Ann Rehabil Med.  2018 Oct;42(5):737-747. 10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.737.

Parents' Perspectives and Clinical Effectiveness of Cranial-Molding Orthoses in Infants With Plagiocephaly

• Lee HS
• Kim SJ
• Kwon JY

• KMID: 2429203
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.737

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To investigate the clinical effectiveness of and parents' perspectives on cranial-molding orthotic treatment.
METHODS
Medical charts were reviewed for 82 infants treated for plagiocephaly with cranial-molding orthoses in our clinic from April 2012 to July 2016 retrospectively. Infants who were clinically diagnosed with positional plagiocephaly and had a Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) of more than 3.5% were included. Pre- and post-treatment CVAI was obtained by three-dimensional head-surface laser scan. Parents' perceptions of good outcome (satisfaction) were evaluated with the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The GAS score assessed how much the parent felt that his or her initial goal for correcting the skull asymmetry was achieved after the treatment.
RESULTS
The compliance with cranial-molding orthoses was 90.2% (74 of 82 infants). There were 53 infants (65% of the 82 infants) who had adverse events with the cranial-molding orthoses during the study. Heat rash was found in 29 cases (35.4%) and was the most common adverse event. The mean GAS T-score was 51.9±10.2. A GAS T-score of 0 or more was identified for 71.6% of parents. The GAS T-score was significantly related to the age (p < 0.001), the initial CVAI, and the difference of CVAI during the treatment (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Parents' perception of good outcome was correlated with the anthropometric improvement in cranialmolding orthotic treatment in infants with plagiocephaly. A high percentage of parents felt that the treatment met their initial goals in spite of a high occurrence of adverse events.

Keyword

Orthotic devices; Plagiocephaly; Treatment outcome; Cephalymetry

MeSH Terms

Compliance
Exanthema
Hot Temperature
Humans
Infant*
Orthotic Devices*
Parents
Plagiocephaly*
Plagiocephaly, Nonsynostotic
Retrospective Studies
Skull
Treatment Outcome*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. (A) A cross-sectional plane through the sellion (SE) and both tragia (T) was set as the reference plane and designated the level 0 plane. The plane parallel to the level 0 plane that passed through the vertex of the head was designated as the level 10 plane. The portion of the cranium superior to the reference/level 0 plane was divided into 9 equally spaced cross-sectional planes, each parallel to the reference plane. (B) Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (%) = long cranial diagonal (mm)-short cranial diagonal (mm)short cranial diagonal (mm)×100

• 

  Fig. 2. Age, duration of therapy, and hours of putting on cranial-molding orthoses versus GAS T-score. The GAS T-score was significantly related to the age. GAS, Goal Attainment Scale.

• 

  Fig. 3. Initial CVAI (left), terminal CVAI (center), difference of CVAI (right) from initiation and to termination versus GAS T-score. The initial CVAI and the difference of CVAI from the initiation to the termination of the treatment at level 3 and level 5 were significantly related to the GAS T-score. CVAI, Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index; GAS, Goal Attainment Scale.

• 

  Fig. 4. Age, duration of therapy, hours of putting on cranial-molding orthoses per day and initial Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) versus difference of CVAI from initiation and to termination (level 3). The difference of CVAI at level 3 and level 5 from the initiation to the termination of the treatment were significantly related to the age and the initial CVAI.

Reference

1. Ellenbogen RG, Gruss JS, Cunningham ML. Update on craniofacial surgery: the differential diagnosis of lambdoid synostosis/posterior plagiocephaly. Clin Neurosurg. 2000; 47:303–18.

2. Mortenson P, Steinbok P, Smith D. Deformational plagiocephaly and orthotic treatment: indications and limitations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012; 28:1407–12.

3. Looman WS, Flannery AB. Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly, Part I: assessment and diagnosis. J Pediatr Health Care. 2012; 26:242–50.

4. Hutchison BL, Hutchison LA, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA. Plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in the first two years of life: a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics. 2004; 114:970–80.

5. Collett B, Breiger D, King D, Cunningham M, Speltz M. Neurodevelopmental implications of “deformational” plagiocephaly. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005; 26:379–89.

6. Boere-Boonekamp MM, van der Linden-Kuiper LT. Positional preference: prevalence in infants and follow-up after two years. Pediatrics. 2001; 107:339–43.

7. Robinson S, Proctor M. Diagnosis and management of deformational plagiocephaly. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009; 3:284–95.

8. Tamber MS, Nikas D, Beier A, Baird LC, Bauer DF, Durham S, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guideline on the role of cranial molding orthosis (Helmet) therapy for patients with positional plagiocephaly. Neurosurgery. 2016; 79:E632–E633.

9. van Wijk RM, van Vlimmeren LA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Van der Ploeg CP, Ijzerman MJ, Boere-Boonekamp MM. Helmet therapy in infants with positional skull deformation: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014; 348:g2741.

10. Mulliken JB, Vander Woude DL, Hansen M, LaBrie RA, Scott RM. Analysis of posterior plagiocephaly: deformational versus synostotic. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103:371–80.

11. Stadnick NA, Drahota A, Brookman-Frazee L. Parent perspectives of an evidence-based intervention for children with autism served in community mental health clinics. J Child Fam Stud. 2013; 22:414–22.

12. Elwood ET, Petronio J, Wood RJ. Parental satisfaction with the CranioCap: a new cranial orthosis for deformational plagiocephaly. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42:340–3.

13. Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Sbitany H, Girotto JA. Treatment of plagiocephaly with helmet molding therapy: do actual results mimic perception? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48:205–9.

14. Loveday BP, de Chalain TB. Active counterpositioning or orthotic device to treat positional plagiocephaly? J Craniofac Surg. 2001; 12:308–13.

15. Mortenson PA, Steinbok P. Quantifying positional plagiocephaly: reliability and validity of anthropometric measurements. J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17:413–9.

16. Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:362–70.

17. Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment Health J. 1968; 4:443–53.

18. Rockwood K, Joyce B, Stolee P. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50:581–8.

19. Wilbrand JF, Wilbrand M, Malik CY, Howaldt HP, Streckbein P, Schaaf H, et al. Complications in helmet therapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40:341–6.

20. Freudlsperger C, Bodem JP, Kargus S, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Hoffman J, Engel M. The incidence of complications associated with molding helmet therapy: an avoidable risk in the treatment of positional head deformities? J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26:e299–302.

21. de Ribaupierre S, Vernet O, Rilliet B, Cavin B, Kalina D, Leyvraz P. Posterior positional plagiocephaly treated with cranial remodeling orthosis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007; 137:368–72.

22. Vles JS, Colla C, Weber JW, Beuls E, Wilmink J, Kingma H. Helmet versus nonhelmet treatment in nonsynostotic positional posterior plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg. 2000; 11:572–4.

23. Kluba S, Kraut W, Calgeer B, Reinert S, Krimmel M. Treatment of positional plagiocephaly: helmet or no helmet? J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42:683–8.

24. Freudlsperger C, Steinmacher S, Saure D, Bodem JP, Kuhle R, Hoffmann J, et al. Impact of severity and therapy onset on helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44:110–5.

25. Graham JM Jr, Gomez M, Halberg A, Earl DL, Kreutzman JT, Cui J, et al. Management of deformational plagiocephaly: repositioning versus orthotic therapy. J Pediatr. 2005; 146:258–62.

26. Seruya M, Oh AK, Taylor JH, Sauerhammer TM, Rogers GF. Helmet treatment of deformational plagiocephaly: the relationship between age at initiation and rate of correction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131:55e–61e.

27. Bailey DB Jr, Buysse V, Edmondson R, Smith TM. Creating family-centered services in early intervention: perceptions of professionals in four states. Except Child. 1992; 58:298–309.

28. King G, King S, Rosenbaum P. Interpersonal aspects of care-giving and client outcomes: a review of the literature. Ambul Child Health. 1996; 2:151–60.