Diabetes Metab J.  2018 Oct;42(5):380-393. 10.4093/dmj.2017.0102.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Health Behaviors, Metabolic Control, and Chronic Complications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. namms@inha.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
  • 6Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The aim of the study was to assess the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on health behaviors, metabolic control, and chronic complications in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from South Korea, a country with universal health insurance coverage and that has experienced rapid economic and social transition.
METHODS
A total of 3,294 Korean men and women with T2DM aged 30 to 65 years, participating in the Korean National Diabetes Program (KNDP) cohort who reported their SES and had baseline clinical evaluation were included in the current cross-sectional analysis. SES included the level of education and monthly household income.
RESULTS
Lower education level and lower income level were closely related, and both were associated with older age in men and women. Women and men with lower income and education level had higher carbohydrate and lower fat intake. After adjustment for possible confounding factors, higher education in men significantly lowered the odds of having uncontrolled hyperglycemia (glycosylated hemoglobin ≥7.5%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.91 for highest education; P(trend)=0.048), while higher household income in men significantly lowered the odds of having diabetic retinopathy (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.95 for highest income level; P(trend)=0.048). In women, lower income was associated with a higher stress level.
CONCLUSION
Men with lower SES had higher odds of having diabetic retinopathy and uncontrolled hyperglycemia, showing the need to improve care targeted to this population.

Keyword

Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Education; Income; Social class

MeSH Terms

Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2*
Diabetic Retinopathy
Education
Family Characteristics
Female
Health Behavior*
Humans
Hyperglycemia
Insurance, Health
Korea
Male
Social Class*

Cited by  1 articles

Diabetes Fact Sheets in Korea, 2018: An Appraisal of Current Status
Bo-Yeon Kim, Jong Chul Won, Jae Hyuk Lee, Hun-Sung Kim, Jung Hwan Park, Kyoung Hwa Ha, Kyu Chang Won, Dae Jung Kim, Kyong Soo Park
Diabetes Metab J. 2019;43(4):487-494.    doi: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0067.


