Cancer Res Treat.  2018 Oct;50(4):1074-1083. 10.4143/crt.2017.401.

Supporting Low-income Cancer Patients: Recommendations for the Public Financial Aid Program in the Republic of Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Cancer Policy Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. khparkmd@ncc.re.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
As the recent term of "financial toxicity" implies, cancer causes a treatment-related financial harm. Financial Aid Program for Cancer Patient (FAPCP) is a government's financial support for low-income patients in the Republic of Korea. This study aimed to describe FAPCP applicants' condition and to investigate factors influencing financial burden, which would provide the basis for implementing a strategy for FAPCP administration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The telephone survey results from 2,700 FAPCP participants were analyzed, including demographic, socioeconomic, and disease characteristics and experiences associated with financial burden and the actions or measures to cope with them.
RESULTS
Overall, 87.6% experienced financial burden more than moderate degree, 39.2% got financial help/a loan, 17.8% disposed of their property, and 10.2% changed or stopped treatment owing to medical costs. Monthly household income was connected to financial burden, and the highest income group was associated with the lowest financial burden (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.38) and the lowest rate of changing/stopping care (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.05 to 1.00). Parents of childhood cancer patients got financial help/a loan (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.03 to 4.88) and disposed of their property (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.40 to 7.22) more frequently, and Medical Aids applicants showed the highest rate of changing/stopping care (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.89 to 4.78).
CONCLUSION
FAPCP targets low income groups; however, financial burden and the consequent actions taken still exist disproportionately, depending on the income of the applicants. FAPCP should focus on more vulnerable groups including Medical Aid applicants and parents of childhood cancer patients, by increasing funds and expanding their support coverage.

Keyword

Neoplasms; Patients; Health Care Cost; Financial Support; Public assistance

MeSH Terms

Family Characteristics
Financial Management
Financial Support
Health Care Costs
Humans
Parents
Public Assistance
Republic of Korea*
Telephone

Cited by  2 articles

The Incidences and Characteristics of Various Cancers in Patients on Dialysis: a Korean Nationwide Study
Soon Kil Kwon, Joung-Ho Han, Hye-Young Kim, Gilwon Kang, Minseok Kang, Yeonkook J. Kim, Jinsoo Min
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(25):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e176.

Higher Age Puts Lung Cancer Patients at Risk for Not Receiving Anti-cancer Treatment
Won-Il Choi, Jiah Choi, Mi-Ae Kim, Gyumin Lee, Jihyeon Jeong, Choong Won Lee
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(3):1241-1248.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.513.


Reference

References

1. Kalsekar I, Hsiao CW, Cheng H, Yadalam S, Chen BP, Goldstein L, et al. Economic burden of cancer among patients with surgical resections of the lung, rectum, liver and uterus: results from a US hospital database claims analysis. Health Econ Rev. 2017; 7:22.
Article
2. Glode AE, May MB. Rising cost of cancer pharmaceuticals: cost issues and interventions to control costs. Pharmacotherapy. 2017; 37:85–93.
Article
3. Kim SY, Kim SG, Park JH, Park EC. Costs of initial cancer care and its affecting factors. J Prev Med Public Health. 2009; 42:243–50.
Article
4. Davidoff AJ, Erten M, Shaffer T, Shoemaker JS, Zuckerman IH, Pandya N, et al. Out-of-pocket health care expenditure burden for medicare beneficiaries with cancer. Cancer. 2013; 119:1257–65.
Article
5. Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, et al. The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience. Oncologist. 2013; 18:381–90.
Article
6. Korea Cancer Care Alliance. Recognition and status of cancer patients. In : 2016 KACO Special Symposium; 2016 Nov 4; Seoul, Korea. Seoul: Korean Association for Clinical Oncology. 2016.
7. Korea Cancer Care Alliance. Improving cancer care in Korea. Seoul: Korea Cancer Care Alliance;2016.
8. Kim S, Kwon S. Impact of the policy of expanding benefit coverage for cancer patients on catastrophic health expenditure across different income groups in South Korea. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 138:241–7.
Article
9. Choi JW, Cho KH, Choi Y, Han KT, Kwon JA, Park EC. Changes in economic status of households associated with catastrophic health expenditures for cancer in South Korea. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15:2713–7.
Article
10. OECD Health Statistics 2017 [Internet]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development;2017. [cited 2017 Aug 1]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm.
11. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2017 Financial assistance program for cancer patient guideline. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2017.
12. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Cancer Facts & Figures 2017. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2017.
13. Sim JH, Park JH, Lee JA, Kim SY, Park BR, Park EC. Factors affecting beneficiary satisfaction on financial aid program for cancer patients in Korea. Korean J Health Policy Admin. 2011; 21:61–76.
Article
14. Zafar SY. Financial toxicity of cancer care: it's time to intervene. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016; 108:djv370.
15. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. In-depth analysis report of Korea Health Panel Study 2016. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2016.
16. Meropol NJ, Schulman KA. Cost of cancer care: issues and implications. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:180–6.
Article
17. Kim S, Kwon S. The effect of extension of benefit coverage for cancer patients on health care utilization across different income groups in South Korea. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2014; 14:161–77.
Article
18. Kim Y, Yang B. Relationship between catastrophic health expenditures and household incomes and expenditure patterns in South Korea. Health Policy. 2011; 100:239–46.
Article
19. Woo KS, Shin YJ. The effect of catastrophic health expenditure on household economy: focusing on financial coping and poverty. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2015; 35:166–98.
20. Cho YM. Long-term catastrophic health expenditure: incidence and impacts on household finance. Seoul: Seoul National University;2015.
21. Yun H. Effects of private insurance on medical expenditure. KDI J Econ Policy. 2008; 30:99–128.
22. Lee YC, Im BH, Park YH. The determinants and comparison of health behavior and health service by private medical insurance on National Health-Nutrition Survey. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2010; 10:190–204.
Article
23. Baek IR, Park H, Byun SS. The determinants and medical care utilization behavior of private health insurance. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2012; 12:295–305.
Article
24. Kang SW, Kwon YD, Kim SA. Effect of private health insurance on hospitals in Korea. Korean J Health Econ Policy. 2004; 10:23–36.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr