J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc.  2018 Nov;57(4):317-322. 10.4306/jknpa.2018.57.4.317.

Sexual Boundary Violation between Psychiatrist and Patient

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. kylim@ajou.ac.kr
  • 2Sunflower Center of Southern Gyeonggi for Women and Children Victims of Violence, Suwon, Korea.

Abstract

Recently, the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association expelled one of its members on grounds of multiple ethical violations, which included a sexual boundary violation between doctor-patient relationships. However, the lack of understanding of why this is an ethical issue was found among the general population as well as psychiatric professionals. In this review article, we introduce the basic concepts of psychotherapy and psychiatrist-patient relationships, including therapeutic structure and transference/countertransference, and elaborate the reasons why boundary violations, and especially sexual boundary violations, are unethical and potentially harmful to the patient and to the psychiatric community.

Keyword

Psychiatric ethics; Boundary violation; Sexual boundary violation

MeSH Terms

Ethics
Humans
Psychiatry*
Psychotherapy

Cited by  1 articles

Understanding of Sexual Violence and the Role of Health Care Provider in Korea
Su-Jin Yang, Yee-Jin Shin
J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2019;58(4):260-269.    doi: 10.4306/jknpa.2019.58.4.260.


Reference

1. Gutheil TH, Gabbard GO. The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry. 1993; 150:188–196.
2. Bloch S, Green SA. Psychiatric ethics. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2006. p. 251–270.
3. Sarkar SP. Boundary violation and sexual exploitation in psychiatry and psychotherapy: a review. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2004; 10:312–320.
Article
4. Garfinkel PE, Dorian B, Sadavoy J, Bagby RM. Boundary violations and department of psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry. 1997; 42:764–770.
5. Gabbard GO. Boundaries and boundary violations in psychoanalysis. 2nd ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association;2016.
6. Kohn NV, Roth JD. The blank screen of cyberspace. Psychoanal Inq. 2012; 32:426–437.
Article
7. Gartrell N, Herman J, Olarte S, Feldstein M, Localio R. Psychiatrist-patient sexual contact: results of a national survey, I: prevalence. Am J Psychiatry. 1986; 143:1126–1131.
Article
8. Gartrell N, Milliken N, Goodson WH 3rd, Thiemann S, Lo B. Physician-patient sexual contact. Prevalence and problems. West J Med. 1992; 157:139–143.
9. Celenza A, Gabbard GO. Analysts who commit sexual boundary violations: a lost cause. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2003; 51:617–636.
Article
10. Gabbard GO. When the patient is a therapist: special challenges in the psychoanalysis of mental health professionals. Psychoanal Rev. 1995; 82:709–725.
11. Gabbard GO. Lessons to be learned from the study of sexual boundary violations. Am J Psychother. 1996; 50:311–322.
Article
12. Simon RI. The natural history of therapist sexual misconduct: identification and prevention. Psychiatr Ann. 1995; 25:90–94.
Article
13. Psychiatry.org [homepage on the Internet]. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association;updated 2013. cited 2018 Aug 29. Available from: https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/Ethics/principles-medical-ethics.pdf.
14. Kcp.or.kr [homepage on the Internet]. Seoul: Korean Clinical Psychology Association;cited 2018 Aug 29. Available from: http://www.kcp.or.kr/sub02_2_3.asp?menuCategory=2.
15. Hall KH. Sexualization of the doctor-patient relationship: is it ever ethically permissible? Fam Pract. 2001; 18:511–515.
Article
16. Garret T. Inappropriate therapist-patient “relationships.”. In : Goodwin R, Cramer D, editors. LEA's series on personal relationships. Inappropriate relationships: The unconventional, the disapproved, and the forbidden. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum;2002. p. 147–170.
17. Gabbard GO, Peltz ML. COPE Study Group on Boundary Violations. Committee on Psychoanalytic Education. Speaking the unspeakable: institutional reactions to boundary violations by training analysts. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2001; 49:659–673.
Article
18. Sandler AM. Institutional responses to boundary violations: the case of Masud Khan. Int J Psychoanal. 2004; 85:27–42.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr