 156:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.socscimed.2016.03.022.
Article
23. Eriksen KÅ, Dahl H, Karlsson B, Arman M. Strengthening practical wisdom: Mental health workers’ learning and development. Nursing Ethics. 2014; 21(6):707–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733013518446.
24. Carus U, Nogala D, Schulze H. Experience-guided working: An undervalued resource for advanced manufacturing systems. Bröedner P, Karwowski W, editors. Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems Ⅲ. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing and Hybrid Automation. 1992 Aug 26-28; Gelsenkirchen, Germany. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsvier;c1992. p. 423–428.
25. Leonard N, Insch G. Tacit knowledge in academia: A proposed model and measurement scale. The Journal of Psychology. 2005; 139(6):495–512.
Article
26. Nonaka I, Konno N. The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review. 1998; 40(3):40–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165942.
Article
27. Dienes Z, Berry D. Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1997; 4(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210769.
Article
28. Henry SG. Polanyi’s tacit knowing and the relevance of epistemology to clinical medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2010; 16(2):292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01387.x.
Article
29. Van Der Zande M, Baart A, Vosman F. Ethical sensitivity in practice: Finding tacit moral knowing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2014; 70(1):68–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12154.
Article
30. Carlsson G, Dahlberg K, Drew N. Encountering violence and aggression in mental health nursing: A phenomenological study of tacit caring knowledge. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2000; 21(5):533–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840050044276.
Article
31. Greenhalgh J, Flynn R, Long AF, Tyson S. Tacit and encoded knowledge in the use of standardised outcome measures in multidisciplinary team decision making: A case study of in-patient neurorehabilitation. Social Science & Medicine. 2008; 67(1):183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.006.
Article
32. Gelman R. Constructivism and supporting environments. Tirosh D, editor. Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: An Educational Approach (Human Development, Vol. 6). Norwood (NJ): Ablex;1994. p. 55–82.
33. Welsh I, Lyons CM. Evidence-based care and the case for intuition and tacit knowledge in clinical assessment and decision making in mental health nursing practice: An empirical contribution to the debate. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2001; 8(4):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2001.00386.x.
Article
34. Armstrong SJ, Mahmud A. Experiential learning and the acquisition of managerial tacit knowledge. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2008; 7(2):189–208. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.32712617.
Article
35. Sternberg RJ, Forsythe GB, Hedlund J, Horvath JA, Wagner RK, Williams WM, et al. Practical intelligence in everyday life. 1st Kor. Ed.Jung, MJ, Translator. Seoul: Buguelbooks;c2008. p. 20–45. 87,167-178,244.
36. Benner P, Tanner C. Clinical judgement: How expert nurse use intuition. The American Journal of Nursing. 1987; 87(1):23–31.
37. Daley BJ. Learning in clinical nursing practice. Holistic Nursing Practice. 2001; 16(1):43–54.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr