Ann Rehabil Med.  2018 Oct;42(5):702-712. 10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.702.

Psychometric Properties of Three Fatigue Rating Scales in Individuals With Late Effects of Polio

• Lexell J
• Jonasson S
• Brogardh C

• KMID: 2429199
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.702

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) in persons with late effects of polio (LEoP). More specifically, we explored the data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, reliability, and convergent validity.
METHODS
A postal survey including FSS, FIS, and MFI-20 was administered to 77 persons with LEoP. Responders received a second survey after 3 weeks to enable test-retest reliability analyses.
RESULTS
Sixty-one persons (mean age, 68 years; 54% women) responded to the survey (response rate 79%). Data quality of the rating scales was high (with 0%-0.5% missing item responses), the corrected item-total correlations exceeded 0.4 and the scales showed very little floor or ceiling effects (0%-6.6%). All scales had an acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α≥0.95) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.80). The standard error of measurement and the smallest detectable difference were 7%-10% and 20%-28% of the possible scoring range. All three scales were highly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient r(s)=0.79-0.80; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The FSS, FIS, and MFI-20 exhibit sound psychometric properties in terms of data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, reliability, and convergent validity, suggesting that these three rating scales can be used to assess fatigue in persons with LEoP. As FSS has fewer items and therefore is less time consuming it may be the preferred scale. However, the choice of scale depends on the research question and the study design.

Keyword

Fatigue; Postpoliomyelitis syndrome; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Reliability of results

MeSH Terms

Data Accuracy
Fatigue*
Humans
Poliomyelitis*
Postpoliomyelitis Syndrome
Psychometrics*
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Weights and Measures*

Reference

1. Lexell J. Postpoliomyelitis syndrome. In : Frontera WR, Silver JK, Rizzo TD, editors. Essentials of physical medicine and rehabilitation: musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;2015. p. 775–81.

2. Schanke AK, Stanghelle JK. Fatigue in polio survivors. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39:243–51.

3. Jensen MP, Alschuler KN, Smith AE, Verrall AM, Goetz MC, Molton IR. Pain and fatigue in persons with postpolio syndrome: independent effects on functioning. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92:1796–801.

4. Brogardh C, Lexell J. How various self-reported impairments influence walking ability in persons with late effects of polio. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015; 37:291–8.

5. Lexell J, Brogardh C. Life satisfaction and self-reported impairments in persons with late effects of polio. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 55:577–89.

6. McNalley TE, Yorkston KM, Jensen MP, Truitt AR, Schomer KG, Baylor C, et al. Review of secondary health conditions in postpolio syndrome: prevalence and effects of aging. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 94:139–45.

7. Tersteeg IM, Koopman FS, Stolwijk-Swuste JM, Beelen A, Nollet F; CARPA Study Group. A 5-year longitudinal study of fatigue in patients with late-onset sequelae of poliomyelitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92:899–904.

8. Kalkman JS, Zwarts MJ, Schillings ML, van Engelen BG, Bleijenberg G. Different types of fatigue in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy and HMSN-I: experienced fatigue and physiological fatigue. Neurol Sci. 2008; 29 Suppl 2:S238–40.

9. On AY, Oncu J, Atamaz F, Durmaz B. Impact of postpolio-related fatigue on quality of life. J Rehabil Med. 2006; 38:329–32.

10. Yang EJ, Lee SY, Kim K, Jung SH, Jang SN, Han SJ, et al. Factors associated with reduced quality of life in polio survivors in Korea. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0130448.

11. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1989; 46:1121–3.

12. Fisk JD, Pontefract A, Ritvo PG, Archibald CJ, Murray TJ. The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1994; 21:9–14.

13. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995; 39:315–25.

14. Oncu J, Atamaz F, Durmaz B, On A. Psychometric properties of fatigue severity and fatigue impact scales in postpolio patients. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013; 36:339–45.

15. Vasconcelos OM Jr, Prokhorenko OA, Kelley KF, Vo AH, Olsen CH, Dalakas MC, et al. A comparison of fatigue scales in postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87:1213–7.

16. Horemans HL, Nollet F, Beelen A, Lankhorst GJ. A comparison of 4 questionnaires to measure fatigue in postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85:392–8.

17. Koopman FS, Brehm MA, Heerkens YF, Nollet F, Beelen A. Measuring fatigue in polio survivors: content comparison and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale and the Checklist Individual Strength. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46:761–7.

18. Burger H, Franchignoni F, Puzic N, Giordano A. Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale in polio survivors. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010; 33:290–7.

19. Dencker A, Sunnerhagen KS, Taft C, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Multidimensional fatigue inventory and postpolio syndrome: a Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13:20.

20. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, Thompson AJ. What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol. 2012; 259:2681–94.

21. Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84:719–23.

22. Brogardh C, Lexell J, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Construct validity of a new rating scale for self-reported impairments in persons with late effects of polio. PM R. 2013; 5:176–81.

23. Mattsson M, Moller B, Lundberg IE, Gard G, Bostrom C. Reliability and validity of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008; 37:269–77.

24. Flensner G, Lindencrona C. The cooling-suit: case studies of its influence on fatigue among eight individuals with multiple sclerosis. J Adv Nurs. 2002; 37:541–50.

25. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JC. Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 1996; 73:241–5.

26. Furst CJ, Ahsberg E. Dimensions of fatigue during radiotherapy: an application of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Support Care Cancer. 2001; 9:355–60.

27. Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009; 13:1–177.

28. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51:945–52.

29. Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: development of a patient-based measure of outcome. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8:1–48.

30. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16:297–334.

31. Schuck P. Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used? Qual Life Res. 2004; 13:571–86.

32. Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, Lohr KN, Patrick DL, Perrin E, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11:193–205.

33. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2015.

34. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60:34–42.

35. Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin;2003.

36. Fisk JD. Scaling and scoring of the Fatigue Impact Scale version 2.0 (FIS). Lyon, France: MAPI Research Trust;2009.

37. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003; 80:99–103.

38. Tyson SF, Brown P. How to measure fatigue in neurological conditions? A systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures used so far. Clin Rehabil. 2014; 28:804–16.