Korean J Radiol.  2017 Jun;18(3):536-542. 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.536.

Value of the Post-Operative CT in Predicting Delayed Flap Failures Following Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 05355, Korea. evee0914@chollian.net
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ilsong Memorial Institute of Head and Neck Cancer, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 05355, Korea.
  • 3Department of Plastic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 05355, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To identify post-operative computed tomography (CT) findings associated with delayed flap failures following head and neck cancer surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients who underwent flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery and post-operative (3-14 days) contrast-enhanced CT scans for suspected complications. Patients were divided into two groups: delayed flap failure patients (patients required flap revision) (n = 18) and flap success patients (n = 42). Clinical data (age, sex, T-stage, type of flap, and time interval between reconstruction surgery and CT) and post-operative CT findings of flap status (maximum dimension of the flap, intra- or peri-flap fluid collection and intra- or peri-flap air collection, fat infiltration within the flap, fistula to adjacent aerodigestive tract or skin, and enhanced vascular pedicle) were assessed and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
CT findings showed that the following flap anomalies were observed more frequently in the delayed flap failure group than in the flap success group: intra- or peri-flap fluid collection > 4 cm (61.1% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.05), intra- or peri-flap air collection > 2 cm (61.1% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and fistula to adjacent aerodigestive tract or skin (44.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). The maximum dimension of the flap, fat infiltration within the flap, and enhanced vascular pedicle were not associated with delayed flap failures.
CONCLUSION
A large amount of fluid or air collection and fistula are the CT findings that were associated with delayed flap failures in patients with suspected post-operative complications after head and neck cancer surgery.

Keyword

Head and neck cancer; Post-operative CT; Flap reconstruction; Surgical flaps; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Flap failure; Post-operative period

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Female
Head and Neck Neoplasms/*diagnostic imaging/pathology/surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications/etiology
Predictive Value of Tests
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Flaps/adverse effects
*Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Failure

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flowchart showing process of showing inclusion of patients in study.

  • Fig. 2 59-year-old man with flap failure.Patient underwent reconstruction by radial forearm flap after resection of oropharyngeal cancer, and second flap surgery after 15 post-operative days due to flap failure.A. Contrast-enhanced CT scan 9 days after operation shows fat-containing flap (arrow) in retropharyngeal space and peri-flap fluid collection (long arrow) in left parapharyngeal space. Fistula from oropharyngeal wall to left submandibular space (arrowheads) is noted. B. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at more caudal level than (A) shows fat-containing flap (arrow) and large peri-flap fluid collection with air collection (long arrow) in left submandibular space. Note enhanced vascular pedicles (arrowheads) of flap.

  • Fig. 3 35-year-old woman with flap failure.Patient underwent reconstruction by anterolateral thigh flap after resection of tongue cancer, and flap revision surgery after 20 post-operative days due to flap failure.A. Contrast-enhanced CT scan 6 days after operation shows fat-containing flap (arrows) with intra-flap fluid collection (long arrow) in left submandibular space and air collection (arrowhead) in left submandibular space. B. Contrast-enhanced CT scan obtained at more caudal level than (A) shows fat-containing flap (arrows) with fat infiltration. Cutaneous fistula (arrowhead) is also noted in left submandibular area.

  • Fig. 4 55-year-old man with flap success.Patient underwent reconstruction by radial forearm flap after resection of laryngeal cancer. Contrast-enhanced CT scan 7 days after operation shows fat-containing flap (arrows) and small peri-flap fluid collection (long arrow) with small air bubble in right submandibular space. Note enhanced vascular pedicles (black and white arrowheads) of flap.


Cited by  1 articles

Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals
Ji Hun Kang, Dong Hwan Kim, Seong Ho Park, Jung Hwan Baek
Korean J Radiol. 2018;19(6):1172-1178.    doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1172.


Reference

1. le Nobel GJ, Higgins KM, Enepekides DJ. Predictors of complications of free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery: analysis of 304 free flap reconstruction procedures. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122:1014–1019. PMID: 22407907.
Article
2. Shum J, Markiewicz MR, Park E, Bui T, Lubek J, Bell RB, et al. Low prealbumin level is a risk factor for microvascular free flap failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72:169–177. PMID: 23911143.
Article
3. Kim BD, Ver Halen JP, Grant DW, Kim JY. Anesthesia duration as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in free flap surgery: a review of 1,305 surgical cases. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014; 30:217–226. PMID: 24163224.
Article
4. Song H, Kim JH, Park MC, Park DH, Lee K, Lee IJ. Usefulness of serum C-reactive protein level for predicting flap complication after performing free microvascular head and neck reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25:1348–1351. PMID: 24892417.
Article
5. Bourget A, Chang JT, Wu DB, Chang CJ, Wei FC. Free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region following radiotherapy: a cohort study identifying negative outcome predictors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:1901–1908. PMID: 21228745.
Article
6. Singh B, Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E, Shaha AR, Pfister DG, Shah JP. Factors associated with complications in microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103:403–411. PMID: 9950525.
Article
7. Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR, Landis JR, Yeramian P, Ingram D, et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102:711–721. PMID: 9727436.
Article
8. Bozikov K, Arnez ZM. Factors predicting free flap complications in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59:737–742. PMID: 16782570.
Article
9. Mücke T, Rau A, Weitz J, Ljubic A, Rohleder N, Wolff KD, et al. Influence of irradiation and oncologic surgery on head and neck microsurgical reconstructions. Oral Oncol. 2012; 48:367–371. PMID: 22155256.
Article
10. Genden EM, Rinaldo A, Suárez C, Wei WI, Bradley PJ, Ferlito A. Complications of free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection. Oral Oncol. 2004; 40:979–984. PMID: 15509488.
Article
11. Mücke T, Wolff KD, Wagenpfeil S, Mitchell DA, Hölzle F. Immediate microsurgical reconstruction after tumor ablation predicts survival among patients with head and neck carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:287–295. PMID: 19841982.
Article
12. Frederick JW, Sweeny L, Carroll WR, Peters GE, Rosenthal EL. Outcomes in head and neck reconstruction by surgical site and donor site. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123:1612–1617. PMID: 23686870.
Article
13. Fisher J, Wood MB. Late necrosis of a latissimus dorsi free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 74:274–281. PMID: 6463151.
Article
14. Wolff KD, Hölzle F, Wysluch A, Mücke T, Kesting M. Incidence and time of intraoperative vascular complications in head and neck microsurgery. Microsurgery. 2008; 28:143–146. PMID: 18286659.
Article
15. Clinton MS, Sepka RS, Bristol D, Pederson WC, Barwick WJ, Serafin D, et al. Establishment of normal ranges of laser Doppler blood flow in autologous tissue transplants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 87:299–309. PMID: 1824878.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr