1. Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. A critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am. 1994; 21:517–529. PMID:
8059505.
2. Enatsu N, Yamaguchi K, Chiba K, Miyake H, Fujisawa M. Clinical outcome of microsurgical varicocelectomy in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia. Urology. 2014; 83:1071–1074. PMID:
24674115.
Article
3. Richardson I, Grotas AB, Nagler HM. Outcomes of varicocelectomy treatment: an updated critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am. 2008; 35:191–209. viiiPMID:
18423240.
Article
4. Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009; 30:33–40. PMID:
18772487.
Article
5. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;1999. p. 128.
6. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009; 55:1037–1063. PMID:
19185977.
Article
7. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Agarwal R, Short RA, Sabanegh E, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007; 70:532–538. PMID:
17905111.
Article
8. Kim KH, Lee JY, Kang DH, Lee H, Seo JT, Cho KS. Impact of surgical varicocele repair on pregnancy rate in subfertile men with clinical varicocele and impaired semen quality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Korean J Urol. 2013; 54:703–709. PMID:
24175046.
Article
9. Ishikawa T, Kondo Y, Yamaguchi K, Sakamoto Y, Fujisawa M. Effect of varicocelectomy on patients with unobstructive azoospermia and severe oligospermia. BJU Int. 2008; 101:216–218. PMID:
17941933.
Article
10. Tournaye H, Merdad T, Silber S, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, et al. No difference in outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14:90–95.
11. Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Hariprashad JJ, Ergün B, Mielnik A, Zaninovic N, et al. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14:741–748. PMID:
10221707.
Article
12. Kupker W, Schlegel PN, Al-Hasani S, Fornara P, Johannisson R, Sandmann J, et al. Use of frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73:453–458. PMID:
10688995.
13. Habermann H, Seo R, Cieslak J, Niederberger C, Prins GS, Ross L. In vitro fertilization outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73:955–960. PMID:
10785220.
Article
14. Mercan R, Urman B, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Nuhoglu A, Isiklar A, et al. Outcome of testicular sperm retrieval procedures in non-obstructive azoospermia: percutaneous aspiration versus open biopsy. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15:1548–1551. PMID:
10875864.
Article
15. Nagy Z, Liu J, Cecile J, Silber S, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Using ejaculated, fresh, and frozen-thawed epididymal and testicular spermatozoa gives rise to comparable results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63:808–815. PMID:
7890067.
16. Gil-Salom M, Mínguez Y, Rubio C, De los Santos MJ, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10:3166–3170. PMID:
8822436.
17. Hussein AF. The role of color Doppler ultrasound in prediction of the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2006; 176:2141–2145. PMID:
17070279.
Article
18. Orhan I, Onur R, Semerciöz A, Firdolas F, Ardicoglu A, Köksal IT. Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele. Arch Androl. 2005; 51:213–220. PMID:
16025860.
Article