2. Mathysen DG, Aclimandos W, Roelant E, Wouters K, Creuzot-Garcher C, Ringens PJ, Hawlina M, Tassignon MJ. Evaluation of adding item-response theory analysis for evaluation of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013; 91:e573–e577.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.12135.
Article
3. Mathysen DG. Statistical evaluation of multiple-choice assessments: development and validation of a statistical analysis method to monitor the European ophthalmology exit examination, and evaluation of examination questions and methods. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen;2013. p. 200.
4. Mathysen DG, Grupcheva C. Do gender and instructions impact the observed level of self-confidence among candidates sitting a postgraduate medical multiple-choice assessment? Acad J Educ Res. 2014; 2:129–136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15413/ajer.2014.0143.
5. Mathysen DG, Ringens PJ, Midena E, Klett A, Sunaric-M Gevand G, Martinez-Costa R, Curtin D, Grupcheva C. Procedural aspects of the organization of the comprehensive European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016; Jul. 27. [Epub].
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.27.
Article
6. Boorman J, Mathysen DG, Noel JL, Bloch K, Rouffet JB, Tenore A, Papalois V, Sparrow O, Goldik Z. Survey on European postgraduate medical assessments by the Council for European Medical Specialty Assessments (UEMS-CESMA). MedEdPublish. 2014; 3:1–4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15694/mep.2014.003.0042.
Article
8. Aclimandos W, Mathysen DG, Creuzot-Garcher C, Sunaric-Megevand G. Introduction of subspecialty examinations by the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) in close collaboration with European Subspecialty Ophthalmological Societies: FEBO-SA. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93:778–781.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.12738.