Korean J Adult Nurs.  2018 Dec;30(6):656-668. 10.7475/kjan.2018.30.6.656.

Journey through the Fight against Ovarian Cancer: Finding the Existence Value with being Tied to the Bridle of Death

• Park YS
• Park JS

• KMID: 2429772
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2018.30.6.656

Abstract

PURPOSE
The specific aims were to identify the process of fight against ovarian cancer and how the women interact with other people.
METHODS
The subjects included 12 women who were higher than stage II epithelial ovarian cancer. Data were collected with an in-depth individual interview from July 2017 to April 2018. The specific analysis process followed the grounded theory method of Corbin and Strauss.
RESULTS
The results show that the core category was "finding the existence value with being tied to the bridle of death". The outcomes were "fighting cancer in loneliness", "life compromised with death", and "social sublimation". The women with ovarian cancer experienced the collapse of existence value while they reached the phase of implicit maintenance through the phases of chaos, active seeking, and desperate coping by using various strategies.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study indicate psychosocial problems due to the collapse of women's existence value in the process of ovarian cancer treatment, which have an important effect on the entire treatment process. Thus, it is important to develop nursing strategies based on the characteristics of the process of treatment in ovarian cancer and health providers should support them to rebuild the value of the existence through it.

MeSH Terms

Female
Grounded Theory
Humans
Life Change Events
Methods
Nursing
Ovarian Neoplasms*
Qualitative Research

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 The journey through the fight against ovarian cancer.

Reference

1. Korea Center Cancer Registry. Cancer in statistics [Internet]. Goyang City, Gyeonggi: Korea Center Cancer Registry;2017. cited 2018 Jan 29. Available from: https://kccrsurvey.cancer.go.kr:10443/index.do.

2. National Cancer Information Center. National Cancer Statistics [Internet]. Goyang City, Gyeonggi: National Cancer Information Center;2017. cited 2018 May 20. Available from: https://www.cancer.go.kr/lay1/S1T645C647/contents.do.

3. Jelovac D, Armstrong DK. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011; 61(3):183–203. DOI: 10.3322/caac.20113.

4. Park YS, Park JS. Awareness and health belief of ovarian cancer among women in an urban area. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health. 2016; 20(3):239–252. DOI: 10.21896/jksmch.2016.20.3.239.

5. Goldstein CL, Susman EP, Lockwood S, Medlin EE, Behbakht K. Awareness of symptoms and risk factors of ovarian cancer in a population of women and healthcare providers. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2015; 19(2):206–212. DOI: 10.1188/15.CJON.206-212.

6. Giornelli GH. Management of relapsed ovarian cancer: a review. SpringerPlus. 2016; 5(1):1197–1207. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2660-0.

7. Hwang KH, Cho O-H, Yoo Y-S. Symptom clusters of ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, and their emotional status and quality of life. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2016; 21:215–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.10.007.

8. Park EH, Kim H. Nutritional status and fatigue in women cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2015; 22(4):387–397. DOI: 10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.4.387.

9. Yun YH, Park SY, Oh JH, Kim YW, Seo SS, Chae HS, et al. Development of the infrastructure of cancer care outcomes research. Institutional Research Project Final Report. Goyang City, Gyeonggi: National Cancer Center;2009. 12. Report No.: 0710730-3.

10. Lutgendorf SK, De Geest K, Bender D, Ahmed A, Goodheart MJ, Dahmoush L, et al. Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012; 30(23):2885–2890. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4411.

11. Park JS, Oh JY. Factors influencing on quality of life in gynecological cancer patients. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2012; 24(1):52–63.

12. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines for treatment of cancer. [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network;2018. cited 2018 January 14. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx.

13. Yang JH. The actual experiences of the living world among cancer patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008; 38(1):140–151. DOI: 10.3030/jkan.2008.38.1.140.

14. DellaRipa J. Distress in Women with Ovarian Cancer [dissertation]. Virginia: Virginia Commonwealth University;2014.

15. Ekwall E, Ternestedt B-M, Sorbe B, Sunvisson H. Lived experiences of women with recurring ovarian cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2014; 18(1):104–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.08.002.

16. Ozga M, Aghajanian C, Myers-Virtue S, McDonnell G, Jhanwar S, Hichenberg S, et al. A systematic review of ovarian cancer and fear of recurrence. Palliative & Supportive Care. 2015; 13(6):1771–1780. DOI: 10.1017/S1478951515000127.

17. Power J, Brown L, Ritvo P. A qualitative study examining psychosocial distress, coping, and social support across the stages and phases of epithelial ovarian cancer. Health Care for Women International. 2008; 29(4):366–383. DOI: 10.1080/07399330701876521.

18. Ferrell BR, Smith SL, Ervin KS, Itano J, Melancon C. A qualitative analysis of social concerns of women with ovarian cancer. Psychooncology. 2003; 12(7):647–663. DOI: 10.1002/pon.681.

19. Song DY. Women, health, and wellbeing. Korea Womens Stud Inst. 2001; 1(1):149–180.

20. Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications;2008.

21. Lee D, Kim Y. An inquiry on the philosophical backgrounds and methodological characteristics of grounded theory as qualitative research method. J Yeolin Educ. 2012; 20(2):1–26.

22. Burke PJ, Reitzes DC. An identity theory approach to commitment. Soc Psychol Q. 1991; 54(3):239–251. DOI: 10.2307/2786653.

23. Jeong BR. Women and cancer. Journal of Korean Women's Studies. 1992; 8(6):135–164.

24. Yeon HS. The female experience of conflict in modern Korea and the aesthetic. Korean Feminist Philosophy. 2001; 1(1):135–158.

25. Lee SM, Kim S, Lee HS. The Process of Medical Decision-making for Cancer Patients. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009; 12(1):1–14.

26. Kim S, Son H. Appearance management experiences of breast cancer patients: a grounded theory approach. J Korean Soc Clothing Text. 2017; 41(3):556–574. DOI: 10.5850/JKSCT.2017.41.3.556.

27. Sung MH. The loss experience in women with hysterectomy. The Journal of Nurses Academic Society. 1997; 27(1):128–140. DOI: 10.4040/jnas.1997.27.1.128.

28. Lee Y-S. Psychosocial experience in post-mastectomy women. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2007; 59(3):99–124. DOI: 10.20970/kasw.2007.59.3.005.

29. Stead ML, Fallowfield L, Brown JM, Selby P. Communication about sexual problems and sexual concerns in ovarian cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2001; 323:836–837. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7317.836.

30. Lim I-S. Breast cancer, damaged body and sense of femininity crisis. Journal of Korean Women's Studies. 2006; 22(4):5–46.

31. Kim YJ. Life Experience of inpatients with recurrent breast cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2011; 41(2):214–224. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.2.214.

32. Heo SM, Heo N. Experiences of self-management support among breast cancer survivors. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2016; 28(4):470–481. DOI: 10.7475/kjan.2016.28.4.470.

33. Yi M, Ryu YM, Hwang E. The experience of self-help group activities among women with breast cancer in Korea. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2014; 26(4):466–478. DOI: 10.7475/kjan.2014.26.4.466.

34. Von Gruenigen VE, Daly BJ. Futility: clinical decisions at the end-of-life in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2005; 97(2):638–644. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.031.

35. Jeon MH. Understanding the process of breast cancer patients [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University;1994.