Yonsei Med J.  2017 Jul;58(4):837-841. 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.837.

Do Cerclage Cables Delay the Time to Bone Union in Patients with an Unstable Humeral Shaft Fracture Treated with Intramedullary Nails?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. doolungee@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the time to bone union after open reduction and internal fixation with cerclage cables followed by intramedullary nailing (IMN) for unstable humeral shaft fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients with a humeral shaft fracture treated by IMN were enrolled. One group of patients was treated via open reduction and internal fixation with cables followed by IMN (cable group; n=32), while the other group was treated with a conventional closed IMN (non-cable group; n=64). The length of time to bone union and functional scores [Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores] were measured for all patients.
RESULTS
No significant differences were found in terms of age, gender, injury type, or smoking history between the two groups, except for the type of fracture. The cable group had significantly more complex types of fracture than the non-cable group (p<0.001). The mean time to bone union was 3.9 months in the cable group, while in the non-cable group, it was 4.4 months (p=0.041). The incidence of postoperative complications, such as non-union, delayed union, and radial nerve palsy, was similar between the two groups (p>0.05). No differences were identified in terms of DASH and UCLA scores (28.8 and 32.1 in the cable group and 26.4 and 32.6 in the non-cable group, respectively; p=0.335 and 0.264).
CONCLUSION
In unstable humeral shaft fractures treated by IMN, open reduction and internal fixation with additional cerclage cables do not delay the length of time to bone union or increase the rate of other complications.

Keyword

Humeral fractures; cerclage; cables; fracture fixation; intramedullary nail

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
*Bone Nails
Female
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects/*methods
Humans
Humeral Fractures/*surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications/etiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A and B) A 29-year-old man with an OTA/AO type-B2 right humeral shaft fracture after a slip down event. Open reduction and internal fixation of the fragments with two cerclage cables followed by intramedullary nailing was performed. (C and D) A radiograph taken 4.5 months after surgery shows bone union. OTA, Orthopaedic Trauma Association.


Reference

1. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures--a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77:279–284. PMID: 16752291.
Article
2. Metsemakers WJ, Wijnen V, Sermon A, Vanderschot P, Nijs S. Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: failure analysis of a single centre series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135:1391–1399. PMID: 26254579.
Article
3. Chen F, Wang Z, Bhattacharyya T. Outcomes of nails versus plates for humeral shaft fractures: a Medicare cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27:68–72. PMID: 23343827.
4. Atalar AC, Kocaoglu M, Demirhan M, Bilsel K, Eralp L. Comparison of three different treatment modalities in the management of humeral shaft nonunions (plates, unilateral, and circular external fixators). J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22:248–257. PMID: 18404034.
Article
5. Whitson RO. Relation of the radial nerve to the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954; 36-A:85–88. PMID: 13130592.
Article
6. Sandhu R, Avramidis K, Johnson-Nurse C. Dall-Miles cable and plate fixation system in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: a review of 20 cases. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005; 13:259–266. PMID: 16365489.
Article
7. Huang MT, Lin CJ. Percutaneous cerclage wiring-assisted interlocking nailing for torsional tibia fractures: a modification with improved safety and simplicity. J Trauma. 2011; 71:1054–1058. PMID: 21986745.
8. Howell JR, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP. Cable plates and onlay allografts in periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip replacement: laboratory and clinical observations. Instr Course Lect. 2004; 53:99–110. PMID: 15116604.
9. Cebesoy O, Subasi M, Isik M. Cerclage cable in fracture: frustration or necessity? Int Orthop. 2011; 35:783–784. PMID: 21384149.
Article
10. Apivatthakakul T, Phaliphot J, Leuvitoonvechkit S. Percutaneous cerclage wiring, does it disrupt femoral blood supply? A cadaveric injection study. Injury. 2013; 44:168–174. PMID: 23164676.
Article
11. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21(10 Suppl):S1–S133. PMID: 18277234.
12. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14:162–166. PMID: 10791665.
Article
13. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001; 14:128–146. PMID: 11382253.
14. Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; (155):7–20.
15. Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Berend ME, Meding JB. A clinical, radiographic, and cost comparison of cerclage techniques: wires vs cables. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:1064–1067. PMID: 17027552.
Article
16. De Smet L, Debeer P, Degreef I. Fixation of a periprosthetic humeral fracture with CCG-cable system. Acta Chir Belg. 2005; 105:543–544. PMID: 16315845.
Article
17. Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T. Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2007; 31:391–395. PMID: 16900354.
Article
18. Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, Mei GH. Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 127:531–535. PMID: 17401571.
Article
19. Kim JW, Oh CW, Byun YS, Kim JJ, Park KC. A prospective randomized study of operative treatment for noncomminuted humeral shaft fractures: conventional open plating versus minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29:189–194. PMID: 25210833.
20. Rhinelander FW, Stewart CL. Experimental fixation of femoral osteotomies by cerclage with nylon straps. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (179):298–307.
Article
21. Ekholm R, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H, Adami J, Tidermark J. Primary radial nerve palsy in patients with acute humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22:408–414. PMID: 18594306.
Article
22. Livani B, Belangero WD, Castro de Medeiros R. Fractures of the distal third of the humerus with palsy of the radial nerve: management using minimally-invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1625–1628. PMID: 17159176.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr