Clin Orthop Surg.  2018 Jun;10(2):265-268. 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.265.

Traumatic Absence of the Shaft of the Radius in a Child: A 15-Year Follow-up after Reconstruction by a Modified Define's One Bone Forearm Procedure

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju, Korea. msmoonos@hotmail.com
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3CurenCare Research, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Traumatic absence of the entire radial shaft in children has not been reported though there are a few reports of adult cases. We report a 5-year-old boy with traumatic absence of the entire right radial shaft. The Define's reconstruction procedure was chosen to localize the surgery only to the distal forearm and avoid further additional damage to the forearm muscles. The child's forearm was successfully reconstructed by the authors' modified Define's procedure, which was followed until his maturity. Hand function was well maintained.

Keyword

Absence; Radial shaft; Traumatic; Reconstruction; Child

MeSH Terms

Adult
Child*
Child, Preschool
Follow-Up Studies*
Forearm*
Hand
Humans
Male
Muscles
Radius*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Diagram illustrating the method of transposition of the osteotomized ulna to the radius.

  • Fig. 2 Radiographs taken at initial visit on March 18, 1977 showing the loss of right radial shaft and elbow dislocation.

  • Fig. 3 (A) Radiographs showing the transplanted osteotomized distal ulna to the remaining distal radial metaphysis after the modified Define's procedure. (B) Nonunion of the ulna transposed to the radial metaphysis is shown.

  • Fig. 4 Radiographs taken on January 10, 1979 showing the periosteocorticocancellous bone graft to the nonunion site which was fixated with two Kirschner wires.

  • Fig. 5 Final follow-up radiographs taken on June 22, 1992 at the age of 20 years. The reconstructed right forearm showed the bifurcated distal ulna without wrist deformity despite some shortening of the forearm (17.5 cm, A) compared to the normal left forearm (27.5 cm, B).


Reference

1. Kato K. Congenital absence of the radius: with review of literature and report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1924; 6(3):589–626.
2. Starr DE. Congenital absence of the radius: a method of surgical correction. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945; 27(4):572–577.
3. Lamb DW. The treatment of radial club hand: absent radius, aplasia of the radius, hypoplasia of the radius, radial paraxial hemimelia. Hand. 1972; 4(1):22–30.
4. Pulvertaft RG. Twenty-five years of hand surgery: personal reflections. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973; 55(1):32–55.
5. Lamb DW. Radial club hand: a continuing study of sixty-eight patients with one hundred and seventeen club hands. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59(1):1–13.
Article
6. Dreyfuss U. Acquired club hand: a case report. Hand. 1977; 9(3):268–271.
7. Bosworth DM, Liebler WA, Nastasi AA, Hamada K. Resection of the tibial shaft for osteomyelitis in children: a thirty-two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966; 48(7):1328–1339.
8. Moon MS, Kim CH. Healing of the bony gap with periosteal osteogenesis after tibial diaphysectomy in adult. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1971; 6(1):75–78.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr