J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2016;13:39. 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.39.

Impact of individualized learning plans on United States senior medical students advanced clinical rotations

• Guardiola
• Barratt MS
• Omoruyi EA

• KMID: 2413788
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.39

Abstract

The individualized learning plan (ILP) is a tool that promotes self-directed learning. The aim of this pilot study was to look at the perception of the ILPs in United States senior medical school students as a way to improve their learning experience during their advanced practice clerkship. We conducted a survey of graduating medical students that contained both quantitative and open-ended questions regarding the students' experiences with the ILP during their advanced practice clerkship from July 2014 to March 2016. We systematically identified and compiled themes among the qualitative responses. Responses from 294 out of 460 subjects were included for analysis (63.9%). Ninety students (30.6%) reported that the ILP was definitely reviewed at the midpoint and 88 (29.9%) at the final evaluation. One hundred sixty one students (54.8%) felt the ILP provided a framework for learning. One hundred sixty one students (61.6%) felt it was a useful tool in helping open a discussion between the student and faculty. The qualitative data was grouped by areas most mentioned and these areas of concern centered on lack of faculty knowledge about ILP, time to complete ILP, and uncertainty of appropriate goal setting. The majority of students perceive the ILP to be helpful. Our results suggest that active intervention is needed by dedicated and trained faculty to improve ILP utilization. It is recommended that faculty gives students examples of learning goals to create their own learning framework and encourages them to discuss and review the ILP.

Keyword

Clinical clerkship; Goals; Learning; Rotations; United States

MeSH Terms

Clinical Clerkship
Humans
Learning*
Pilot Projects
Schools, Medical
Students, Medical*
Uncertainty
United States*

Reference

References

1. Reed S, Lockspeiser TM, Burke A, Gifford KA, Hanson JL, Mahan JD, McKenna M, Rosenberg A, Li ST. Practical suggestions for the creation and use of meaningful learning goals in graduate medical education. Acad Pediatr. 2016; 16:20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.10.005.

2. Shepard ME, Sastre EA, Davidson MA, Fleming AE. Use of individualized learning plans among fourth-year sub-interns in pediatrics and internal medicine. Med Teach. 2012; 34:e46–e51. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.638013.

3. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program, requirements for graduate medical education in pediatrics, effective July 1, 2015 [Internet]. Chicago (IL): Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education;2015. [cited 2016 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/320_pediatrics_07012015.pdf.

4. Li ST, Burke AE. Individualized learning plans: basics and beyond. Acad Pediatr. 2010; 10:289–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2010.08.002.

5. Burke A. Individualized learning plans: faculty as facilitators. MedEdPORTAL Publ. 2009; 5:1684. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.1684.

6. Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2004; 24:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992.

7. Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In : Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: SAGE Publications;2011. p. 218–262.

8. Li ST, Tancredi DJ, Co JP, West DC. Factors associated with successful self-directed learning using individualized learning plans during pediatric residency. Acad Pediatr. 2010; 10:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.007.