Arch Plast Surg.
2018 Nov;45(6):495-503. 10.5999/aps.2017.01592.
Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options
- Affiliations
-
- 1Academic Plastic Surgery, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK. a.ghanem@qmul.ac.uk
- 2Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
- 3Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns Unit, Nicosia General Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus.
- KMID: 2427538
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01592
Abstract
- With significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous flaps; the free fibula flap, the scapula flap, the iliac crest flap and the radial forearm flap. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles relevant to donor site morbidity for these flaps. We assessed morbidity in terms of incidence of delayed healing, chronic pain, aesthetic outcomes, site specific complications and patient satisfaction/quality of life. Weighted means were calculated when sufficient studies were available for review. The radial forearm and free fibula flaps are associated with high rates of delayed healing of approximately 20% compared to the scapular ( < 10%) and iliac flaps (5%). The radial forearm flap has higher rates of chronic pain (16.7%) and dissatisfaction with scar appearance (33%). For the majority of these patients harvest of one of these four osteocutaneous does not limit daily function at long-term follow-up. The scapular osteocutaneous flap is associated with the lowest relative morbidity and should be strongly considered when the recipient defect allows. The radial forearm is associated with higher morbidity in terms of scarring, fractures, chronic pain and wrist function and should not be considered as first choice when other flap options are available.
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- Various Utility of Perforator Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction
- The Clinical Study on the Most Common Donor Sites in Head and Neck Reconstruction using Free Flaps
- Contribution of Perforator Flaps in the Flap Selection for Head and Neck Reconstruction
- Anterolateral thigh free flaps and radial forearm free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: A 20-year analysis from a single institution
- Reconstruction of the defects with free flaps after head and neck cancer ablation
