J Cardiovasc Imaging.  2018 Jun;26(2):93-102. 10.4250/jcvi.2018.26.e10.

Cardiac and Pericardial 18F-FDG Uptake on Oncologic PET/CT: Comparison with Echocardiographic Findings

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul, St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. younhj@catholic.ac.kr
  • 3Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Interpretation of cardiac uptake on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is often confounded by intense physiological FDG uptake and numerous benign conditions. The aim of the study was to describe the echocardiographic features in concordance with cardiac and pericardial 18F-FDG uptake on whole-body oncology PET/CT.
METHODS
We enrolled 43 consecutive patients (34 solid tumors, 8 lymphomas and 1 leukemia) who were newly diagnosed with non-cardiac malignancy showing incidental cardiac or pericardial 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and underwent transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) within 1 month of PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) of all lesions was measured.
RESULTS
Fifty-six 18F-FDG uptake lesions (32 pericardium, 7 myocardium, 9 cardiac chambers and 8 great vessels) were found, and pericardial effusion was the most common echocardiographic finding (22/43, 51.2%) among study population. Pericardial FDG uptake was shown as pericardial effusion (68.8%), intrapericardial echogenic materials (31.3%), pericardial thickening (28.1%), hyperechogenicity of myopericardium (18.8%), and restricted sliding movement or constrictive pericarditis (15.6%) on TTE. Lesions with regional wall motion abnormality (p = 0.004) or constrictive pericarditis (p = 0.021) had significantly higher mean SUVmax than those without. Myocardial FDG uptake demonstrated pericardial effusion (57.1%), regional wall motion abnormality (57.1%), and increased myocardial wall thickness (42.9%). All cardiac chamber FDG uptakes showed intracardiac mass on TTE.
CONCLUSIONS
Cardiac or pericardial 18F-FDG uptake on oncology PET/CT shows characteristic echocardiographic features according to which heart sites are involved.

Keyword

Cardiac metastases; ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT; Echocardiography

MeSH Terms

Echocardiography*
Echocardiography, Doppler
Electrons
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18*
Heart
Humans
Lymphoma
Myocardium
Pericardial Effusion
Pericarditis, Constrictive
Pericardium
Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography*
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

Figure

  • Figure 1 Comparison of mean SUVmax between primary tumor and metastatic cardiac FDG uptake. FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose, HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma, SUVmax: maximum standardized uptake value.

  • Figure 2 Cardiac and pericardial FDG uptake on whole body oncologic PET/CT and their echocardiographic features. (A) A 69-year-old man with multifocal pericardial FDG uptakes on PET/CT (left). TTE showed RV pericardial echogenic mass protruding into the RV and RA (right, arrow) with RV free wall hypokinesia and compressed RA by the pericardial mass (right, arrow head). (B) A 52-year-old man with focal FDG uptake and central photon defect in IVS on PET/CT (left). TTE revealed a round, homogeneous and hyperechogenic protruding mass on IVS with hypokinetic wall motion (right, arrow). (C) A 69-year-old man with intense FDG uptakes involving RA and IVC on PET/CT (left). TTE demonstrated a round, echogenic mass with irregular margin attached to the septum of the RA side (right upper) that is linked to an irregular heterogeneous echogenic mass from the IVC, showing flow acceleration at IVC entrance (Vmax = 1.8 m/s) (right lower). FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose, IVC: inferior vena cava, IVS: interventricular septum, PET/CT: positron emission tomography/computed tomography, RA: right atrial, RV: right ventricular, TTE: transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.

  • Figure 3 Comparison of mean SUVmax at isolated pericardial FDG uptake lesions with and without echocardiographic abnormal features (n = 29). *p = 0.004, †p = 0.021. FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose, RWMA: regional wall motion abnormality, SUVmax: maximum standardized uptake value.


Reference

1. Bussani R, De-Giorgio F, Abbate A, Silvestri F. Cardiac metastases. J Clin Pathol. 2007; 60:27–34.
Article
2. Bisel HF, Wroblewski F, Ladue JS. Incidence and clinical manifestations of cardiac metastases. J Am Med Assoc. 1953; 153:712–715.
Article
3. Lam KY, Dickens P, Chan AC. Tumors of the heart. A 20-year experience with a review of 12,485 consecutive autopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993; 117:1027–1031.
4. Butany J, Leong SW, Carmichael K, Komeda M. A 30-year analysis of cardiac neoplasms at autopsy. Can J Cardiol. 2005; 21:675–680.
5. McDonnell PJ, Mann RB, Bulkley BH. Involvement of the heart by malignant lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study. Cancer. 1982; 49:944–951.
Article
6. Weber WA. Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:3282–3292.
Article
7. Fischman AJ. Positron emission tomography in the clinical evaluation of metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14:691–696.
Article
8. Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49:480–508.
Article
9. Ding HJ, Shiau YC, Wang JJ, Ho ST, Kao A. The influences of blood glucose and duration of fasting on myocardial glucose uptake of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Nucl Med Commun. 2002; 23:961–965.
Article
10. Kaneta T, Hakamatsuka T, Takanami K, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between physiological FDG uptake in the heart and age, blood glucose level, fasting period, and hospitalization. Ann Nucl Med. 2006; 20:203–208.
Article
11. Fukuchi K, Ohta H, Matsumura K, Ishida Y. Benign variations and incidental abnormalities of myocardial FDG uptake in the fasting state as encountered during routine oncology positron emission tomography studies. Br J Radiol. 2007; 80:3–11.
Article
12. Maurer AH, Burshteyn M, Adler LP, Steiner RM. How to differentiate benign versus malignant cardiac and paracardiac 18F FDG uptake at oncologic PET/CT. Radiographics. 2011; 31:1287–1305.
13. Johnson MH, Soulen RL. Echocardiography of cardiac metastases. AJR. 1983; 141:677–681.
Article
14. Kutalek SP, Panidis IP, Kotler MN, Mintz GS, Carver J, Ross JJ. Metastatic tumors of the heart detected by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J. 1985; 109:343–349.
Article
15. Tominaga K, Shinkai T, Eguchi K, et al. The value of two-dimensional echocardiography in detecting malignant tumors in the heart. Cancer. 1986; 58:1641–1647.
Article
16. Auger D, Pressacco J, Marcotte F, Tremblay A, Dore A, Ducharme A. Cardiac masses: an integrative approach using echocardiography and other imaging modalities. Heart. 2011; 97:1101–1109.
Article
17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16:233–270.
Article
18. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 17:1321–1360.
Article
19. Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26:965–1012.e15.
20. Lobert P, Brown RK, Dvorak RA, Corbett JR, Kazerooni EA, Wong KK. Spectrum of physiological and pathological cardiac and pericardial uptake of FDG in oncology PET-CT. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68:e59–e71.
21. Sheikine Y, Di Carli MF. Integrated PET/CT in the assessment of etiology and viability in ischemic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2008; 5:136–142.
Article
22. Kobylecka M, Maczewska J, Fronczewska-Wieniawska K, Mazurek T, Plazińska MT, Królicki L. Myocardial viability assessment in 18FDG PET/CT study (18FDG PET myocardial viability assessment). Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2012; 15:52–60.
Article
23. Reynen K, Köckeritz U, Strasser RH. Metastases to the heart. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15:375–381.
Article
24. MacGee W. Metastatic and invasive tumours involving the heart in a geriatric population: a necropsy study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1991; 419:183–189.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCVI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr