Korean J Ophthalmol.  2018 Aug;32(4):319-327. 10.3341/kjo.2017.0086.

Characteristics of Patients Who Are Not Responsive to Alternate Patching for Overcorrected Intermittent Exotropia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. kris9352@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the characteristics of patients with surgically overcorrected intermittent exotropia treated with alternate patching.
METHODS
The medical records of 51 patients who underwent bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession for intermittent exotropia and required alternate patching to correct postoperative overcorrection were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with postoperative esodeviation ≥18 prism diopters (PD) were started on alternate patching on postoperative day 1, whereas those with postoperative esodeviation of 10 to 17 PD were started after 2 weeks. Postoperative esodeviation <10 PD was considered as slight intentional overcorrection after exotropia surgery. Patients not responsive to alternate patching treatment were defined as those with postoperative esodeviation ≥10 PD after 3 months of treatment. Sex, family history, age, refractive error, amblyopia, stereopsis, suppression, type of exotropia, surgical method, preoperative and postoperative angle of deviation, and start time of alternate patching were compared.
RESULTS
Among 51 patients, 29 patients responded to alternate patching and 22 patients did not respond. Female sex (p = 0.04), larger preoperative exodeviation at distance (p = 0.04), late onset of postoperative maximal esodeviation (p < 0.01), larger postoperative maximal esodeviation at near (p = 0.02), and late initiation of alternate patching (p = 0.01) were associated with patients in the non-responsive group. Although postoperative angle of deviation was similar for 2 weeks, the angle of postoperative esodeviation was significantly larger in the non-responsive group than in the responsive group, beginning at 1 month postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
Female sex, large preoperative exodeviation, late initiation of alternate patching, and large esodeviation 1-month postoperative predisposed patients to be resistant to alternate patching for postoperative overcorrection.

Keyword

Alternate patching treatment; Esotropia; Exotropia; Overcorrection

MeSH Terms

Amblyopia
Depth Perception
Esotropia
Exotropia*
Female
Humans
Medical Records
Methods
Refractive Errors
Retrospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Postoperative changes in the mean angle of deviation at distance in patients responsive and nonresponsive to alternate patching treatment. There were significant differences between the two groups, with esodeviation nearly recovering in the responsive group after 1 month. (−) means esodeviation and (+) means exodeviation. POD = postoperative day.

  • Fig. 2 Postoperative changes in the mean angle of deviation at near in patients responsive and nonresponsive to alternate patching treatment. There were significant differences between the two groups after 1 month. (−) means esodeviation and (+) means exodeviation. POD = postoperative day.


Reference

1. Park H, Kim WJ, Kim MM. The stabilization of postoperative exo-drift in intermittent exotropia after surgical treatment. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016; 30:60–65.
Article
2. Yang M, Chen J, Shen T, et al. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in patients with intermittent exotropia: a large sample study in south China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95:e2590.
3. Campos E. Surgical correction and outcome of exotropia. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2015; 4:185–186.
Article
4. Chang YH, Melvin P, Dagi LR. Goal-determined metrics to assess outcomes of exotropia surgery. J AAPOS. 2015; 19:304–310.
5. Clarke WN, Noel LP. Surgical results in intermittent exotropia. Can J Ophthalmol. 1981; 16:66–69.
6. Hardesty HH. Prisms in the management of intermittent exotropia. Am Orthopt J. 1972; 22:22–30.
Article
7. Kim HJ, Choi DG. Consecutive esotropia after surgery for intermittent exotropia: the clinical course and factors associated with the onset. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:871–875.
Article
8. Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti: early and late postoperative alignments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 82:203–208.
9. Choi YM, Lee JY, Jung JH, et al. Risk factors predicting the need for additional surgery in consecutive esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013; 50:335–339.
Article
10. von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility. St. Louis: CV Mosby;1994. p. 438–442.
11. Hardesty HH. Treatment of overcorrected intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 66:80–86.
Article
12. Park KH, Kim SY. Clinical characteristics of patients that experience different rates of exodrift after strabismus surgery for intermittent exotropia and the effect of the rate of exodrift on final ocular alignment. J AAPOS. 2013; 17:54–58.
13. Wagner RS. Consecutive esotropia following surgery for intermittent exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013; 50:334.
Article
14. Souza-Dias C. Postoperative evolution of the planned initial overcorrection in intermittent exotropia: 61 cases. Binocul Vis Eye Muscle Surg Q. 1993; 8:141–148.
15. Kim DW, Han S, Kim US, Baek SH. Results of conservative management for consecutive esotropia after intermittent exotropia surgery. Eye (Lond). 2015; 29:776–782.
Article
16. Pineles SL, Ela-Dalman N, Zvansky AG, et al. Long-term results of the surgical management of intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2010; 14:298–304.
Article
17. Kim YH, Choi MY. The effect of fresnel prism treatment in consecutive esotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1623–1629.
18. Lee EK, Hwang JM. Prismatic correction of consecutive esotropia in children after a unilateral recession and resection procedure. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:504–511.
Article
19. Lee EK, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Long-term outcome of prismatic correction in children with consecutive esotropia after bilateral lateral rectus recession. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99:342–345.
Article
20. Dawson EL, Marshman WE, Lee JP. Role of botulinum toxin A in surgically overcorrected exotropia. J AAPOS. 1999; 3:269–271.
Article
21. von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Principles of nonsurgical treatment. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book;1996. p. 503.
22. Na KI, Lee JY. Consecutive esotropia after lateral rectus muscle recession for intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1318–1323.
Article
23. Jang JH, Park JM, Lee SJ. Factors predisposing to consecutive esotropia after surgery to correct intermittent exotropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 250:1485–1490.
Article
24. Buck D, Powell CJ, Sloper JJ, et al. Surgical intervention in childhood intermittent exotropia: current practice and clinical outcomes from an observational cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96:1291–1295.
Article
25. Buck D, Powell C, Sloper J, et al. Authors' response: after intermittent exotropia surgery, consecutive esotropia: good or bad? by K K Shoaib. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; 97:797–798.
Article
26. Choi J, Kim SJ, Yu YS. Initial postoperative deviation as a predictor of long-term outcome after surgery for intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2011; 15:224–229.
Article
27. Woo KJ, Choi MY. Clinical course of patients with delayed consecutive esotropia after exotropia surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1812–1818.
Article
28. Han DH, Paik HJ. The minimal postoperative follow-up period to determine secondary surgery in patients with intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014; 55:711–718.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr