J Adv Prosthodont.  2018 Aug;10(4):315-320. 10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.315.

Polish of interface areas between zirconia, silicate-ceramic, and composite with diamond-containing systems

• Pott PC
• Hoffmann J
• Stiesch M
• Eisenburger M

• KMID: 2418638
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.315

Abstract

PURPOSE
Fractures, occlusal adjustments, or marginal corrections after removing excess composite cements result in rough surfaces of all-ceramic FPDs. These have to be polished to prevent damage of the surrounding tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the roughness of zirconia, silicate-ceramic, and composite after polish with different systems for intraoral use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Each set of 50 plates was made of zirconia, silicate-ceramic, and composite. All plates were ground automatically and were divided into 15 groups according to the treatment. Groups Zgrit, Sgrit, and Cgrit received no further treatment. Groups Zlab and Slab received glaze-baking, and group Clab was polished with a polishing device. In the experimental groups Zv, Sv, Cv, Zk, Sk, Ck, Zb, Sb, and Cb, the specimens were polished with ceramic-polishing systems "v", "k", and "b" for intraoral use. Roughness was measured using profilometry. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and Scheffé-procedure with the level of significance set at P=.05.
RESULTS
All systems reduced the roughness of zirconia, but the differences from the controls Zgrit and Zlab were not statistically significant (P>.907). Roughness of silicate ceramic was reduced only in group Sv, but it did not differ significantly from both controls (P>.580). Groups Cv, Ck, and Cb had a significantly rougher surface than that of group Clab (P < .003).
CONCLUSION
Ceramic materials can be polished with the tested systems. Polishing of interface areas between ceramic and composite material should be performed with polishing systems for zirconia first, followed by systems for veneering materials and for composite materials.

Keyword

Polish; Zirconia; Silicate; Composite; Surface roughness

MeSH Terms

Ceramics
Occlusal Adjustment
Silicates
Silicates

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Boxplot of the surface roughness depending on the materials and on the surface treatment.

• 

  Fig. 2 Possible localizations on partial restorations or crowns for intraoral polish (red lines) with varying number of involved materials. White = enamel, beige = silicate-ceramic, green = zirconia, purple = composite material.

Reference

1. Kassardjian V, Varma S, Andiappan M, Creugers NH, Bartlett D. A systematic review and meta analysis of the longevity of anterior and posterior all-ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2016; 55:1–6. PMID: 27594093.

2. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015; 31:603–623. PMID: 25842099.

3. Bömicke W, Rues S, Hlavacek V, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Fracture Behavior of Minimally Invasive, Posterior, and Fixed Dental Prostheses Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016; 28:367–381. PMID: 27562053.

4. Thoma DS, Sailer I, Ioannidis A, Zwahlen M, Makarov N, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28:1421–1432. PMID: 28191679.

5. Lee SJ, Cheong CW, Wright RF, Chang BM. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2014; 23:112–116. PMID: 23725343.

6. Özcan M. Intraoral repair protocol for chipping or fracture of veneering ceramic in zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17:189–190. PMID: 25969842.

7. Pott PC, Stiesch M, Eisenburger M. Influence of artificial aging on the shear bond strength of zirconia composite interfaces after pretreatment with new 10-MDP adhesive systems. J Dent Mater Tech. 2016; 5:1–9.

8. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96:122–128. PMID: 16911889.

9. Blank JT. Optimize finishing and polishing of posterior composites. Dent Today. 2014; 33:118120–121.

10. Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci. 2013; 5:183–190. PMID: 24136675.

11. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41:314–322. PMID: 24447258.

12. Kou W, Molin M, Sjögren G. Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33:117–124. PMID: 16457671.

13. Subaşı MG, İnan Ö. Evaluation of the topographical surface changes and roughness of zirconia after different surface treatments. Lasers Med Sci. 2012; 27:735–742. PMID: 21786139.

14. Hmaidouch R, Müller WD, Lauer HC, Weigl P. Surface roughness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing. Int J Oral Sci. 2014; 6:241–246. PMID: 25059249.

15. Sun S, Liang R, Ren J, Xu Y, Zhao Y, Meng H. Influence of polishing and glazing on the wear of zirconia and enamel. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016; 51:300–304. PMID: 27220391.

16. Aghan RL, Samuels LE. Mechanism of abrasive polishing. Wear. 1970; 16:293–301.

17. Park C, Vang MS, Park SW, Lim HP. Effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of zirconia and the durability of the polishing systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117:430–437. PMID: 28088308.

18. Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, Schneider-Feyrer S, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012; 10:13–22. PMID: 22520415.

19. Aravind P, Razak PA, Francis PG, Issac JK, Shanoj RP, Sasikumar TP. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of four ceramic finishing systems. J Int Oral Health. 2013; 5:59–64.

20. Amer R, Kürklü D, Kateeb E, Seghi RR. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:1151–1155. PMID: 24836531.

21. Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent. 2015; 43:133–139. PMID: 25174949.

22. Rai R, Gupta R. In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16:564–567. PMID: 24347895.

23. Kamonkhantikul K, Arksornnukit M, Takahashi H, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. Polishing and toothbrushing alters the surface roughness and gloss of composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33:599–606. PMID: 25273038.

24. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997; 13:258–269. PMID: 11696906.