Ann Surg Treat Res.  2019 Jan;96(1):14-18. 10.4174/astr.2019.96.1.14.

Impact of technical innovation on surgical outcome of laparoscopic major liver resection: 10 years' experience at a large-volume center

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Hallym University Medical Center, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chdkwon@gmail.com
  • 3Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • 4Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Laparoscopic major liver resection (major LLR) remains a challenging procedure because of the technical difficulty. Several significant technical innovations have been applied in our center since 2012. They include routine application of bipolar electrocautery, initiation of temporary increase of intra-abdominal pressure during bleeding events from veins to balance the central venous pressure, and use of temporary inflow control of the Glissonean pedicle. This study evaluated the impact of these technique modifications in patients with major LLR.
METHODS
Between January 2004 and February 2015, a total of 606 patients underwent LLR at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Major LLR was employed in 233 cases. All major LLR procedures were anatomical resections performed with a totally laparoscopic approach. We compared surgical parameters of right hepatectomy (RH), left hepatectomy (LH), and right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) before and after 2012.
RESULTS
Open conversion rates of RH and LH and estimated blood loss in RPS significantly decreased after 2012. The postoperative complication rate of major LLR was 12.7% and was similar before and after 2012. Bile leakage was the most common complication (3.2%).
CONCLUSION
The modifications of surgical techniques resulted in good outcomes for laparoscopic major LLR. We recommend routine application of these techniques to improve outcomes, especially in patients requiring major liver resection.

Keyword

Laparoscopy; Hepatectomy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Learning curve

MeSH Terms

Bile
Central Venous Pressure
Electrocoagulation
Hemorrhage
Hepatectomy
Humans
Korea
Laparoscopy
Learning Curve
Liver*
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Postoperative Complications
Seoul
Veins

Cited by  1 articles

Realization of improved outcomes following liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients aged 75 years and older
Jong Man Kim, Jinsoo Rhu, Sang Yun Ha, Gyu-Seong Choi, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Gaabsoo Kim, Jae-Won Joh
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021;101(5):257-265.    doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.5.257.


Reference

1. O'Rourke N, Fielding G. Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8:213–216.
2. Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H, Denet C, Shahri NK, Gayet B. Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg. 2006; 93:67–72.
Article
3. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:825–830.
4. Lee GC, Kwon CH, Joh JW, Heo JS, Jung GO, Moon JI, et al. Preliminary experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2011; 15:7–12.
5. Lee N, Cho CW, Kim JM, Choi GS, Kwon CH, Joh JW. Application of temporary inflow control of the Glissonean pedicle method provides a safe and easy technique for totally laparoscopic hemihepatectomy by Glissonean approach. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017; 92:383–386.
Article
6. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014; 21:745–753.
Article
7. Cho CW, Rhu J, Kwon CHD, Choi GS, Kim JM, Joh JW, et al. Short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic central hepatectomy and right anterior sectionectomy for centrally located tumors: a case-matched study with propensity score matching. World J Surg. 2017; 41:2838–2846.
Article
8. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015; 261:619–629.
9. Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, Tranchart H, Fuks D, Soubrane O, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014; 21:732–736.
Article
10. Dagher I, O'Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:856–860.
11. Hwang DW, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, Kwon Y, Kim JH, et al. Laparoscopic major liver resection in Korea: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 20:125–130.
12. Aldrighetti L, Guzzetti E, Pulitanò C, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, et al. Case-matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results. J Surg Oncol. 2010; 102:82–86.
Article
13. Nomi T, Fuks D, Govindasamy M, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015; 102:254–260.
Article
14. Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015; 102:796–804.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr