Clin Orthop Surg.  2016 Jun;8(2):181-186. 10.4055/cios.2016.8.2.181.

The Effect of Distal Location of the Volar Short Arm Splint on the Metacarpophalangeal Joint Motion

• Kim JY
• Sohn DW
• Park HY
• Yoo JH
• Kim JH
• Jung MG
• Cho JH

• KMID: 2412344
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.2.181

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The goals of this study were to compare maximal metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) flexion angles after application of a volar short arm splint at 3 different locations and verify the relations between the three different physical and radiological locations.
METHODS
Forty dominant hands of healthy subjects were analyzed in the study. We defined a transverse skin folding line as a line drawn from the radial aspect of the thenar crease to the ulnar aspect of the distal transverse palmar crease. The distal end of the volar short arm splint was applied on 3 parallel locations to this line. Location A was on this transverse skin folding line; location B was 1 cm proximal to location A; and location C was 1 cm distal to location A. Two orthopedic surgeons measured the maximal MCPJ flexion angles of each finger except the thumb with the application of a volar short arm splint at 3 different locations as well as without a splint as a control. Radiological locations of the 3 different distal ends of the volar short arm splint were also assessed by anteroposterior radiographs of the wrist.
RESULTS
When the splint was applied at location A and C, the maximal MCPJ flexion angle decreased to a mean of 83° (91% of control value) and 56° (62% of control value), respectively (compared to the control, p < 0.001). At location B, the maximal MCPJ flexion angle was a mean of 90° (99% of control value); no significant difference was observed compared to the control or without the splint (p = 0.103). On radiography, the average length from the metacarpal head to the distal end of the splint at all fingers decreased in the order of location B, A, and C (29 mm, 19 mm, and 10 mm, respectively; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
We recommend applying the distal end of a volar short arm splint at proximal 1 cm to the transverse skin folding line to preserve MCPJ motion perfectly, which is located at distal 44% of the whole metacarpal bone length radiologically.

Keyword

Metacarpophalangeal joint; Joint range of motion; Splint

MeSH Terms

Adult
Cohort Studies
Female
Hand/physiology
Humans
Male
Metacarpophalangeal Joint/*physiology
Middle Aged
Range of Motion, Articular/*physiology
*Splints
Young Adult

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 The crease of midpalmar region is variable and there are diverse individual palmar crease patterns. The transverse palmar creases are of varying patterns depending on the individual as some people do not have separated proximal and distal transverse palmar creases (A) and instead have one transverse palmar crease that is called a simian crease (B).

• 

  Fig. 2 Three different locations for distal end of the volar short arm splint were tested. A transverse skin folding line was marked with dashed line between the radial border of the thenar crease and the ulnar border of the distal palmar transverse crease. Location A was marked on the transverse skin folding line, location B was defined as 1 cm vertically proximal to location A, and location C was defined as 1 cm vertically distal to location A.

• 

  Fig. 3 (A) Location A. (B) Location B. (C) Location C. The distance from the metacarpal head to the distal end of the splint (a) and the whole length of the metacarpal bone (b) were measured for every metacarpal bone except for the thumb on the wrist anteroposterior X-ray according to location A, B, and C.

Reference

1. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J. Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(2):243–248. PMID: 9546453.

2. Warwick D, Field J, Prothero D, Gibson A, Bannister GC. Function ten years after Colles' fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (295):270–274. PMID: 8403660.

3. Gutow AP. Avoidance and treatment of complications of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2005; 21(3):295–305. PMID: 16039441.

4. Dekkers M, Soballe K. Activities and impairments in the early stage of rehabilitation after Colles' fracture. Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26(11):662–668. PMID: 15204505.

5. Belloti JC, Santos JB, Atallah AN, Albertoni WM, Faloppa F. Fractures of the distal radius (Colles' fracture). Sao Paulo Med J. 2007; 125(3):132–138. PMID: 17923936.

6. Teunis T, Bot AG, Thornton ER, Ring D. Catastrophic thinking is associated with finger stiffness after distal radius fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(10):e414–e420. PMID: 25866942.

7. Broos PL, Fourneau IA, Stoffelen DV. Fractures of the distal radius: current concepts for treatment. Acta Orthop Belg. 2001; 67(3):211–218. PMID: 11486681.

8. Levy J, Ernat J, Song D, Cook JB, Judd D, Shaha S. Outcomes of long-arm casting versus double-sugar-tong splinting of acute pediatric distal forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015; 35(1):11–17. PMID: 24787302.

9. Bong MR, Egol KA, Leibman M, Koval KJ. A comparison of immediate postreduction splinting constructs for controlling initial displacement of fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized study of long-arm versus short-arm splinting. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31(5):766–770. PMID: 16713840.

10. Kim JK, Kook SH, Kim YK. Comparison of forearm rotation allowed by different types of upper extremity immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(5):455–460. PMID: 22398740.

11. Bugbee WD, Botte MJ. Surface anatomy of the hand: the relationships between palmar skin creases and osseous anatomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (296):122–126. PMID: 8222413.