Reference

1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation;2015.
2. Yoon KH, Lee JH, Kim JW, Cho JH, Choi YH, Ko SH, Zimmet P, Son HY. Epidemic obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asia. Lancet. 2006; 368:1681–1688. PMID: 17098087.
Article
3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998; 352:837–853. PMID: 9742976.
4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2017. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(Suppl 1):S1–S135. PMID: 27979885.
5. Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A. Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011; 40:804–818. PMID: 21335614.
Article
6. Rawshani A, Svensson AM, Zethelius B, Eliasson B, Rosengren A, Gudbjornsdottir S. Association between socioeconomic status and mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176:1146–1154. PMID: 27367969.
Article
7. Wild S, Macleod F, McKnight J, Watt G, Mackenzie C, Ford I, McConnachie A, Lindsay RS. Impact of deprivation on cardiovascular risk factors in people with diabetes: an observational study. Diabet Med. 2008; 25:194–199. PMID: 18290861.
Article
8. Bachmann MO, Eachus J, Hopper CD, Davey Smith G, Propper C, Pearson NJ, Williams S, Tallon D, Frankel S. Socio-economic inequalities in diabetes complications, control, attitudes and health service use: a cross-sectional study. Diabet Med. 2003; 20:921–929. PMID: 14632718.
Article
9. Collier A, Ghosh S, Hair M, Waugh N. Impact of socioeconomic status and gender on glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes complications in type 1 and 2 diabetes: a population based analysis from a Scottish region. Diabetes Metab. 2015; 41:145–151. PMID: 25454092.
Article
10. Larranaga I, Arteagoitia JM, Rodriguez JL, Gonzalez F, Esnaola S, Pinies JA. Sentinel Practice Network of the Basque Country. Socio-economic inequalities in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic diabetic complications in the Basque Country, Spain. Diabet Med. 2005; 22:1047–1053. PMID: 16026371.
Article
11. Wandell PE, Gafvels C. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 35-64 years at four primary health care centres in Stockholm County, Sweden. Prevalence and complications in relation to gender and socio-economic status. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004; 63:195–203. PMID: 14757291.
12. Haffner SM, Hazuda HP, Stern MP, Patterson JK, Van Heuven WA, Fong D. Effects of socioeconomic status on hyperglycemia and retinopathy levels in Mexican Americans with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1989; 12:128–134. PMID: 2702895.
13. Kim SR, Han K, Choi JY, Ersek J, Liu J, Jo SJ, Lee KS, Yim HW, Lee WC, Park YG, Lee SH, Park YM. Age- and sex-specific relationships between household income, education, and diabetes mellitus in Korean adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008-2010. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0117034. PMID: 25622031.
Article
14. Kim SH, Hong SB, Suh YJ, Choi YJ, Nam M, Lee HW, Park IeB, Chon S, Woo JT, Baik SH, Park Y, Kim DJ, Lee KW, Kim YS. KNDP Study Group. Association between nutrient intake and obesity in type 2 diabetic patients from the Korean National Diabetes Program: a cross-sectional study. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27:1188–1195. PMID: 23091316.
Article
15. Rhee SY, Hong SM, Chon S, Ahn KJ, Kim SH, Baik SH, Park YS, Nam MS, Lee KW, Woo JT, Kim YS. Hypoglycemia and medical expenses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis based on the Korea National Diabetes Program Cohort. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0148630. PMID: 26890789.
Article
16. Rhee SY, Chon S, Kwon MK, Park IeB, Ahn KJ, Kim IJ, Kim SH, Lee HW, Koh KS, Kim DM, Baik SH, Lee KW, Nam MS, Park YS, Woo JT, Kim YS. Prevalence of chronic complications in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on the Korean National Diabetes Program. Diabetes Metab J. 2011; 35:504–512. PMID: 22111042.
Article
17. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, Jacobs DR Jr, Montoye HJ, Sallis JF, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993; 25:71–80. PMID: 8292105.
Article
18. Huh BY, Yim JH, Bae JM, Choi SS, Kim SW, Hwang HS. The validity of modified Korean: translated BEPSI (Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument) as instrument of stress measurement in outpatient clinic. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1996; 17:42–53.
19. Frank SH, Zyzanski SJ. Stress in the clinical setting: the brief encounter psychosocial instrument. J Fam Pract. 1988; 26:533–539. PMID: 3367118.
20. World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. Sydney: Health Communications Australia;2000.
21. Chin SO, Rhee SY, Chon S, Baik SH, Park Y, Nam MS, Lee KW, Chun KH, Woo JT, Kim YS. Hypoglycemia is associated with dementia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis based on the Korea National Diabetes Program Cohort. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016; 122:54–61. PMID: 27810686.
Article
22. An SY, Kim HJ, Chun KH, Kim TH, Jeon JY, Kim DJ, Han SJ, Kim YS, Woo JT, Ahn KJ, Park Y, Nam M, Baik SH, Lee KW. Clinical and economic outcomes in medication-adherent and -nonadherent patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Republic of Korea. Clin Ther. 2014; 36:245–254. PMID: 24480636.
Article
23. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:383–393. PMID: 12556541.
Article
24. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998; 352:854–865. PMID: 9742977.
25. Grintsova O, Maier W, Mielck A. Inequalities in health care among patients with type 2 diabetes by individual socio-economic status (SES) and regional deprivation: a systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2014; 13:43. PMID: 24889694.
Article
26. James GD, Baker P, Badrick E, Mathur R, Hull S, Robson J. Ethnic and social disparity in glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: cohort study in general practice 2004-9. J R Soc Med. 2012; 105:300–308. PMID: 22396467.
Article
27. Reisig V, Reitmeir P, Doring A, Rathmann W, Mielck A. KORA Study Group. Social inequalities and outcomes in type 2 diabetes in the German region of Augsburg. A cross-sectional survey. Int J Public Health. 2007; 52:158–165. PMID: 17958282.
Article
28. Connolly VM, Kesson CM. Socioeconomic status and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19:419–422. PMID: 8732702.
Article
29. Unwin N, Binns D, Elliott K, Kelly WF. The relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and socio-economic status in people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 1996; 13:72–79. PMID: 8741816.
Article
30. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60:7–12.
Article
31. Kim J, Sharma SV, Park SK. Association between socioeconomic status and obesity in adults: evidence from the 2001 to 2009 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Prev Med Public Health. 2014; 47:94–103. PMID: 24744826.
Article
32. West SK, Munoz B, Klein R, Broman AT, Sanchez R, Rodriguez J, Snyder R. Risk factors for type II diabetes and diabetic retinopathy in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VER. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 134:390–398. PMID: 12208251.
Article
33. Klein R, Klein BE, Jensen SC, Moss SE. The relation of socioeconomic factors to the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and loss of vision. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:68–76. PMID: 8302566.
Article
34. Lee DS, Kim YJ, Han HR. Sex differences in the association between socio-economic status and type 2 diabetes: data from the 2005 Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES). Public Health. 2013; 127:554–560. PMID: 23706862.
Article
35. Luft HS. Universal health care coverage: a potential hybrid solution. JAMA. 2007; 297:1115–1118. PMID: 17356033.
Article
36. Baz L, Muller N, Beluchin E, Kloos C, Lehmann T, Wolf G, Muller UA. Differences in the quality of diabetes care caused by social inequalities disappear after treatment and education in a tertiary care centre. Diabet Med. 2012; 29:640–645. PMID: 21916976.
Full Text Links
  • DMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr